rk in either of the two?
> >
> > They did not give me any advance warning (g)
> >
> > To clarify, this is a very old system that uses dbf's.
> > I located the dbfs in a windows server folder back in 2012 and each
> > computer in the LAN has its ow
Server 2019 or WS 2023
>
> Will Visual FoxPro still work in either of the two?
>
> They did not give me any advance warning (g)
>
> To clarify, this is a very old system that uses dbf's.
> I located the dbfs in a windows server folder back in 2012 and each
> co
in a windows server folder back in 2012 and each
computer in the LAN has its own compiled version (exe) of the main program
and each of them accesses the dbf's.
The real question then is whether it will be possible for the individual
PC's to access the dbf's located in a folder in eith
Excellent Alan - many thanls
Paul
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Alan Bourke
Sent: 10 June 2020 14:19
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] Forgotten password on Windows Server 2019 Hyper-V VM
Sent by an external sender
--
https
e 2020 14:02
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] Forgotten password on Windows Server 2019 Hyper-V VM
Sent by an external sender
--
There are approaches out there involving booting from the install media and
using the utilman utility, if you Google them.
Do y
Hi all
Well I suppose the subject says it all - I really don't want to have to set it
all up again from scratch, so any suggestions as to how I can reset or bypass
the password would be very welcome. Many thanks.
Paul Newton
___
Post Messages to: P
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5FFrxb9vwg
utilman.exe is part of Windows so this approach should be OK
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mail
There are approaches out there involving booting from the install media and
using the utilman utility, if you Google them.
Do you have any RDP shortcuts that would have the password saved or anything
maybe ?
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
___
r.
>
> Thierry Nivelet
> FoxInCloud
> Give your VFP app a second life in the cloud
> http://foxincloud.com/
>
>
> Le 13/11/2017 à 20:19, Fred Taylor a écrit :
>
>> Does anyone know if VFP9 .EXEs can run on Windows Server 2016? I don't
>> mean just access data
Windows Server 2016? I don't
mean just access data on the server, actual run a runtime .EXE application
on the server itself/
Thanks,
Fred
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
[excessive quoting removed by s
180 days free evaluation?
>
> https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/evalcenter/evaluate-windows-server-2016
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> ---
> This communication and the information it contains is intended for the
> person or org
Why not try it yourself in a VM - 180 days free evaluation?
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/evalcenter/evaluate-windows-server-2016
Dave
---
This communication and the information it contains is intended for the person
or
oFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] Im Auftrag von Fred Taylor
> Gesendet: Montag, 13. November 2017 21:15
> An: ProFox Email List
> Betreff: Re: VFP9 can run on Windows Server 2016?
>
> Hi wOOdy,
>
> I don't currently have a Server 2016 setup, we're getting new ser
Maybe that's what he was talking about, the "Nano Server".
Thanks Ted.
Fred
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Fred Taylor wrote:
> > Hi wOOdy,
> >
> > I don't currently have a Server 2016 setup, we're getting new servers in
> a
> > couple of
Thanks Alan.
Fred
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Alan Bourke
wrote:
> Fred
>
> Absolutely.
>
> --
> Alan Bourke
> alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
>
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, at 07:19 PM, Fred Taylor wrote:
> > Does anyone know if VFP9 .EXEs can run
9.exe (plus
vfp9.dll)
Viola! :)
wOOdy
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] Im Auftrag von Fred Taylor
Gesendet: Montag, 13. November 2017 21:15
An: ProFox Email List
Betreff: Re: VFP9 can run on Windows Server 2016?
Hi wOOdy,
I don't curren
Fred
Absolutely.
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, at 07:19 PM, Fred Taylor wrote:
> Does anyone know if VFP9 .EXEs can run on Windows Server 2016? I don't
> mean just access data on the server, actual run a runtime .EXE
> application
&
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Fred Taylor wrote:
> Hi wOOdy,
>
> I don't currently have a Server 2016 setup, we're getting new servers in a
> couple of months and want to go with the latest. Someone told me server
> 2016 could not run 32 bit apps, only 64 bit, that's why I asked.
