Re: Gnome... ARGH!

2002-10-05 Thread Havoc Pennington
Paul Gear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Its cut & paste seems a clunky, though. It used to be that you could > cut & paste newlines, but that doesn't seem to be the case now (at > least for lines that aren't full - haven't tried with others). Also, > you used to be able to single click anywhe

Re: Gnome... ARGH!

2002-10-05 Thread Paul Gear
Havoc Pennington wrote: Gordon Messmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: So what are the advantages of VTE? The big reason we use it is that it works in character sets other than ASCII. Zvt doesn't even work in Latin-1. VTE also uses the new font system and redraws more correctly (fewer bugs, no

Re: Gnome... ARGH!

2002-10-05 Thread Havoc Pennington
Gordon Messmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So what are the advantages of VTE? The big reason we use it is that it works in character sets other than ASCII. Zvt doesn't even work in Latin-1. VTE also uses the new font system and redraws more correctly (fewer bugs, no flicker). Havoc

Re: Gnome... ARGH!

2002-10-05 Thread Gordon Messmer
On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 07:44, Havoc Pennington wrote: > > Not 100% true; the official GNOME release uses Sawfish by default, and Whoohoo! ;) > the Zvt terminal emulator; we use Metacity and VTE. So what are the advantages of VTE? It seems to eat up an *awful* lot of CPU time. I don't even lik