Thanks.
Our use case is Android app, so we can't provision queues beforehand.
Probably we need consider using proton-C via JNI from Java or look at other
ways.
Regards,
Yanfeng
-Original Message-
From: Julien Charon [mailto:julien.cha...@avitech.aero]
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 2
Hi Yanfeng,
I'm sorry, but we don't use temporary queues, I'm afraid I can't help you on
this.
Best regards,
Julien
Avitech GmbH
Engineering AxL
Tel.: +49 (0)7541/282-177
Fax: +49 (0)7541/282-199
e-mail: julien.cha...@avitech.aero
Avitech G
And I spoke too soon...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-958 - blocker.
Actually found this under 0.9.1, but definitely a problem for 0.10 that will
result in subtle hard to debug failures of the python install.
Got a proposed fix that I think is actually a better approach to the pr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14639440#comment-14639440
]
Ken Giusti commented on PROTON-958:
---
Reviewboard link:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/367
Ken Giusti created PROTON-958:
-
Summary: [python] pip installed binding fails to find correct
libqpid-proton.so
Key: PROTON-958
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-958
Project: Qpid Proton
Hi all,
We have a broker that uses proton-j 0.9.1 and we execute a test that does a
NULL lookup caused by the JMSSession.unsubscribe(name) call. The test passes
when using the QPID Proton JMS 0.3.0 but fails when run used the QPID legacy
JMS 0.32 with the following error:
javax.jms.JMSExceptio
Hi folks,
I wanted to draw attention of some proton-c literate folks to look at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6651 as so far the issue
looks like it could be on the proton-c side.
This was raised during a discussion on the qpid-users list:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/qpi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14638834#comment-14638834
]
Robbie Gemmell commented on PROTON-954:
---
Missing comments issue raised as INFRA-1003
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14638809#comment-14638809
]
Robbie Gemmell commented on PROTON-954:
---
Not sure why but the bot missed 4 other com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell resolved PROTON-954.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> miscelaneous cleanup
>
>
> Key: PROTO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14638718#comment-14638718
]
Robbie Gemmell commented on PROTON-955:
---
Not sure why the bot hasnt commented, but t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell resolved PROTON-955.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> [proton-j] only the payload for the current frame, and not the entire
> r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-957?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell resolved PROTON-957.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> [proton-j] make trace logging of transfer frames more useful
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell resolved PROTON-956.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> [proton-j] avoid some overhead when sending frames if the trace logging is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14638710#comment-14638710
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-954:
Commit 47
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14638708#comment-14638708
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-954:
Commit ff
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14638707#comment-14638707
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-956:
Commit 13
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-957?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14638709#comment-14638709
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-957:
Commit de
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14638711#comment-14638711
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-954:
Commit d3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell updated PROTON-955:
--
Description: Only the payload for the current frame, and not the entire
remainder for the delive
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell updated PROTON-955:
--
Summary: [proton-j] only the payload for the current frame, and not the
entire remainder for the
Robbie Gemmell created PROTON-957:
-
Summary: [proton-j] make trace logging of transfer frames more
useful
Key: PROTON-957
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-957
Project: Qpid Proton
Robbie Gemmell created PROTON-956:
-
Summary: [proton-j] avoid some overhead when sending frames if the
trace logging isnt enabled and there is no frame tracer
Key: PROTON-956
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/br
Robbie Gemmell created PROTON-955:
-
Summary: [proton-j] only the payload for the current frame, and
not the entire delivery, should be handed to the trace logging / frame tracer
Key: PROTON-955
URL: https://issues
Robbie Gemmell created PROTON-954:
-
Summary: miscelaneous cleanup
Key: PROTON-954
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-954
Project: Qpid Proton
Issue Type: Bug
Componen
Julien,
Sorry to hear your story with proton-J.
Can I ask you happened to know how to get the name of a temporary queue created
by proton-J program? See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-938 for
more details.
Regards,
Yanfeng
From: Julien Charon [mailto:julien.cha...@avitech.aero]
Hi everybody,
We are using proton-j Messenger to build clients that subscribe to an AMQP
broker to get messages from a queue.
It all works fine, we are getting messages and are able to process them.
However, we observe 2 behaviours concerning connections when the clients run
for a long time:
27 matches
Mail list logo