>
>
Hi, Fred:
t;
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] Im Auftrag von Fred Taylor
> Gesendet: Montag, 13. November 2017 20:20
> An: ProFox Email List
> Betreff: VFP9 can run on Windows Server 2016?
>
> Does anyone know if VFP9 .EXEs can run on Win
lto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] Im Auftrag von Fred Taylor
Gesendet: Montag, 13. November 2017 20:20
An: ProFox Email List
Betreff: VFP9 can run on Windows Server 2016?
Does anyone know if VFP9 .EXEs can run on Windows Server 2016? I don't
mean just access data on the server, actual run a runt
Does anyone know if VFP9 .EXEs can run on Windows Server 2016? I don't
mean just access data on the server, actual run a runtime .EXE application
on the server itself/
Thanks,
Fred
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
Thanks. I will leave it alone.
From: Dave Crozier
To: ProFox Email List
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 8:00 AM
Subject: RE: Windows server shows open Foxpro files when none should be open
I agree with Alan. It is a little drastic to disable the caching just to get a
correct
uyer the seller shall be entitled at any
time
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Alan Bourke
Sent: 24 October 2017 12:12
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Windows server shows open Foxpro files when none should be open
If you can open them a
If you can open them as and when you need, and exclusively if you have
to, then why sweat it? Could be indexing, AV, anything that like that
which has a filter driver installed. I certainly wouldn't go messing
with server settings unless it's causing you a problem.
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke
ler shall be entitled at any
time
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan
Sent: 24 October 2017 11:57
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Windows server shows open Foxpro files when none should be open
This is weird,
Under computer management->
th no error.
They eventually go away, but it's 5 or more minutes later.
I'm using Foxpro for Windows 2.6 and Windows Server 2008. I don't ever
remember seeing this behavior before.
Any ideas?
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain
On 2017-07-11 15:13, Tracy Pearson wrote:
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote on 2017-07-11:
On 2017-06-08 13:57, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
wrote:
UPDATE FROM CLIENT:
"[Local IT guy] suggested trying to run the program in Windows 7
Compatibility mode. We tri
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote on 2017-07-11:
>> On 2017-06-08 13:57, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
> UPDATE FROM CLIENT:
>
> "[Local IT guy] suggested trying to run the program in Windows 7
> Compatibility mode. We tried that on several machines, incl
On 2017-06-08 13:57, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
Heard from client's Tech guy. Apparently the Server 2016 has been in
place for awhile. No problem when my app accessed from Windows 7
clients; problems only started with the introduction of the Windows 10
clients.
UPDATE
On 2017-07-06 03:38, Dave Crozier wrote:
Mike,
Yes error 1104 would point to it being a hardware problem. The very
fact that someone has decided to replace a switch would seem to
confirm this and no amount of programming will solve the problem as
you are very well aware.
Same old story I guess..
lf Of
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
Sent: 05 July 2017 20:29
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Disappearing (and later reappearing) data on Windows Server 2016
(UPDATED WITH LATEST: ERROR 1104)
Here's an update on this issue...
So I went into the code and added a FLUSH behind the TABLEUPDAT
#x27;s replacing a Switch soon that appears to be
faulty. Sounds to me like this could definitely be a culprit.
Again to recap: they've had Windows Server 16 for awhile and no
problems until they updated the local clients to Windows 10. Also, the
local A/V software has had exclusio
On 2017-06-13 09:36, Tracy Pearson wrote:
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote on 2017-06-08:
Heard from client's Tech guy. Apparently the Server 2016 has been in
place for awhile. No problem when my app accessed from Windows 7
clients; problems only started with the introducti
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote on 2017-06-08:
> Heard from client's Tech guy. Apparently the Server 2016 has been in
> place for awhile. No problem when my app accessed from Windows 7
> clients; problems only started with the introduction of the Windows 10
> clients.
