On Fri, 30 May 2003, Charles Curley wrote:
> I tried installing a new kernel on one machine, and got the following
> error message:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# rpm -ivh /var/spool/autoupdate/kernel-2.4.20-13.8.i686.rpm
> Preparing...### [10
I tried installing a new kernel on one machine, and got the following
error message:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# rpm -ivh /var/spool/autoupdate/kernel-2.4.20-13.8.i686.rpm
Preparing...### [100%]
installing package kernel-2.4.20-13.8 need
Friday 30 May 2003 18:52, Stephen Liu:
> KStart -> Extras -> Internet - > KPPP
Check where it points to. By default, it points not directly to
/usr/bin/kppp, but to some RH wrapper. Change it.
Also check your path variable from shell (echo $PATH), since from it
dependes what program is started
Add the user to group uucp.
That should take care of it.
As you can see below only user root and group uucp can access
the serial ports.
crw-rw1 root uucp 4, 64 Aug 30 2002 /dev/ ttyS0
crw-rw1 root uucp 4, 65 Aug 30 2002 /dev/ttyS1
crw-rw1 root
Hi Dusan,
Further to my late posting. I have recovered /dev/modem and made it
symbolic linked to /dev/ttyLT0. Modem is now working.
Get back to your advice. Some thing strange happened. It works but is
not stable.
Konsole window
$ su -
password
# chmod +s /usr/sbin/kppp (return)
# (n
On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 03:27, Stephen Liu wrote:
> Hi Dusan,
>
> Lucent modem (winmodem)
> ==
>
> Thanks for your advice.
>
> Before testing your suggestion, I accidentally delete /dev/modem which
> is symbolic linked to /dev/ttyLT0. Rebooting PC could not recover it.
> mkdi
Hi
I have setup many "headless" servers with a few X-apps, as long as the
application's dependancies
are met they should work. I always put Nedit on my servers, it also
requires "motif" libraries. If you
want to know what a program requires to run do somting like this :
$ rpm -q --requires nedi
On Friday 30 May 2003 03:42, Ross Macintyre wrote:
> Thanks for this information Jesse - exactly what I was looking for. Bad
> coincidence that I decided to take the opportunity of putting on the
> latest redhat kernel at the same time as trying out megamgr!
> You say the performance is bad under 2