Re: [Fwd: ScanMail Message: To Sender Match eManager setting and take actio n.]

2003-03-12 Thread Andrew Kelly
Tony Nugent wrote: > I would complain. It is one thing to scan for and block/drop > viruses and spam (and "bad" attachments etc), but filtering content > with a "profanity" block in otherwise legitimate emails is > tantamount to unilateral censorship. What right have they to do > that? Profan

Re: [Fwd: ScanMail Message: To Sender Match eManager setting and take actio n.]

2003-03-12 Thread Tony Nugent
On Wed Mar 12 2003 at 00:07, "Rodolfo J. Paiz" wrote: > What the...? Yeah, this is bad. One of your outgoing SMTP relays is using an email content filter that is obviously doing this... > -Forwarded Message- > > > From: System Attendant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' <