software languages, businesses, so-called
standards, best(worst) practices, individual agendas, personal 'skill
level', office politics, muddled technologies, and outright lies in our
industry, you do what you can to accomplish your goals. So by all means,
use TDD if you enjoy it
will not be able to 'fix' it from
your side.
-Charlie
On 8/2/2020 7:23 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote:
Right...we're using the API documentation from the vendor, doing it
according to what they say. It's not super quick but then again I
don't think most peop
you really need all 8
memo fields every time you pull data, this approach will probably hurt
performance (8 joins - very fast, but not as fast as pulling from 1 table).
-Charlie
On 10/5/2020 11:08 AM, Frank Cazabon wrote:
I "think" the way to do this is to copy the data to a new table
ly because I
have a different kind of laziness - once I design a system I NEVER want
to go back and change code. If a software change is required for any
other reason than a new requirement surfaced, it means I failed in my
design.
-Charlie
On 11/2/2020 7:25 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC
run the exe from Total Commander (or any File manager like Windows
Explorer)
I little bit of a pain I know, but that helped me avoid all kinds of
little issues and better emulate what would happen on target machines.
-Charlie
On 12/9/2020 12:08 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote:
Can we agre
I missed the link in the earlier email I think.
I'm interested.
-Charlie
On 3/3/2022 11:21 AM, Vince Teachout wrote:
On 03/03/22 5:53 AM, paul.newton.h...@gmail.com wrote:
Any more interest anybody?
Got it, thanks!
___
Post Messag
Thx much!
On 3/3/2022 4:58 PM, paul.newton.h...@gmail.com wrote:
This should be the one ...
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1-K64g4NuEJmk0patx_U80DZte6j9uMHJ?usp
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Charlie
Sent: 03 March 2022 21:55
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
If the field is indexed you can use SET SOFTSEEK. I think you'd then
have to do another check to ensure the value being pointed to is also
less than the upper bound.
HTH,
-Charlie
On 12/15/2023 5:08 PM, Paul H. Tarver wrote:
Been quiet in here for a while, so I thought I'
WSE
3) CHRTRAN out the "?" for the VFP BROWSE
So the VFP thing would be something like "BROWSE FOR
&(CHRTRAN(thewhere, "?", "")) note: I'm not sure you can do it all
at once. You may have to do the CHRTRAN() into another variable
that means you kinda need to be on a machine where it
is failing.
Good ol' MS "Where do you want your problem today?"
-Charlie
On 3/14/2017 3:40 PM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
RK - of course! That's what the original code essentially does!
So - here is a cut down version of the origi
On 7/24/2015 2:59 PM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
Good lord, all that text
Technically, a FAILOVER architecture does not require special processing
on the "end point" (aka client).
Anyway, did you use the ";Failover Partner=PartnerServerName" clause in
your SQL connec
r bottom dollar that companies like MS, and Apple are
looking for any way to discredit/attack Linux. In fact, this thing
smacks of Microsoft-ish "design": that is the software has a design flaw
so big it's practically useless. :)
-Charlie
On 2015-11-10 09:34, Stephen Russell wrote:
h
name]: File access denied").
I recommend opening the database (use the OPEN DATABASE command) before
performing the USE statement. And, in fact, if you do you that do not
need to path qualify the DBF (note: I always path qualify my OPEN
DATABASE though ).
-Charlie
_
ubfolders .
But hey, go ahead and think you're secure just because you're using SQL
Server or Oracle... or PostgreSQL... Nowadays technology folks aren't so
much about truth as they are about money and lying enough to themselves
to sleep at night.
-Charlie
You could maybe do another
query into MySQL, but if you've already pulled the data you need it'll
be way faster to work with machine-local data.
-Charlie
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.
a string coming out:
cNewStr = str(year(ddateval), 4) + "-" + strtran(str(month(ddateval),2),
" ", "0") + "-" + strtran(str(day(ddateval),2), " ", "0")
(I put the "STRTRAN" in there to force the day result to a 2-character
0-fi
Doesn't know VFP, doesn't want to do VFP, but he still spouts out stuff
on this list to VFP questions...
-Charlie
On 8/4/2016 11:14 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
Pretty much. A little consulting on the side but never realy wanted to
do VFP code. On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 6:20 PM,
wrote
a extract while saving
approach will work for that. Of course this assumes the SS isn't
constantly changing, or that your app is not changing the data in the
SS, etc; that would add a little more complexity, but still be quite
feasible.
