Tried to build from pspp-stable-20090311.tar.gz downloaded from
http://pspp.benpfaff.org/~blp/.
I have an intel P4 running openSuSE 10.3, so I've followed instructions from
http://jstover.motd.org/cgi-bin/oddmuse.cgi/openSUSE. All required
dependencies according to this list are confirmed installe
When I perform a procedure in pspp (for example NPAR TESTS /BINOMIAL ...) the
data come to the output window in F8.2 format. Is there a way to get greater
precision? (Tried "FORMATS" command, but this only seems to affect how
variables are displayed). Is this unchangeable, or may I apply something
Michel Boaventura wrote:
>
> Did you have the "dev" gtk and libglade packages?
>
> Yast says I do have installed gtk2 (v2.12.0-5.8), gtk2-devel,
> gtk2-engines, libglade2, libglade2-devel, libxml2, and libxml2-devel.
> "gtk+" is not an available package on the SuSE 10.3 repository, so I
> assu
Here is the config.log. Relevant part is probably:
checking for GTK... no
configure: WARNING: You must install gtk+ 2.0 v2.12 or later (or use
--without-gui) before building PSPP.
checking for GLADE... no
configure: WARNING: You must install libglade 2.0 v2.6.0 or later (or use
--without-gui) befo
Note: I also did an: "export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/usr/lib/:$PKG_CONFIG_PATH" in
root console just in case that was the problem. Evidently not as /.configure
is still missing gtk+ etc...
Hum, i guess gtk2 = gtk2+.
Can you please send your config.log file? Maybe it shows us where the
problem is.
SOLVED!
Successful configure occurred after entering following in root console:
export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/usr/lib/pkgconfig:$PKG_CONFIG_PATH
Verified the subsequent install worked as it does incorporate the new bugfix
I was looking for.
Frankly, it's not obvious to me why this worked. ;-)
--
ErikF wrote:
>
> When I perform a procedure in pspp the data come to the output window in
> F8.2 format. Is there a way to get greater precision? (Tried "FORMATS"
> command, but this only seems to affect how variables are displayed). Is
> this unchangeable, or may I
In future versions, would people prefer to see names or labels?
I personally lean toward names over labels here. This is a mildly annoying
feature I first noticed in spss. If you don't tend toward giving meaningful
names to variables I suppose the switch to names from labels could be
problematic,
