The term 'fanny pack' is *so* hilarious on this side of the Atlantic.
Also the name
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free
Apart from the general contempt I feel for people who continually bring this
non-issue up time and time again I an amused by the notion of what would
happen if Obama were retrospectively disqualified. So come on... tell me
what you think would happen. Let's start with a few facts.
every bill Obam
geoff wrote:
> Apart from the general contempt I feel for people who continually bring this
> non-issue up time and time again I an amused by the notion of what would
> happen if Obama were retrospectively disqualified.
Hi Geoff,
Interesting question. What WOULD happen is that there would be an a
As an aside, if you don't have a land line... how are you getting your
internet connectivity at a reasonable cost?
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: ht
Cable ?
Just as cheap or expensive as a land line over here...and faster.
A+
jml
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Adam Buckland
wrote:
>
> As an aside, if you don't have a land line... how are you getting your
> internet connectivity at a reasonable cost?
___
Aaah... can't get cable where I am... don't even get a TV signal without
satellite .. even with cable though and broadband you still get a
landline don't you?
-Original Message-
From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On
Behalf Of Jean Laeremans
Sent: 05 January 20
Hi Dr. Stan,
Forget nukes, we are going to bomb, and be bombed, by pigs.
http://www.takepart.com/article/2011/11/10/swine-warfare-are-feral-pigs-next-weapon-mass-destruction
On the other hand, cooking to an internal temperature of at least 137 F
. . . That and a good repeating rifle.
Personall
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Adam Buckland
wrote:
> Aaah... can't get cable where I am... don't even get a TV signal without
> satellite .. even with cable though and broadband you still get a
> landline don't you?
Yes , VOIP.
In our French house - small village in the middle of nowhere - we
Jean Laeremans wrote:
> Cable ?
> Just as cheap or expensive as a land line over here...and faster.
>
> A+
> jml
>
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Adam Buckland
> wrote:
>> As an aside, if you don't have a land line... how are you getting your
>> internet connectivity at a reasonable cost?
H
Pete Theisen wrote:
> Hi Dr. Stan,
>
> Forget nukes, we are going to bomb, and be bombed, by pigs.
>
> http://www.takepart.com/article/2011/11/10/swine-warfare-are-feral-pigs-next-weapon-mass-destruction
>
> On the other hand, cooking to an internal temperature of at least 137 F
> . . . That an
Jean Laeremans wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Adam Buckland
> wrote:
>> Aaah... can't get cable where I am... don't even get a TV signal without
>> satellite .. even with cable though and broadband you still get a
>> landline don't you?
>
> Yes , VOIP.
> In our French house - small vil
What a sad day. Nothing like the smell of opening up a fresh cartridge of
film from the yellow box. Polaroid is in Chapter 11 and now Kodak will join
them.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203471004577140841495542810.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories
I use SuddenLink, here in Abilene, Texas as my ISP. They provide me
with a Cisco 2100 Cable Modem, static IP address, and their Fiber Optic
infrastructure. I don't use SuddenLink's computers located in there
business center, which is SuddenLink's usual method of hosting a
business. I run my
Whoops, I forgot to mention that I pay SuddenLink $73.66 per month for
their services.
Regards,
LelandJ
On 01/05/2012 08:49 AM, lelandj wrote:
> I use SuddenLink, here in Abilene, Texas as my ISP. They provide me
> with a Cisco 2100 Cable Modem, static IP address, and their Fiber Optic
> infr
Times are changing. The digital age is exerting itself into the 22
century. Attendance and revenue at movie theaters are being impacted,
as people are choosing to stay at home and watch movies streamed from
Netflex, and other similar businesses.
Regards,
LelandJ
On 01/05/2012 05:31 AM, Mich
Whoops, that should be 21 century. LOL
Regards,
LelandJ
On 01/05/2012 09:03 AM, lelandj wrote:
> Times are changing. The digital age is exerting itself into the 22
> century. Attendance and revenue at movie theaters are being impacted,
> as people are choosing to stay at home and watch movie
I have an application that reads SQL Server tables on terminal
services. My customer is upgrading to Windows 2008 Server 64 bit. I
understand that VFP9 will run fine on it, but I have read of problems
working with the 64 bit SQL Server tables.
