At 02:05 PM 3/29/2003 -0600, you wrote:
So, let me re-phrase the question. What significant difference is there
(if any) between RH8/9 outfitted compltetly open-source and RH secure
server? Is secure server *NOT* open source. Can RH8/9 serve as a secure
enterprise server system just as well as s
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 01:03:41 -0600, you wrote:
>"Red Hat will provide errata maintenance for AT LEAST 12 months [... and]
>may extend errata maintenance for certain popular releases[.]"
>
>Yes, up2date MAY go away for your RH release 12 months after it came out,
>but there is no certainty that i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 30 March 2003 02:03 am, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> At 07:33 PM 3/29/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> >On Saturday 29 March 2003 06:55 pm, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> > > At 04:05 PM 3/25/2003 -0900, you wrote:
> > > >After 12 months, up2date goes away if
At 07:33 PM 3/29/2003 -0500, you wrote:
On Saturday 29 March 2003 06:55 pm, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> At 04:05 PM 3/25/2003 -0900, you wrote:
> >After 12 months, up2date goes away if you don't use enterprise.
>
> Please provide evidence that this is true, as it does not match my
> reading of the ava
On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 13:00, Charles wrote:
> I realize I am coming in a bit late, but would someone please expain
> *exactly why* RH should not be run on the enterprise?
The point is that it can.
> There are folk in the local linux user group that assert that RH
> simply cannot be ma
At 12:00 PM 3/29/2003 -0600, you wrote:
There are folk in the local linux user group that assert that RH simply
cannot be made secure.
I would really appreciate a little enlightenment on this.
There are folks (still!) who assert the world is flat and simply cannot be
made round.
There are folks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 29 March 2003 06:55 pm, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> At 04:05 PM 3/25/2003 -0900, you wrote:
> >After 12 months, up2date goes away if you don't use enterprise.
>
> Please provide evidence that this is true, as it does not match my
> reading of
At 04:05 PM 3/25/2003 -0900, you wrote:
After 12 months, up2date goes away if you don't use enterprise.
Please provide evidence that this is true, as it does not match my reading
of the available literature. A URL will suffice.
--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[E
Ed Wilts wrote:
On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 12:00:24PM -0600, Charles wrote:
I realize I am coming in a bit late, but would someone please expain
*exactly why* RH should not be run on the enterprise?
No on can because the statement is false.
There are folk in the local linux user group that as
On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 12:00:24PM -0600, Charles wrote:
> I realize I am coming in a bit late, but would someone please expain
> *exactly why* RH should not be run on the enterprise?
No on can because the statement is false.
> There are folk in the local linux user group that assert that RH
Joe Klemmer wrote:
On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 18:27, Guy Fraser wrote:
You must be talking about home users without any important data.
Many servers and workstations run until they can not be feasibly
maintained, or there is a compelling reason to upgrade.
Well, since we are discussing RH's Perso
On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 17:52, Guy Fraser wrote:
> That is why the company I work for has migrated all but two RH servers
> to FreeBSD.
[..]
> Moving to FreeBSD has been an improvement over OSF/1,True64, Solaris,
> SCO, BSDI and all other Linux Platforms.
Free|Net|OpenBSD are all great op
Hiya,
> Most servers do not run on enterprise class machines and standard or
> proffesional Red Hat Linux
> was just fine.
I have to disagree here. For a small company, meaning less than 150
people maybe. Most companies run servers on server class equipment. In
mine for example is all Dell and
Joe Klemmer wrote:
On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 18:27, Guy Fraser wrote:
You must be talking about home users without any important data.
Many servers and workstations run until they can not be feasibly
maintained, or there is a compelling reason to upgrade.
Well, since we are discussing RH's
On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 18:27, Guy Fraser wrote:
> You must be talking about home users without any important data.
>
> Many servers and workstations run until they can not be feasibly
> maintained, or there is a compelling reason to upgrade.
Well, since we are discussing RH's Personal/Pr
You must be talking about home users without any important data.
Many servers and workstations run until they can not be feasibly
maintained, or there is a
compelling reason to upgrade.
Joe Klemmer wrote:
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 19:22, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
Starting with Red Hat 8.0 errata
On Wednesday 26 March 2003 07:38, Mike Vanecek uttered:
> Under this new scheme of things, what is contained in rawhide, RH 9?
rawhide is, and always will be, an alpha/beta package dumping grounds,
continuing the development of OSS. These packages may/may not appear in a
later release or errata
On Wednesday 26 March 2003 07:34, Mike Vanecek uttered:
> My basic subscription for the RH 8 channel does not expire until Feb 2004.
> What will happen to my subscription after 12/31/03?
Entitlements can be passed from one system to another, or from one release to
the next. So if you install R
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 21:25:05 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote
> On Tuesday 25 March 2003 17:05, Michael Smith uttered:
> > After 12 months, up2date goes away if you don't use enterprise.
>
> Again, I point you to the "At least 12 months" No where does it say
> you get 12 months, and 12 months _only_ f
On 25 Mar 2003 16:05:09 -0900, Michael Smith wrote
> After 12 months, up2date goes away if you don't use enterprise.
My basic subscription for the RH 8 channel does not expire until Feb 2004.
What will happen to my subscription after 12/31/03?
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
h
On Tuesday 25 March 2003 17:05, Michael Smith uttered:
> After 12 months, up2date goes away if you don't use enterprise.
Again, I point you to the "At least 12 months" No where does it say you get
12 months, and 12 months _only_ for up2date (RHN) services.
--
Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE
http://g
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 19:22, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> Starting with Red Hat 8.0 errata are only provided for 12 months after
> release. The only products with errata periods longer than 12 months
> are the products in the Enterprise line.
With the average Joe User of Linux being used to
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 08:15:58PM -0500, Justin Zygmont wrote:
> we'll see very soon, at the end of the month 6.2 and 7.0 will expire. I'm
> curious if there will be any package updates, but I somehow doubt there
> will.
6.1 support has been terminated for quite a while. We simply grab the
6.
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 16:33:03 -0800, you wrote:
>On Tuesday 25 March 2003 16:22, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
>> It just won't be provided after 12 months.
>
>Wrong. popular releases will be supported for longer, releases such as 6.2 or
>maybe even 7.3. If you read the fine print, it's "at least 12 m
After 12 months, up2date goes away if you don't use enterprise.
THIS THREAD IS GOING OVERBOARD.
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 15:33, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 March 2003 16:22, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> > It just won't be provided after 12 months.
>
> Wrong. popular releases will be supporte
we'll see very soon, at the end of the month 6.2 and 7.0 will expire. I'm
curious if there will be any package updates, but I somehow doubt there
will.
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 March 2003 16:22, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> > It just won't be provided after 12 mo
On Tuesday 25 March 2003 16:22, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> It just won't be provided after 12 months.
Wrong. popular releases will be supported for longer, releases such as 6.2 or
maybe even 7.3. If you read the fine print, it's "at least 12 months" not
"at the most 12 months". Seems to me tha
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 15:40:11 -0800, you wrote:
>Gerald Henriksen wrote:
>
> > So your average person at home now has a choice of Windows XP at $300
> > or Red Hat Enterprise Workstation at $300 ($60 a year after the first
> > year for access to security fixes). Guess what, XP comes with full
> >
Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> So your average person at home now has a choice of Windows XP at $300
> or Red Hat Enterprise Workstation at $300 ($60 a year after the first
> year for access to security fixes). Guess what, XP comes with full
> multimedia capabilities including MP3 and DVD, as well
29 matches
Mail list logo