>
>
On 2017-06-09 07:47, Man-wai Chang wrote:
I remember 'opportunity locking"
https://www.google.com.hk/search?q=opportunity+locking&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=w4o6WZFXwcrSBKGakYAF
but that's on the SERVER, right? To reiterate, this Server 2016 has
been in place for a short time but th
I remember 'opportunity locking"
https://www.google.com.hk/search?q=opportunity+locking&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=w4o6WZFXwcrSBKGakYAF
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 5:18 AM, Fred Taylor wrote:
> Sounds like a caching issue.
--
.~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY!
/ v \ 64-bit Fedora 25 Ser
On 2017-06-08 13:57, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
Heard from client's Tech guy. Apparently the Server 2016 has been in
place for awhile. No problem when my app accessed from Windows 7
clients; problems only started with the introduction of the Windows 10
clients.
Also,
Fred
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 1:49 PM,
wrote:
VFP9SP2 app on Win10 clients; data on Windows Server 2016
Client showed me (via TV session) how adding records seems to show the
new
records in the local vfp view, then after saving, not showing them,
then
exiting and re-entering the app, the da
On 2017-06-06 17:18, Fred Taylor wrote:
Sounds like a caching issue.
My thoughts too; however, the write-behind caching is turned off on the
CLIENT. I *do wonder* however about the Windows Server 2016
write-behind setting. Is this related to the OpLocks setting mentioned
in past server
Sounds like a caching issue.
Fred
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 1:49 PM, wrote:
> VFP9SP2 app on Win10 clients; data on Windows Server 2016
>
> Client showed me (via TV session) how adding records seems to show the new
> records in the local vfp view, then after saving, not showin
Yes I was misinformed
Al
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Man-wai
Chang
Sent: 17 August 2016 13:12
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] windows server 2007
I was about to comment on that :)
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 9:28 PM
I was about to comment on that :)
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Alan Bourke wrote:
> There's no such thing as Windows Serevr 2007.
>
> If they mean Windows Server 2008 or 2008R2 then there is
--
.~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY!
/ v \ 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10 (Linux k
I have connected Windows 7/8/10 Desktops to Windows Server
2003/2008/2010/2012 without any issues. This has been done in early 2012.
On Tuesday 16 August 2016, Dave Crozier wrote:
> Standard works but obviously doesn't activate any group policies or file
> security/access on a folder
have
everyone with the same level of access to all data.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Allen Pollard
Sent: 16 August 2016 12:37
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: RE: [NF] windows server 2007
Thanks Alan
Yes I would not allow anything else
] windows server 2007
The 'Pro' variety of Windows 10 should be the one used for connecting to
Windows domains too.
--
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free versi
The 'Pro' variety of Windows 10 should be the one used for connecting to
Windows domains too.
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/
: 16 August 2016 11:46
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: [NF] windows server 2007
Allen,
If the client is running a domain then the machines must be members of the
domain to get full access rights to the server obviously.
If the Win 10 has been set up with a Microsoft account as login then
eafe.com
Subject: RE: [NF] windows server 2007
Ah ok so 2008 is not a problem with win 10? So it has to be setup of win 10?
I see that there is, on the accounts setup, a choice of logging in as Microsoft
account or other. I wonder if other will solve the problems. The problems being
unable to con
server.
Al
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Alan
Bourke
Sent: 16 August 2016 11:17
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] windows server 2007
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016, at 10:08 AM, Allen Pollard wrote:
> It would explain
> why
>
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016, at 10:08 AM, Allen Pollard wrote:
> It would explain
> why
> the bad take-up of windows 10 if it costs 120,000 AUD for a relatively
> small
> company.
We have plenty of companies on Server 2008 and earlier who are starting
to introduce Windows 10 clients, either by upgrade or
Sent: 16 August 2016 10:45
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] windows server 2007
>
> A client has been told windows 10 does not work with windows server 2007
> and
> that they need to pay 15,000 AUD (Australia) to upgrade.
They might be right if the client is on a volu
>
> A client has been told windows 10 does not work with windows server 2007
> and
> that they need to pay 15,000 AUD (Australia) to upgrade.
They might be right if the client is on a volume licensing program. Some
components for the activation of client PCs do not run on all version
: [NF] windows server 2007
2007? That must be one of those hooky far east copies Allen!!!