Is this an issue? If it is, is there a way to wo
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> I have an application that reads SQL Server tables on terminal
> services. My customer is upgrading to Windows 2008 Server 64 bit. I
> understand that VFP9 will run fine on it, but I have read of problems
> working with the 64 bit SQL Server
> Forget nukes, we are going to bomb, and be bombed, by pigs.
>
Want to clear your land of some tree stumps???
Get pigs
Drill a 2' hole into the base and drop some corn down in the hole
the pigs will work that stump until it's nearly out of the ground and
you can then just hook onto th
Pigs: the new "sheep".
You'll have to go back a few years in the archives to find the reference...
RIP: JK
Lou
-Original Message-
From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On
Behalf Of Jarvis, Matthew
> Forget nukes, we are going to bomb, and be bombed,
What are you hearing? I haven't had any problems with 64 or 32-bit SQL. I
only have a few VFP applications left though, and everything in them goes
through Stored Procs.
Lou
-Original Message-
From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On
Behalf Of Jef
I guess what I heard was regarding ODBC and connection strings don't use
ODBC, right? I don't understand all I know about this. ;^)
Jeff
---
Jeff Johnson
j...@san-dc.com
(623) 582-0323
www.san-dc.com
On 01/05/2012 09:52 AM, Lou Syracuse wrote:
> What are you hearing? I haven
http://connectionstrings.com/sql-server-2008
lcConnectionString =
"Provider=SQLNCLI10;Server=myServerAddress;Database=myDataBase;Uid=myUsername;
Pwd=myPassword;"
nHandle = SQLStringConnect(lcConnectionString)
That should be all.
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> I guess wh
lelandj wrote:
> Whoops, that should be 21 century. LOL
Hi Leland,
Why wait?
> On 01/05/2012 09:03 AM, lelandj wrote:
>> Times are changing. The digital age is exerting itself into the 22
>> century. Attendance and revenue at movie theaters are being impacted,
>> as people are choosing to sta
Thank you Grigore!
Jeff
---
Jeff Johnson
j...@san-dc.com
(623) 582-0323
www.san-dc.com
On 01/05/2012 11:02 AM, Grigore Dolghin wrote:
> http://connectionstrings.com/sql-server-2008
>
> lcConnectionString =
> "Provider=SQLNCLI10;Server=myServerAddress;Database=myDataBase;Uid=myUser
Lou Syracuse wrote:
> Pigs: the new "sheep".
>
> You'll have to go back a few years in the archives to find the reference...
> RIP: JK
>
> Lou
Hi Lou,
Indeed, 2005.
http://leafe.com/archives/msg/275048
> -Original Message-
> From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun..
On 01/05/2012 12:05 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
> lelandj wrote:
>> Whoops, that should be 21 century. LOL
> Hi Leland,
>
> Why wait?
I think of the 21 century as the coming of age of the digital
revolution. Movies, news, music, pictures, etc. are all moving toward
digital delivery and presentatio
(VFP9SP2 with .dbf/.dbc backend)
User submitted error report (automatically) that recorded error as Error
2115: : Execution of function or command is not allowed in context of
SQL command.
I look for that error in VFP help and what do ya know...there is no
listing for Error 2115!
Ugh...
--
> (VFP9SP2 with .dbf/.dbc backend)
>
> User submitted error report (automatically) that recorded error as
Error
> 2115: : Execution of function or command is not allowed in context of
> SQL command.
>
> I look for that error in VFP help and what do ya know...there is no
> listing for Error 2115!
lelandj wrote:
> On 01/05/2012 12:05 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
>> lelandj wrote:
>>> Whoops, that should be 21 century. LOL
>> Hi Leland,
>>
>> Why wait?
>
> I think of the 21 century as the coming of age of the digital
> revolution. Movies, news, music, pictures, etc. are all moving toward
> di
On 1/5/2012 1:28 PM, Jarvis, Matthew wrote:
>> (VFP9SP2 with .dbf/.dbc backend)
>>
>> User submitted error report (automatically) that recorded error as
> Error
>> 2115: : Execution of function or command is not allowed in context of
>> SQL command.
>>
>> I look for that error in VFP help and what
>
> Is this an issue? If it is, is there a way to work around it?
>
The ODBC driver doesn't work when the server is configured to only listen
on shared memory. You need to enable the TCP/IP listener, as well.
Christof
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
tex
There are multiple reasons why he may not be US citizen
1. The birth certificate has not been authenticated nor have they allowed
forensic experts to view it. The digital scans of it have either been proven
to be photoshops or have serious inconsistencies.
