>
> 2009/9/18
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> A teacher told me that he is worried about the Windows version of PSPP.
>> According to him I'm collaborating with Windows and fighting against Free
>> Software,
>> since with my binaries the users don't have to change to a open OS.
In my opinion switching applicat
I agree with your teacher on theoretical grounds, but practical
considerations may hinder you from writing for a totally free
system. This is the old question among activists: Should you adhere to
your virtues completely or change things incrementally by making
compromises? I heard from an old-time
Your teacher is a twit. Work with what you have.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Rodrigo Isaac wrote:
> +1
>
> Thesame way happens here in Nicaragua. We often don't recommend to use free
> software in a privative system, but if the person doesn't feels too sure
> about use GNU/Linux, well you c
Free software is about freedom. And freedom means not forcing anybody
to do anything. If a user understands the moral and practical problems
of Windoze and still chooses to use it, then that is their decision.
So personally, I don't have any problem with publically available windoze
binaries of
+1
Thesame way happens here in Nicaragua. We often don't recommend to use free
software in a privative system, but if the person doesn't feels too sure
about use GNU/Linux, well you can evangelize little by little.
I think also that free software is not only GNU/Linux.
And if you're going to pro
Hello,
A teacher told me that he is worried about the Windows version of PSPP.
According to him I'm collaborating with Windows and fighting against Free
Software,
since with my binaries the users don't have to change to a open OS.
I myself thing that any change must be gradual, and so make those