I can confirm 2003, 2008 and/or 2008R2 all connect no problem.
Never have seen the existence of 2007 server unless it is one of the Small
Business System variants (of which there were many) which had their ow
-Original Message-
There's no such thing as Windows Server 2007.
If they mean Windows Server 2008 or 2008R2 then there is nothing
stopping Windows 10 clients working with it per se. It would connect to
anything down to Server 2000 probably, if you enable SMB 1.0 and CIFS
su
nomenclature.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Allen Pollard
Sent: 15 August 2016 12:11
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: RE: [NF] windows server 2007
Yes that was my thoughts. But has anyone tried going to a 2007 server and
connecting a
There's no such thing as Windows Server 2007.
If they mean Windows Server 2008 or 2008R2 then there is nothing
stopping Windows 10 clients working with it per se. It would connect to
anything down to Server 2000 probably, if you enable SMB 1.0 and CIFS
support.
--
Alan Bourke
alanpb
.
>
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 6:50 AM, Allen Pollard
> wrote:
>> Hi gang
>> A client has been told windows 10 does not work with windows server 2007
> and
>> that they need to pay 15,000 AUD (Australia) to upgrade. I smell a money
>> maker there. I don't use a
; Hi gang
> A client has been told windows 10 does not work with windows server 2007
and
> that they need to pay 15,000 AUD (Australia) to upgrade. I smell a money
> maker there. I don't use a server any more but does anyone have a view on
> this?
> Al
>
>
_
I'd get a second opinion.
It certainly depends on what's getting quoted, but the price is very high.
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 6:50 AM, Allen Pollard wrote:
> Hi gang
> A client has been told windows 10 does not work with windows server 2007 and
> that they need to pay 15,000
Seems that windows 10 is unable to access the server or outlook. Sounds like
a setup issue
Al
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Allen
Pollard
Sent: 15 August 2016 12:50
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: [NF] windows server 2007
Hi gang
Hi gang
A client has been told windows 10 does not work with windows server 2007 and
that they need to pay 15,000 AUD (Australia) to upgrade. I smell a money
maker there. I don't use a server any more but does anyone have a view on
this?
Al
___
You can add Hyper-V role to it! I had no experience with Hyper-V though.
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Allen wrote:
> I have not, other than XP mode, had anything to do with VM's. Is it possible
> with 2012 essentials?
--
.~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY!
/ v \ 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10 (Linu
erver?
Something
> I read said that it could but that 2012 essentials is timed to a machine,
> like OEM. That's a pain if you want to update the Server hardware, but
does
> it mean Hyper V server will or will not work with it. I want to run
Windows
> server and a Linux mail server on
ardware, but does
> it mean Hyper V server will or will not work with it. I want to run Windows
> server and a Linux mail server on the same machine.
Can't you just run different VM software?
--
Paul
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Su
On 4 December 2014 at 22:11, Stephen Russell wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Paul Hill wrote:
>
>> Just wondering: Why is everyone installing Windows Server Essentials ?
>> Is there something I'm missing?
>
> It is a potential COMBO server AD and Exch
pdate the Server hardware, but does
it mean Hyper V server will or will not work with it. I want to run Windows
server and a Linux mail server on the same machine.
Al
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http://www.avas
th it. I want to run Windows
server and a Linux mail server on the same machine.
Al
-Original Message-
It is a potential COMBO server AD and Exchange, SharePoint, IIS and SQL
Server as you choose what you want to install .
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Paul Hill wrote:
> Just wondering: Why is everyone installing Windows Server Essentials ?
> Is there something I'm missing?
>
> Regular Windows Server/Win8 installs pretty quick.
>
>
It is a potential COMBO
I was wondering that. Does it do stuff that windows 8.1 does not? I think
for one thing it does not have Hyper V where 8.1 does
Al
-Original Message-
Just wondering: Why is everyone installing Windows Server Essentials ?
Is there something I'm missing?
Regular Windows Server
Just wondering: Why is everyone installing Windows Server Essentials ?
Is there something I'm missing?
Regular Windows Server/Win8 installs pretty quick.