2. If the birth certificate is g
On 1/5/2012 2:41 PM, Nicholas Geti wrote:
> http://visiontoamerica.org/6906/breaking-georgia-court-to-hear-natural-born-citizen-case-vs-obama/
>
> I doubt that it will do any good but at least some people are still trying to
> make Obama's birth certificate null and void.
I'm sure Hilary is stand
On 1/5/2012 6:31 AM, Michael Madigan wrote:
> What a sad day. Nothing like the smell of opening up a fresh cartridge of
> film from the yellow box. Polaroid is in Chapter 11 and now Kodak will join
> them.
>
>
> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203471004577140841495542810.html?mo
On 1/5/2012 4:45 AM, Adam Buckland wrote:
>
> As an aside, if you don't have a land line... how are you getting your
> internet connectivity at a reasonable cost?
I just get DSL from Verizon at about $32/month.
--
Mike Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
President, Chief Software Architect
MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote:
> On 1/5/2012 2:41 PM, Nicholas Geti wrote:
>> http://visiontoamerica.org/6906/breaking-georgia-court-to-hear-natural-born-citizen-case-vs-obama/
>>
>> I doubt that it will do any good but at least some people are still trying
>> to make Obama's birth certificate
Companies rise and fall, not many can continue to evolve.
The bailout for the banks and auto makers would be like requiring people to buy
film cameras and film to bail out Kodak. Time has passed Kodak by. IT's a
shame because it was always voted among the best companies to work for.
Who c
Not in France its not
Al
-Original Message-
The term 'fanny pack' is *so* hilarious on this side of the Atlantic.
Also the name
--
Alan Bourke
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listi
On 01/05/2012 01:13 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
> lelandj wrote:
>> On 01/05/2012 12:05 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
>>> lelandj wrote:
Whoops, that should be 21 century. LOL
>>> Hi Leland,
>>>
>>> Why wait?
>> I think of the 21 century as the coming of age of the digital
>> revolution. Movies, news,
I have nothing but contempt for socialists who claim this is the way it is
because it would be too onerous to undo what's done. You are building a
windmill that is irrelevant. Nothing will be undone. Very few of the things
you mention has anything to do with Obama signing the bills passed by
Co
I love hearing from constitutional scholars that have no clue what they are
talking about. Don't let that stop you from rambling on tho, Geoff.
Michael Oke, II
661-349-6221
Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient.
On Jan 5, 2012, at 12:42 AM, "geoff" wr
Nicholas Geti wrote:
> I have nothing but contempt for socialists who claim this is the way it is
> because it would be too onerous to undo what's done. You are building a
> windmill that is irrelevant. Nothing will be undone. Very few of the things
> you mention has anything to do with Obama si
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free
I find this so appalling that I cannot believe he is so arrogant as to try it.
Every dictator from Hitler to Papa Doc and every one in between started out the
same way. First one little thing then another until they had total control. The
socialists stood there applauding when he made the announ
So you really want to believe that laws signed into existence by an
ineligible President would remain? do you really think that woudl succeed in
the Supreme Court for longer than 5 seconds? The silliness is people who
seem to think that they can retrospectively invalidate an entire presidency
and t
At least when the Democrats lose they accept the decision. Republicans get
the Supreme Court to change the rules or then spend years trying to
invalidate a winner. Perhaps you could try developing proper policies and
people and things to do when you win rather than trying to undermine
winners.
--
Never said that it wouldn't change some things just that, as a whole, your rant
is wrong.
What I want has nothing to do with it.
Your characterization of the law not withstanding, it is the law and he didn't
try to change it, he ran knowing what it said.
Michael Oke, II
661-349-6221
Conten
> While you are snoozing, all that $ the US was sending to various
> euro-snob countries in various guises is being diverted to Chicago.
> Should be all done by the time Europe wakes up.
>
> Thus, not only the US will be screwed, but the Euros as well. Hail
> (Heil?) Obama!
> --
I'll let him know.
geoff wrote:
> At least when the Democrats lose they accept the decision. Republicans get
> the Supreme Court to change the rules or then spend years trying to
> invalidate a winner. Perhaps you could try developing proper policies and
> people and things to do when you win rather than trying to un
Jean Laeremans wrote:
>> While you are snoozing, all that $ the US was sending to various
>> euro-snob countries in various guises is being diverted to Chicago.