HTH,
-Charlie
_
have to do some
"table-create-swap" thing. The default is 64 bytes. And be advised,
setting it to 1 thru 32 is not in bytes, it is in 512 byte chunks (SET
BLOCKSIZE to 1 is 512, setting to 2 is 1024, ... up to 32). After 32,
the number is interpreted as straight bytes.
Of course, as alw
the table in shared mode means EVERY save to the memo will
cause a NEW memo block to be appended to the .FPT file.
I was going to write up some code folks could run to show this behavior,
but didn't get to it. So the proof is left as a homework assignment. :)
-Charlie
_
tly
filling). Showed them good uses of relational integrity, triggers,
stored procedures, blah blah blah. Incredible, just incredible, the
level of stupidity in the computer industry today. But at least they
know MS-SQL server! ROFLMAO.
-Charlie
___
t dividing out the nanoseconds, get to seconds, and subtract the
value from the known date/time. Usually the epoch values are midnight of
January 1 of some year (e.g. Jan 1, 1801, 00:00:00am)... So if the
subtraction gets you close to something like that you know you're on the
right track.
n the database world
today.
-Charlie
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archi
u can plop them into the report. I will
often do a bunch of SCATTER MEMO oSomething before I do a REPORT FORM
command and I'll have oSomething., etc where I need it .
All the above said, using Report variables that are generated in the
REPORT FORM itself works fine as well. Bu
quot;USE
MYTABLE IN 0" will throw an error if the table was opened under another
alias. With the functions above, you could easily determine if the table
is actually open or not.
Also as others have mentioned, other applications can lock files (like
AV). Plus, if you allow ODBC acce
FPT (or SCX or FRX) files and see if the string is in there. You'd
at least know which Form/VCX/Report, etc has the potential to cause the
problem.
-Charlie
On 4/21/2014 3:14 PM, Fred Taylor wrote:
At the point that it fails, can you put up a messagebox or something that
shows you the value
ace tcp set global autotuninglevel=disabled
You probably will need admin rights to run this (of course you will, why
would MS make anything easy)
-Charlie
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/li
ld call
them an actual "response" - more like a pathetic plea. But as to why the
Apple ads weren't answered sooner well, it's difficult to argue with
truths that are so obvious to so many. And that's also probably why the MS
ads made little sense and w
is is going on.
I suppose no one likes to admit they have a "bug" in their code, but using
the term "by design" is inaccurate at best and deceptive at worst. A better
phrase would be "design limitation" or "code constraint".
Then again, expecting anything
he fossil record, and/or in
probability theory, it still may never adequately address the "first cause"
aspect you mention.
-Charlie
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT
At 06:19 PM 9/24/2008 -0400, Pete Theisen wrote:
>Charlie Coleman wrote:
> > At 04:45 PM 9/24/2008 -0400, Pete Theisen wrote:
> > ...
> >> Evolution is scientifically demonstrable, as I learned in Catholic
> >> school and studied further in Catholic university. T
y?"
At which point they fall silent. Then Linux gets some play.
Of course commercials and software are completely different. However, to
the PHB's out there, it's all jumbled together. So those commercials
probably opened the eyes of some of these PHB's and they're
At 02:30 PM 10/7/2008 -0500, Stephen Russell wrote:
><http://margaretandhelen.wordpress.com/2008/10/03/bitch-there-i-said-it/>
>
>Reminds me of my Grandmother.
Wow, I hope your grandmother isn't as senile as these ladies. They've
apparently lost their last finger-h
the hell they need to get off Windows as
soon as feasible.
:-)
-Charlie
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/prof
ystem to a new server?
For .Net, it's a royal pain (at least according to the .Net-heads I've
talked to at a client site - and I've seen problems at other client sites
as well). But maybe it could be simplified by using Norton Ghost or
something like that (hmmm
a to sell your stocks in beach product manufacturers.
;-)
-Charlie
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtec
aths, etc. MS can
really muck you up there with the later versions of Windows (aka path
'aliasing' or whatever to protect the c:\program files\ folder - tricking
the application to think it's reading a file from one place but actually
getting it from another - does anyone really in
quent
>runs
> > says "There is not enough memory to complete this operation."
...
Shot in the dark.
I think 65,000 array elements may still be a max. So if the file has more
than 65,000 lines.
-Charlie
___
Post Message
'm not exactly sure how VFP would handle the single-line
code above. It'd have to buffer the FILETOSTR() somewhere - and not sure
how/when that'd be released (maybe CLEAR MEMORY, but that's the whole
kit-n-kaboodle).