On 4 December 2014 at 18:34, Mike Copeland wrote:
> +1
>
> Alan Bourke wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 4 Dec 2014, at 0
+1
Alan Bourke wrote:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2014, at 01:13 AM, Paul McNett wrote:
Wouldn't some sort of
text output along with a timestamp be better, so I could step away and
come back and see if the state has changed at all? Especially on a
server? Don't system admins want output?
I would definite
> You confuse a file server for 25 with a personal computer for 25 separate
> users. Sorry but apples to bananas here.
>
> Remote access is only needed for specific actions or activities such as
> installs or maintenance.
Yeah, Essentials 2012 ONLY support two RDP users, and they have to be
adm
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 6:19 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
>
>>
> Paul: I set up W 2012 Essentials and noticed the same thing. I just
> waited until it looked like things were done and all was well. System
> configured easy and works nicely. The promises of 25 remote users is a
> little deceiving
On 12/3/2014 3:30 PM, Paul McNett wrote:
Just started to configure a brand new server from Dell with Windows
Server 2012 Essentials R2. Surprised to be waiting over 15 minutes
with the Windows logo and a fancy spinning beach ball.
If it's doing something, certainly it would be telli
On Thu, 4 Dec 2014, at 01:13 AM, Paul McNett wrote:
> Wouldn't some sort of
> text output along with a timestamp be better, so I could step away and
> come back and see if the state has changed at all? Especially on a
> server? Don't system admins want output?
>
I would definitely prefer a mo
Doing the same thing here, and had patiently waited!
And I am using a 1.6GHz CPU (AMD E350)! :)
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 6:30 AM, Paul McNett wrote:
> Just started to configure a brand new server from Dell with Windows Server
> 2012 Essentials R2. Surprised to be waiting over 15 minutes wi
On 12/3/14, 2:40 PM, Alan Bourke wrote:
What's the disk light doing?
There weren't any blinking lights... After about 20 minutes I got a page
to choose the partitioning, did that, pressed ok, that window didn't
clear, but nothing was responsive. Waited 5 minutes and left it to check
again to
What's the disk light doing?
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
On Wed, 3 Dec 2014, at 10:30 PM, Paul McNett wrote:
> Just started to configure a brand new server from Dell with Windows
> Server 2012 Essentials R2. Surprised to be waiting over 15 minutes with
&g
Just started to configure a brand new server from Dell with Windows
Server 2012 Essentials R2. Surprised to be waiting over 15 minutes with
the Windows logo and a fancy spinning beach ball.
If it's doing something, certainly it would be telling me, right,
instead of just sitting there lo
data corruption on Windows Server 2012 RC
One of my customers recently purchased a new HP Reliant server with Windows
Server 2012 R2 installed. The hardware vendor installed our program and data
and it worked as before without a site visit on our part. Our VFP 9.0
program hasn't changed in m
On 07/18/2014 09:45 AM, Richard Kaye wrote:
> I think W3.11 used SMB version 0...
>
I'm thinking we might have been up to version Zero-Point-Five by then.
What really tickles my funny bone is that in Windows 7 and 8, what, the
12th version of Windows or so (2.0, 3.0, 3.11. WfWg, 95, 98, WinMe, N
I think W3.11 used SMB version 0...
--
rk
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 7:33 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: VFP9.0 data corruption on Windows Server 2012 RC
On 07/17/2014 05:51 PM
Well, whatever the fix is, one of the options detailed should do the
trick! We'll be in a world of hurt when they drop SMB1 finally maybe.
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014, at 12:32 AM, Ted Roche wrote:
> On 07/17/2014 05:51 PM, Richard Kaye wrote:
> > I
On 07/17/2014 05:51 PM, Richard Kaye wrote:
> I've been burned too many times by MS assertions that all the issues around
> shiny newer SMB protocols are now fixed.
The first time it was supposedly fixed was Windows 7 SP1.
I think you misspelled Windows 3.11 :)
--
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
ty to my application world.
