Robert L. Cochran wrote:
I'm new to the CPU-level stuff and don't have much background in them.
So some of the terms are new for me. Let me get really basic: why
would you want multiple processors on a motherboard as opposed to a
single fast processor?
Well I personally can think of 3 insta
- Original Message -
From: "Robert L. Cochran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: Hyper Threaded Pentium 4
> I'm new to the CPU-level stuff and don't have much background in them.
> So so
this shouldn't have to be the case, when the P-pro came out it was like
that because of it's new features and intel just wanted to get it out the
door, but when the P-II came out it had optimization for 16 bit code + a
lot of other bug fixes. If it is slower, that's likely to change
eventually
On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 20:35, Robert L. Cochran wrote:
> I'm new to the CPU-level stuff and don't have much background in them.
> So some of the terms are new for me. Let me get really basic: why would
> you want multiple processors on a motherboard as opposed to a single
> fast processor? I take
Pete, thanks a lot! I'm learning.
Bob
Pete Huckelba wrote:
At 07:35 PM 10/14/2002, you wrote:
I'm new to the CPU-level stuff and don't have much background in
them. So some of the terms are new for me. Let me get really basic:
why would you want multiple processors on a motherboard as oppos
end to agree with 'hack' though I'm not an engineer and I can't really tell
you with any degree of non-troll like intelligence.
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Robert L. Cochran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, Octob
At 07:35 PM 10/14/2002, you wrote:
I'm new to the CPU-level stuff and don't have much background in them. So
some of the terms are new for me. Let me get really basic: why would you
want multiple processors on a motherboard as opposed to a single fast
processor?
More is always better, unless y
x27;t really tell
you with any degree of non-troll like intelligence.
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Robert L. Cochran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 8:35 PM
Subject: Re: Hyper Threaded Pentium 4
> I'm new
- Original Message -
From: "Robert L. Cochran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 8:35 PM
Subject: Re: Hyper Threaded Pentium 4
I take it that the Xeon line is for multiple CPU
> motherboards -- you don't just run one Xeon
I'm new to the CPU-level stuff and don't have much background in them.
So some of the terms are new for me. Let me get really basic: why would
you want multiple processors on a motherboard as opposed to a single
fast processor? I take it that the Xeon line is for multiple CPU
motherboards -- yo
Robert L. Cochran wrote:
I think a 3.0 Ghz Pentium 4 will be coming out later this year which
will feature Hyper Threading. The definition of Hyper Threading that
I've read in Maximum PC, November 2002, p.14 is:
"...The technology helps a compatible OS utilize CPU resources more
effectively b
I think a 3.0 Ghz Pentium 4 will be coming out later this year which
will feature Hyper Threading. The definition of Hyper Threading that
I've read in Maximum PC, November 2002, p.14 is:
"...The technology helps a compatible OS utilize CPU resources more
effectively by splitting the chip into t
12 matches
Mail list logo