-Charlie
___
P
I thought they got some bad press for that last time.
I know it's silly to think you could prevent MS from updating your computer
without your permission (unless you put your own blocks on your I-net
connection ). But I thought they had backed off from doing that a bit
since they got
At 11:22 AM 8/11/2011 +0200, you wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone know if a tool exists to do this? Basically we want to compare
> > table structures and data differences with the ability to move the correct
> > data to the final production tables.
> >
Below is a quick thing I threw together to check ta
e definitely not protected.
You pretty much need a watchdog firewall, etc to keep MS from doing the
auto-updates. And I'm not sure, but I think MS can even circumvent local PC
firewalls at will (i.e. software firewalls. That may be an "enhanc
on't forget, this is all within their "legal" right according to their
license statement.
Of course, you could write your own app to monitor all files on the PC, but
then the damage'd be done by the time you recognized it anyway.
-Charlie
__
uming you meant they did not turn off
auto-updates). I think everyone realizes if you enable auto-updates you get
what you ask for - that is, auto-updates from MS which may or may not hose
your system or apps.
-Charlie
...
>On Aug 15, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Charlie Coleman wrote:
>
>
in profit. That's what companies do . We could expect the same
from Mac or any other proprietary system (I don't think Mac has done it
yet, but they could just the same). I'm not surprised they do stuff like
that, I'm surprised the "trained" compute
ith the SEEK
you just are moving it straight from the table to disk.
Note: the above is not tested and there are a lot of little things you'd
want to fill in, check, etc.
HTH,
-Charlie
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Main
r many sound tables you would ever expand to in an
application.
I read the original message as if the application were going to be
distributed to other computers, and that there were certain sounds that
would be played by the application based on the application's design/logic.
So my respon
should be able to
describe it myself.
So, sure, Google is funding itself by telling advertisers information about
the people doing searches, and offering to do the in-your-face ads. And
Google is probably trying to pass that off as "benefiting the consumer".
Sorry, no buy-in from me.
possible to
just share/map a drive to that computer from other computers on the network.
I'm not saying any one way is right or wrong, just curious what drove you
to RDT.
-Charlie
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
ow, just wait until the "promise" of the cloud is
interpreted as "Why pay these high-priced US techies to live in the US?"
-Charlie
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/p
)
copy structure to (cDataDir + cTbl2Zap) database (dbc()) with cdx
drop table (cTbl2Zap + "_tmpthing")
use (cTbl2Zap)
return
Of course, if ZAP was hitting an error, maybe the DROP TABLE would have
triggered the same thing?
-Charlie
t it.
Even though they don't actually get "support" the IT group has someone they
can blame and therefore keep their job.
-Charlie
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/p
n like they do in the PC OS.
Here is one site where I started reading about Carrier IQ:
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/hardware/so-theres-a-rootkit-hidden-in-millions-of-cellphones/16708?tag=nl.e539
-Charlie
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscrip
they may occasionally capture anonymous metric data as part of
your contract? Are you completely satisfied this software is only capturing
and sending anonymous information?
I'm not. But maybe I'm just too untrusting. After all, no company has
obtained personal data without clearly g
ypoint into your
.exe). I put it just before my READ EVENTS statement.
If you have a "form" set as your "main", I'd suggest putting this code in
the Activate Event.
-Charlie
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscrip
7;ve got a couple cases where
I'm messing with multi-millions of rows. I'll try it both ways and see how
significant the difference is.
-Charlie
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/
o corps won't get surprised by some
uninstall, or that this is just prelim stuff, or that Apple and Google have
malicious app kill switches for phones - so why can't MS do it, etc. Don't
waste electrons. If you really don't think this is a concern you're too far
up MS'
At 08:21 AM 12/22/2011 -0600, Stephen Russell wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Charlie Coleman wrote:
> > You all may find this interesting:
> >
> >
> http://www.windows8news.com/2011/12/08/microsoft-remotely-delete-windows-8-apps/
> >
> > I'm no
e each day (thank God I don't
use that POS any more).
:-D
-Charlie
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/pro
roup all "A's",
"B's", etc, or on a complex criteria - like IIF(MOD(recno()+1, 41)=0, 1,
2)). Then, then you can define your report variables to sum values in
the groups and reset when group changes, etc. Place those variables in the
group footer, and so on
-Charlie
on
tieing everyone into their specific software (which is to be expected of
course). And what is really the key - more and more people are starting to
wake up and realize it.