--
rk
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Alan Bourke
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 5:21 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: VFP9.0 data corruption on Windows Server 2012 RC
Respectfully have to dis
On 07/17/2014 05:21 PM, Alan Bourke wrote:
> Enterprise Hotfix Rollup
This one, dated 2013, may be the thing:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2013/03/20/enterprise-hotfix-rollup-for-windows-7-sp1-and-windows-server-2008-r2-sp1-available-now.aspx
--
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
On 07/17/2014 05:21 PM, Alan Bourke wrote:
>
> Respectfully have to disagree regarding disabling SMB2/3. That was
> necessary for a period on server 2008 where there was a bug that
> corrupted indexes. It is not necessary or advisable any more. What you
> probably need on Server 2008 and any Win7
Respectfully have to disagree regarding disabling SMB2/3. That was
necessary for a period on server 2008 where there was a bug that
corrupted indexes. It is not necessary or advisable any more. What you
probably need on Server 2008 and any Win7 workstations is apply the
Enterprise Hotfix Rollup. T
On Thursday, July 17, 2014 4:46 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote:
>
>
>Ted Roche wrote on 2014-07-17:
>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Alan Lukachko <
>> a...@software-strategies-na.com> wrote:
>>
>>> and it worked as before without a site visit on our part. Our VFP 9.0
>>> program hasn't cha
off-line
file support.
--
rk
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Alan
Lukachko
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 2:34 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: VFP9.0 data corruption on Windows Server 2012 RC
One of my customers recently purc
Have seen this many times in many years, from Windows Server 2003 up what I
can remember.
2014-07-17 21:26 GMT+02:00 Allen :
> I have just had data problems and after getting the cause could be anti
> virus from members here I passed that on to the client. Turned out to be
> the
>
Ted Roche wrote on 2014-07-17:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Alan Lukachko <
> a...@software-strategies-na.com> wrote:
>
>> and it worked as before without a site visit on our part. Our VFP 9.0
>> program hasn't changed in more than 4 years. Now they get corruption of
>> indexes. A message
I have just had data problems and after getting the cause could be anti
virus from members here I passed that on to the client. Turned out to be the
wrong version of anti virus, so I was told. Whatever that means it was the
anti virus
Al
-Original Message-
Someone even mention antivirus
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Alan Lukachko <
a...@software-strategies-na.com> wrote:
> and it worked as before without a site visit on our part. Our VFP 9.0
> program hasn't changed in more than 4 years. Now they get corruption of
> indexes. A message flashes up when this happens. They have y
Hi Alan:
I've read something about this problem on various sites/forums. I've made a
quick search of "Windows Server 2012 R2 vfp data corruption" and found some
interesting info talking about opportunistic locking and smb2 (there are
some of the same topic about Server
On 17/07/2014 02:34 PM, Alan Lukachko wrote:
One of my customers recently purchased a new HP Reliant server with Windows
Server 2012 R2 installed. The hardware vendor installed our program and data
and it worked as before without a site visit on our part. Our VFP 9.0
program hasn't chang
One of my customers recently purchased a new HP Reliant server with Windows
Server 2012 R2 installed. The hardware vendor installed our program and data
and it worked as before without a site visit on our part. Our VFP 9.0
program hasn't changed in more than 4 years. Now they get corrupti
On 2014-01-17 15:58, kamcgin...@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure if this is related. We have a Win7 system with 24gb memory.
It has a 128gb SSD for the C: drive and 2 3TB hard drives mapped F:
and G:. In addition we have 6 external USB drives - 4 3TB and 2 4TB
drives (all are Seagate). This thing takes
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 4:19 AM, Joe Yoder wrote:
> If I could find a SSD in a kit with the software to optimize the OS to work
> with it and provide a way to copy the OS to itself, I would probably buy it.
BTW, I am not sure whether a Pentium 4 CPU would take full advantage
of the speed of SSD.
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 4:19 AM, Joe Yoder wrote:
> I have an Optiplex 320 box with a 3.2 gig Pentium 4 and 4 gigs of RAM. I
> recently installed a new motherboard and a pair of 1 terabyte drives using
> software RAID 0.
> The machine has developed a nasty habit of hanging on bootup after a
> Mic
1 - 100 of 212 matches
Mail list logo
