On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 08:58:50PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
John Darrington writes:
> Another problem is their lack of peer review. I've been
> considering if it would be appropriate to submit something to
> http://www.jstatsoft.org They seem to be a reasonably reputable
John Darrington writes:
> Another problem is their lack of peer review. I've been
> considering if it would be appropriate to submit something to
> http://www.jstatsoft.org They seem to be a reasonably reputable
> journal, and apparently accept "white papers".
I'm willing to contribute to any s
Jason Stover,
Thank you, I've misspelled Ben Pfaff's name:
>Citing PSPP in Brazil - ABNT format (Brazilian Standards Association):
PFAFF, B.; DARRINGTON, J. et. al. GNU PSPP. versão 0.7.8. Boston: Free
Software Foundation, 2011. Disponível em
<http://www.gnu.org/software/pspp/
Arxiv might be an option midway between a URL and JStatSoft. But, depending
on the journal, once it's on arxiv, it may no longer be publishable. I am
from a physics background and the use of arxiv is not a problem (it is
encouraged). I am not sure what the ASA's policy on arxiv publications are.
h
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 10:10:19AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
Jason Stover writes:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 06:26:55PM -0400, David Sean wrote:
>> What is the preferred way to cite the use of PSPP in scientific
articles?
>
> It looks like no one has responded, so here
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 11:25:43PM -0200, Ronaldo Baltar wrote:
> Citing PSPP in Brazil - ABNT format (Brazilian Standards Association):
>
> PLAFF, B.; DARRINGTON, J. et. al. GNU PSPP. vers?o 0.7.8. Boston: Free
> Software Foundation, 2011. Dispon?vel em
> <http://www.gnu
Citing PSPP in Brazil - ABNT format (Brazilian Standards Association):
PLAFF, B.; DARRINGTON, J. et. al. GNU PSPP. versão 0.7.8. Boston: Free
Software Foundation, 2011. Disponível em
<http://www.gnu.org/software/pspp/> acessado em 07 nov. 2011, 17:50.
PLAFF, B.; DARRINGTON, J. et. al. GN
Hi PSPP users,
I can not really advise, but AFAIK there are some ways to cite a
software. A possible option is a reference to a user's guide document.
The link below points to an R-statistical forum, where it was originally
proposed.
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2008-November/179598.
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 10:10:19AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Jason Stover writes:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 06:26:55PM -0400, David Sean wrote:
> >> What is the preferred way to cite the use of PSPP in scientific articles?
> >
> > It looks like no one has responded, so here is my best attempt
Jason Stover writes:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 06:26:55PM -0400, David Sean wrote:
>> What is the preferred way to cite the use of PSPP in scientific articles?
>
> It looks like no one has responded, so here is my best attempt:
>
> There is no standard way to cite PSPP that I know of, but PSPP is
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 06:26:55PM -0400, David Sean wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> What is the preferred way to cite the use of PSPP in scientific articles?
It looks like no one has responded, so here is my best attempt:
There is no standard way to cite PSPP that I know of, but PSPP is part
of the GNU
Hello all,
What is the preferred way to cite the use of PSPP in scientific articles?
Thanks,
David
--
The future is here. It's just not widely distributed yet. - William Gibson
___
Pspp-users mailing list
Pspp-users@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.or
12 matches
Mail list logo