-Charlie
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
ot
set to highlight the whole thing. So in my class code I've got the following:
IF THIS.SelectOnEntry == .T.
THIS.SetFocus()
ENDIF
HTH,
-Charlie
At 03:37 PM 7/22/2008 -0400, Vince Teachout wrote:
>Stephen Russell wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:23 PM, John
's the standard type of MS response - reply with
some kind of marketing statement, no help provided.
;-)
-Charlie
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of t
to think
about too.
But as you say, the guy may be locked in (a lot like I was) to his number.
You can't do much in that case other than try to keep the most cohesive
code together where possible.
-Charlie
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@l
Also make sure that the strings in the MEMVAR do not evaluate to greater
than 240 characters.
-Charlie
At 07:51 AM 8/21/2008 +0100, Dave Crozier wrote:
>John,
>I think the problem may well lie in the format of the date field between the
>PC and the index.
>
>Look at your "
hook that deep, you're a goner
anyway.
:-)
-Charlie
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchab
At 12:38 PM 8/21/2008 -0500, Stephen Russell wrote:
><http://www.devtopics.com/hello-im-a-pc-says-seinfeld/>
Well, it is certainly apropos to have a comedian in MS commercials. Because
MS, and all those that drink its coolaid are... well laughable.
>> > > Error building key for index "c:\abc\shipment.cdx" tag
>> "Locitemdat."
>> > >
>> > >The SHIPMENT table has an index tag called LOCITEMDAT that is made up of
>> > >LOCATION+ITEM+DTOC(SHIPDATE). LOCATION
n't seen the once-per-month scenario. Of the 2 XP machines I have
I've wiped one of them once and another of them twice in the past 3 or so
years (maybe that's why they're not performing very well at the moment
hmm). It certainly is a huge pain to wipe 'em.
-C
kfully I don't have to do that any more, those folks
are now on the OOo bandwagon).
-Charlie
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe
all the new security holes introduced by SP3
;-)
-Charlie
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Arc
read, Leland, do you have any
sources that directly refute any of the information Bob had provided?
-Charlie
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://l
Careful Michael, calling a trivial technology "revolutionary" is
dangerously close to M$'s marketing strategy. You may find yourself the
target of a copyright infringement lawsuit.
;-)
-Charlie
At 12:00 PM 8/27/2008 -0700, Michael Madigan wrote:
>This is a revolut
to recall that NASA is building lots of systems using Linux
and making lots of future plans to use it. It seems the "rocket scientists"
have spoken. I wonder how long it'll take for the "ordinary" person to hear.
:-)
-Charlie
___
At 09:00 PM 8/27/2008 +0100, Paul Newton wrote:
>Charlie
>
>I don't think hyperbole is subject to copyright :)
Then how the heck can MS copyright anything
:P
-Charlie
>Charlie Coleman wrote:
> > Careful Michael, calling a trivial technology "revolutionary"
go work for a non-profit (or not-for-profit), your
mentality should be one of "serving" not "being served"
That may be difficult for MS-heads to understand, but there are actually
people out there that want to do things for others and require the absolute
dical than some
of the more widely known groups such as the Libertarian Party.
Now, if it was found out that Palin has some friends that are, say, members
of the KKK, then yeah, that would truly be significant and comparable.
-Charlie
___
Post Messag
ing the BIG BUCKS! (All you DotNet guys get the premium pay,
>right? )
Nah, the MS evangelicals are having meetings all month, trying to figure
out a way to save the company. I got the memo (not sure why though, I
removed myself from their "fanatics" list many years ago -
At 01:02 PM 9/4/2008 -0400, MB Software Solutions General Account wrote:
>On Thu, September 4, 2008 1:48 pm, Charlie Coleman wrote:
> > Nah, the MS evangelicals are having meetings all month, trying to figure
> > out a way to save the company. I got the memo (not sure why though
e that direct table access is not
advised. Even when editing a single record I use the SCATTER MEMO NAME ...
approach. Maybe this is why I've never had problems with VFP DB corruption
but others have and it's certainly why I've never had
ndy in
other situations. E.g. the single record stuff - SCATTER...NAME because
then you're got an object you can pass around. It makes it easier to create
encapsulated code with high cohesion and low coupling, IMO.
-Charlie
>--- On Fri, 9/5/08, Charlie Coleman <[EMAIL PROTEC
At 10:54 AM 9/9/2008 -0400, Malcolm Greene wrote:
>Looking for recommendations regarding a memory reseller - any thoughts?
