Statically linked application with multiple dlopen() crashes

2003-09-11 Thread Muthu_T
All, I have an application which is statically linked. It uses dlopen() and dlclose() calls multiple times. First time the dlopen()/dlclose() pair succeeds. But the second one fails with segfault. This happens only in RH AS2.1, not in RH 8.x/9.x Any bug in glibc? Any ideas? Thanks. --T. M

samba printing

2003-09-11 Thread tsvi
hello all i am trying to set a samba print server for a m$ network (using red-hat 8.0 and samba 2.2.7-5.8.0). everything is working fine when installing drivers manualy on clients but when i try to set drivers for a point n' click installations i get an error message "printer settings could not be

Did terminate it

2003-09-11 Thread support
Hi Randy, I did terminate the backup unit too, terminator light read green for DLT which is what it is. I have it connected to channel A on the adapter, it's a 2 channel card. -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list -- Psyche-list m

RE: Tape Backup device not found error when using mt

2003-09-11 Thread support
Hi thanks Michael, >You need to have the st module loaded. Try an lsmod |grep st >Is this a new scsi card? Have you checked for proper termination of the >scsi bus? When you installed the DLT, did kudzu recognize it and ask you >if you wanted to configure it? I got... st 3

Re: Tape Backup device not found error when using mt

2003-09-11 Thread Randy Kelsoe
Martinez, Michael wrote: Do I need to set up mt to find, recognize or scan the drive first? How would I do that, man mt is pretty cryptic. Thanks. mt -f /dev/st0 rewind dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/st0 bs=1048576 You need to have the st module loaded. Try an lsmod |grep st Is this a new scsi car

RE: Tape Backup device not found error when using mt

2003-09-11 Thread support
Hi Mike, Checked the entire file, did not see anything like st0 or tape. Is there another way? like a device scanner? Regards -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martinez, Michael Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 11:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Tape Backup device not found error when using mt

2003-09-11 Thread Martinez, Michael
Look thru /var/log/dmesg to see the device. It will tell you if its /dev/st0 or what. Mike -- Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thu Sep 11 11:07

Tape Backup device not found error when using mt

2003-09-11 Thread support
Hi, I just installed a new tape backup unit in my RH 8 box and am trying to see if it’s installed OK. Connected to an Adaptec SCSI card, it’s a DLT Tape 4 unit. I ran the below mt commands and got device not found error. Do I need to set up mt to find, recognize or scan the drive first? How wo

Re: Localhost is bad

2003-09-11 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 20:23, Greg Goldstein wrote: [snip] > I have done that (added the one line localhost.localdomain), however the > above messages persist. [snip] Could you post your /etc/hosts file? Also the output from `ls -al /etc/hosts` and `hostname`. This might help in determining the

re: Localhost is bad

2003-09-11 Thread Greg Goldstein
I solved this problem. I noted that the Dim4600 connects to the internet via a shared ADSL modem, and is connected to the modem via a hub. A second PC called "localhost alpha" running RH7.2 that is connected to the hub lists a previous PC (sold some time ago) called "localhost beta" in its et

Re: NEW VIRUS

2003-09-11 Thread Jesse Keating
On Thursday 11 September 2003 09:48, Craig White wrote: > I really hope that nowhere above you are inviting posting of all new > email borne threats for Windows mail clients on this list. Absolutely not, just pointing out that certain windows issues are not all that off-topic for a Red Hat list.

Re: NEW VIRUS

2003-09-11 Thread Suresh Babu A. [IT Engineer]
Dear All, Sorry for posting a windows virus threat here and that too turned as an hoax, my intention was to send an alert. Suresh On 11 Sep 2003, Craig White wrote: > Date: 11 Sep 2003 09:48:16 -0700 > From: Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: NEW VIRUS

2003-09-11 Thread Craig White
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 09:33, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thursday 11 September 2003 09:23, Craig White wrote: > > more importantly, this is a Red Hat Linux discuss list - Windows > > virii are entirely irrelevant > > Unless you're using your RHL system as an email server, providing > Windows Virus

Re: NEW VIRUS

2003-09-11 Thread Jesse Keating
On Thursday 11 September 2003 09:23, Craig White wrote: > more importantly, this is a Red Hat Linux discuss list - Windows > virii are entirely irrelevant Unless you're using your RHL system as an email server, providing Windows Virus scanning services upon every message transferred, but I digre

RE: NEW VIRUS

2003-09-11 Thread Craig White
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 07:04, Suresh Babu A. [IT Engineer] wrote: > Dear All, > > Apology if it is an hoax. > more importantly, this is a Red Hat Linux discuss list - Windows virii are entirely irrelevant Craig -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/l

Re: Enabling Telnet Services

2003-09-11 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 10:53:07AM -0400, Martinez, Michael wrote: > I assume these commands just modify the "disable = yes | no" line in > /etc/xinetd.d/telnet ? No, it does this and more. The man page explains it rather well, including under what conditions services are stopped or started. > >

RE: Enabling Telnet Services

2003-09-11 Thread Martinez, Michael
I assume these commands just modify the "disable = yes | no" line in /etc/xinetd.d/telnet ? Michael Martinez Linux System Administrator ISTM/CSREES United States Department of Agriculture -Original Message- From: William F. Acker WB2FLW +1-303-722-7209 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tu

RE: NEW VIRUS

2003-09-11 Thread Suresh Babu A. [IT Engineer]
Dear All, Apology if it is an hoax. Suresh A. On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Hunt,Russ wrote: > Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 09:51:59 -0400 > From: "Hunt,Russ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: NEW VIRUS > > It's a hoax > > See http

RE: NEW VIRUS

2003-09-11 Thread Hunt,Russ
It's a hoax See http://vil.mcafee.com/dispVirus.asp?virus_k=98893 -Original Message- From: Suresh Babu A. [IT Engineer] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 September 2003 14:37 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NEW VIRUS Dear All, WORST VIRUS EVER--CNN ANNOUNCED PLEASE SEND THIS TO

Re: Format utility

2003-09-11 Thread Tom Diehl
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Suresh Babu A. [IT Engineer] wrote: > Dear All, > > What is the default format utility in red hat [no GUI Tools please]? For ext2/3 partitions use mke2fs with the revelant options. Man mke2fs for more info. HTH, -- ..Tom Registered Linux User #14522

NEW VIRUS

2003-09-11 Thread Suresh Babu A. [IT Engineer]
Dear All, WORST VIRUS EVER--CNN ANNOUNCED PLEASE SEND THIS TO EVERYONE ON YOUR CONTACT LIST !! A new virus has just been discovered that has been classified by Microsoft as the most destructive ever! This virus was discovered yesterday afternoon by McAfee and no vaccine has yet !

Format utility

2003-09-11 Thread Suresh Babu A. [IT Engineer]
Dear All, What is the default format utility in red hat [no GUI Tools please]? Thanks SureshA [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

Localhost is bad

2003-09-11 Thread Greg Goldstein
During the linux startup on my RH 8.0 Dell Dimension 4600, I see this message "Localhost is bad" when lpd starts (however lpd still gets "OK"). When starting Gnome as root there is this message: "Could not look up internet address for localhost.localdomain. This will prevent GNOME from operati