I just used a text file viewer ("less") and that's what it showed.
I'm attaching a version with the line ends changed to normal ones. I didn't
check that PSPP accepts it, but there is a better chance of that.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 10:45 AM Nanci Avitable
wrote:
> I forget exactly as I've been
I forget exactly as
I've been trying so many things. Most likely a cut and paste
from the original email (Mozilla Thunderbird). I can try typing
it in from scratch and seeing what happens.
Is there something I can turn on to see that for myself?
Yeah, it's full of weird Unicode U+2028 Line Separator characters.
Nanci, what did you use to create this file? It is a super weird text file
that I would not expect any normal text editor to produce.
[image: image.png]
On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 10:20 AM Nanci Avitable
wrote:
> The attached Work
The attached Workaround.sps is what I used based on Frans original
suggestion just minus the Data List command. It's pretty much what
you see in the output.
On 1/17/25 11:02 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
Those are good suggestions.
Multiple possibilities
to investigate. Right now need to prepare for a possible "Flash
Freeze." Xcel, our power company, cannot guarantee power over
the next 5 days.
Thanks Frans for the suggestions.
On 1/17/25 10:52 AM, Fra
Those are good suggestions.
Nanci, can you attach the syntax file, please?
On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 9:53 AM Frans Houweling wrote:
> Could it have to do with line endings or long lines, or character encoding
> (like utf-32 instead of utf-8)? That is what "1.215-1.225" (row 1 columns
> 215 to 225
Could it have to do with line endings or long lines, or character
encoding (like utf-32 instead of utf-8)? That is what "1.215-1.225" (row
1 columns 215 to 225) and
| ^~~
suggest to me.
On 1/17/25 18:31, Nanci Avitable wrote:
I'm afraid there might be something else going on which ma
I'm afraid there might
be something else going on which may have to do with the fact
that this is actually an intel based program and I'm running it
on a Mac silicon with Rosetta 2 installed. Rosetta is what
enables silicon Macs to run intell programs, the
Don't worry about the DATA LIST: just replace the define.. !enddefine part in your syntax. The DATA LIST and what follows was just there to show the macro works.Il 16 gen 2025 23:05, Nanci Avitable ha scritto:
Frans,
Thank you. I suspected that there might be a problem with Do
Frans,
Thank you. I suspected that there might be a problem with Do
Repeat.
I have tried your syntax, but it is not working as expected. I
wonder if there is a difference in the PSPP programs we are
using. Mine did not like the Da
It looks like I haven't tested !DEFINE with DO REPEAT, even though I
remember doing that.
There aren't any tests that exercise them together.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 12:30 PM Frans Houweling wrote:
>
> I'm afraid DO REPEAT does not work well inside DEFINE. Here is a workaround:
>
> define !subsco
I'm afraid DO REPEAT does not work well inside DEFINE. Here is a workaround:
define !subscore3 (!pos !tokens(1)/!pos !enclose('(',')')/!pos !tokens(1))
!LET !limits = !2
!DO !ssc = 1 !TO 19
!LET !limit = !HEAD(!limits)
!LET !limits = !TAIL(!limits)
if (!1 ge !limit) !3 = !ssc.
!DOEND
!endde
What was the original syntax?
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 10:16 AM Nanci Avitable wrote:
>
> I am working on a new MacBookPro, M4 chip with Sequoia. I have downloaded and
> installed the PSPP version 2.0.1-2 bundle.
>
> I have several SPSS programs that I use to score some protocols and output
> in
Maybe like this:
DO REPEAT ssc = 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 /
limit = 0 10 14 18 22 26 30 34 38 42 46 49 52 55 58 62 65 100 100.
IF (ctraw >= limit) ct = ssc.
END REPEAT.
EXECUTE.
On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 at 20:16, Nanci Avitable wrote:
> I am working on a new MacBookPro, M4 c
14 matches
Mail list logo