>Thanks!
>Malcolm
You can have mine. It doesn't seem to be working well for me lately.
:-)
-Charlie
___
Po
as been
sounding a lot like ICOTUA members for over a year.
Are you starting to see where the real problem is Bill?
-Charlie
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of
if what you're doing is a sort of once-in-a-while type thing the
performance over SQL probably won't be noticeable. But if it's in a tight
loop of a hundred thousand or so clients, using the benefits of VFP and its
index structure may be significant.
-Charlie
> > *There&
At 04:26 PM 3/19/2010 -0500, Stephen Russell wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Charlie Coleman wrote:
>
> > Anyway, if what you're doing is a sort of once-in-a-while type thing the
> > performance over SQL probably won't be noticeable. But if it's in a tig
ord.
And note that nowhere did I say that I would not do the SQL code. I simply
showed another alternative that is available for investigation since they
have the power of VFP at hand instead of SQL only.
> > I bet it's driving you INSANE that the world is still on TCP/IP.
>
>
op-posting" because
they expect immediate responses - so in their mind the thread is fresh.
-Charlie
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list
xtort money and
power away from people (which, from what I can see, is the actual hidden
agenda of those driving the man-made global warming scare tactics).
-Charlie
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mai
can be trusted?
Wow. Just... wow.
I've been using ZA as well for many years. But since I haven't been forced
to go to Windows Vista or 7 yet, I may not have hit your problems. But it's
interesting that a "watchdog" software package would suddenly start having
problem
Also check the font settings (the VFP Tools > Options menu). Go to the
IDE tab and you can change font characteristics, etc.
HTH,
-Charlie
On 2/7/2019 4:00 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote:
SET MEMOWIDTH TO 132
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com]
systems store their data in ... files.
It sounds like some very insidious code has infected their server. I'd
recommend a complete wipe before a restore (or at least verify boot
sectors or any other root/bootup software, etc).
-Charlie
___
Haha! Fate is watching!
I wish you a speedy recovery Ed. Take care.
-Charlie
On 2/23/2019 10:20 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
Ok, this is a stretch, but this past Monday I had my left knee replaced. It's a
long story [0], but I got a kick out of the fact that my surgeon's name was
Fox! [1]
of
doing the backup, you could just do the "COPY FILE TO " -
that command allows paths in the from/to. Also, I think it allows
wildcards, so you could do a complete copy in 1 command. Of course, the
downside is the assumption of files being closed.
-HTH,
-Charlie
On 2/27/2019 12
of
doing the backup, you could just do the "COPY FILE TO " -
that command allows paths in the from/to. Also, I think it allows
wildcards, so you could do a complete copy in 1 command. Of course, the
downside is the assumption of files being closed.
-HTH,
-Charlie
---
ot;user" operation and so could be avoided during the
backup process.
It goes without saying, before using in production, this code should be
thoroughly tested, customized, etc.
HTH,
-Charlie
PS. Please don't make fun of my variable names - I was in a hurry when I
gen'd this up
th a little... So let me say, pick up any of the
"newer" platforms. For me, the best way to learn them is not necessarily
"courses" (nor "certification programs"), but to build something "real"
with them. If you land this job, you can help the employer in
, not a lot of noise, and
quite light in my opinion.
I'm thinking about an Origin laptop for my next one (but still a ways
off to buy) - impressive specs, generally good reviews, lots of
customizing available. But expensive and not sure the brand is tried and
true as the big names.
-
explicit). Other than that, perhaps a particular DBMS
would "optimize better" with INNER JOIN or WHERE - but I kind of doubt it.
-Charlie
On 4/2/2019 6:05 PM, Garrett Fitzgerald wrote:
Hey, all. I had a general SQL question. Often, I find myself needing to use
the syntax:
FROM a
L
Hey Eric,
What do you mean? I have not run into a SQL DBMS that does not support
both WHERE and INNER JOIN.
-Charlie
On 4/3/2019 4:35 PM, Eric Selje wrote:
Just be aware that VFP's SQL lets you get away with that, but not all
incarnations of SQL will.
Eric
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at
but I have
not experienced that even with my most complicated "WHERE" clauses (of
course, like all my code, I sometimes do not get the statement correct on
the first try, but that can happen with my "JOINS" as well as my "WHERES"
).
-Charlie
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 5:3
1 - 100 of 590 matches
Mail list logo
