On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 13:54, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> We have a series of machines that share the same nfs mounted user
> directories. This nfs mounted filesystem has quotas enabled on the
> server and one can indeed run quota on the server to find out your
> quota. But on the clients the running is
We have a series of machines that share the same nfs mounted user
directories. This nfs mounted filesystem has quotas enabled on the
server and one can indeed run quota on the server to find out your
quota. But on the clients the running is supposed to work through a
call to rpc.rquotad on the serv
On 17:50 18 Feb 2003, Pavel Rozenboim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| > Does anyone know why different filesystems are available on so many of the
| > other distro's but Red Hat does not support them. Mandrake, Suse, Debian,
|
Probably because it is much harder to support all these filesystems. The
fact that RedHat doesn't just throw in every piece of software it can grab
allows them to create very stable and supportable distro.
Also, their new support policy only limits support lifetime for their
"no
On Tuesday 18 February 2003 07:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
> Does anyone know why different filesystems are available on so many of the
> other distro's but Red Hat does not support them. Mandrake, Suse, Debian,
> Slackware, and others do support xfs. It handles acl's nat
Does anyone know why different filesystems are available on so many of the other distro's but Red Hat does not support them. Mandrake, Suse, Debian, Slackware, and others do support xfs. It handles acl's natively and Red Hat took out acl support in there new kernel yet they won
rror for wireless request "Set Encode" (8B2A) :
ifup: SET failed on device eth0 ; No such device.
ifup: Error for wireless
request "Set ESSID" (8B1A) :
ifup: SET failed on device eth0 ; No such
device.
netfs: Mounting other filesystems: suc
