[protobuf] Fix for CVE-2022-3171

2023-01-18 Thread Ian Constantin
Hello, I wanted to ask which commit addresses CVE-2022-3171 from GHSA-h4h5-3hr4-j3g2 . Thank you in advance! Best, Ian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol

[protobuf] @(at) sign in import statemenq

2023-01-18 Thread 'David Sokhakyan' via Protocol Buffers
Hi All, Is there posabiliy to use @ sign in import statement in proto file definition? language is js, it just converts @ -> @ which is not allowed in js, example ... import "test/@test/test.proto"; thanks David Sokhakyan Senior Software Engineer www.questrade.com QuestGlobal Armenia LLC 105/1

Re: [protobuf] @(at) sign in import statemenq

2023-01-18 Thread 'David Sokhakyan' via Protocol Buffers
I try but it didnt work :) compilation phase is working but compiled source gives error var test_@test_pb = require(' test/@test/test_pb.js'); goog.object.extend(proto, test_@test_pb ); So var test_@test_pb is illegal in javascript On Wednesday, January 18, 2023 at 5:12:56 PM UTC+4 marc.g..

Re: [protobuf] Protobuf 3 optional vs FieldMasks

2023-01-18 Thread Jeff Sawatzky
After much trial and error, I've come to the conclusion that FieldMasks are still required if your resource has repeated or map fields. These can not be marked as optional and have no ability to check for presence. So in these cases you need a FieldMask, and in order to remain consistent in y