>> Should be all done by the time Europe wakes up.
>>
>> Thus, not only the US will be screwed, but the Euros as well. Hail
>> (Heil?) Oba
I remember running into this in my last conversion many years ago, and i can't
remember what the trick it.
I am creating an EXE that just calls a menu. In that menu, each menu item
calls another exe. When I execute the program, it blinks on and then off. I
remember there was a trick to preve
I think you have to change if a form is
modal or not.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
-Original Message-
From: Michael Madigan
Sender: profox-boun...@leafe.com
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 15:15:50
To: Pro Fox Email List
Reply-To: ProFox Email List
Subject: What's the trick to get an exe not to b
There are no forms in the executable, just a menu
From: Rick Q
To: ProFox Email List
Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2012 6:18 PM
Subject: Re: What's the trick to get an exe not to blink off?
I think you have to change if a form is
modal or not.
Sent via BlackBer
Read events?
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
-Original Message-
From: Michael Madigan
Sender: profox-boun...@leafe.com
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 15:19:25
To: ProFox Email List
Reply-To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: What's the trick to get an exe not to blink off?
There are no forms in the ex
What kind of moron am I?
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/se
Oops, should have been [OT], but I clicked the wrong address. Why? Because I'm
a moron.
On 1/5/12 3:26 PM, Paul McNett wrote:
> What kind of moron am I?
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Mainte
I'm thinking a dummy modal form that executes the menu
From: "desmond.ll...@gmail.com"
To: ProFox Email List
Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2012 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: What's the trick to get an exe not to blink off?
Read events?
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
-
The crybaby speaker has no balls or else he would immediately introduce
articles of impeachment.
From: Nicholas Geti
To: profox@leafe.com
Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2012 4:50 PM
Subject: [OT] Obama Stages Power Grab from Congress
I find this so appalling tha
READ EVENTS immediately after Do myMenu.mpr, and a CLEAR EVENTS somewhere
in the menu's Exit pad.
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Michael Madigan wrote:
> I'm thinking a dummy modal form that executes the menu
>
>
>
> From: "desmond.ll...@gmail.com"
> To: ProFox
Geoff knows more about American Constitutional Law than we do, or so he says.
From: "Michael Oke, II"
To: ProFox Email List
Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2012 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] Georgia Court takes case of Obama citizenship
I love hearing from constitut
Michael Madigan wrote:
>I remember running into this in my last conversion many years ago, and
>i can't remember what the trick it.
>
>I am creating an EXE that just calls a menu. In that menu, each menu
>item calls another exe. When I execute the program, it blinks on and
>then off. I remembe
I tried a dummy modal form and that works. I'll try the other suggestions
too. Thank you
From: Tracy Pearson
To: ProFox Email List
Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2012 6:31 PM
Subject: Re: What's the trick to get an exe not to blink off?
Michael Madigan wrot
Sure. Abortion became legal because some pig who wanted to kill her baby took
it to the supreme court instead of just having the laws changed.
From: geoff
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2012 5:11 PM
Subject: RE: [OT] Georgia Court takes
Paul McNett wrote:
Hi Paul,
Ah, but you have a pass - Ted likes you.
> Oops, should have been [OT], but I clicked the wrong address. Why? Because
> I'm a moron.
>
>
> On 1/5/12 3:26 PM, Paul McNett wrote:
>> What kind of moron am I?
>>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
__
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
> This is the most revealing aspect of it - the millions and millions
> Bammer has spent to keep it out of court!
>
> Probably more than a billion by now. If he has nothing to hide, why is
> he going to so much trouble to hide it?
> --
Can you
>> I understand that VFP9 will run fine on it, but I have read of problems
>> working with the 64 bit SQL Server tables.<<
The biggest problem is making sure that you use the 32-bit driver. Most often
the problem is noticed when someone sets
up a DSN in the ODBC Manager, which is 64-bit. The VFP
Stephen Russell wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
>
>> This is the most revealing aspect of it - the millions and millions
>> Bammer has spent to keep it out of court!
>>
>> Probably more than a billion by now. If he has nothing to hide, why is
>> he going to so much tr
Stephen Russell wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
>
>> This is the most revealing aspect of it - the millions and millions
>> Bammer has spent to keep it out of court!
>>
>> Probably more than a billion by now. If he has nothing to hide, why is
>> he going to so much tr
69 matches
Mail list logo
