> > "Valentina does not require the creation of KEY fields - you can avoid the
> > headache of filling in unique values.
> >
> > Each Valentina Table has a special RecID field, which provides a unique
> > number for a record of this table."
> [snip]
> > Okay, yeah, but nothing is free.
> >
> Yes - Valentina uses the equivalent of RECNO(). It suffers the
> same problem (fatal, IMO) that if you export the data and then import it,
> all relations are messed up if there are any deleted records.
Yikes! He's actually relying on records never being deleted from the
tables??? Th
On Dec 15, 2011, at 3:27 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote:
>> His point was since they were offsets and not actual stored values,
>> they were more efficient. Valentina records are fixed length, so to get
>> RecID=99 the software only has to jump to the start of the file + (99 * rec
>>
On 12/15/2011 7:57 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
> His point was since they were offsets and not actual stored values,
> they were more efficient. Valentina records are fixed length, so to get
> RecID=99 the software only has to jump to the start of the file + (99 * rec
> length).
Isn't this how V
On Dec 15, 2011, at 8:20 AM, Paul Newton wrote:
> Which "better options" do you have in mind?
Depends on the use case. For relational servers, PostgreSQL is my
choice. For embedded, SQLite and Firebird are excellent. If you need both
server and embedded, Firebird looks like a winner. Fo
Ed
Which "better options" do you have in mind?
Paul Newton
-Original Message-
From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On
Behalf Of Ed Leafe
Sent: 15 December 2011 12:57
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Free Valentina Database
On Dec 14,
On Dec 14, 2011, at 8:02 PM, Ken Dibble wrote:
> "Valentina does not require the creation of KEY fields - you can avoid the
> headache of filling in unique values.
>
> Each Valentina Table has a special RecID field, which provides a unique
> number for a record of this table."
[snip]
>
>Working on the basis that anything from David Crozir Esq is worthy of a
>read, here is an article re differences between their database V
>Database the Relational Way:
>http://www.valentina-db.com/en/developer-articles/104-5-minute-technical-intro-to-valentina
From the article:
"Valentina does
I was thinking that too. Thanks Dave
Al
-Original Message-
From: Dave Crozier
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 4:46 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Free Valentina Database
This may be of use to Allen as I know he doesn't like setting up SQL servers
such as M$SQL etc be
ember 2011 15:13
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Free Valentina Database
Working on the basis that anything from David Crozir Esq is worthy of a read,
here is an article re differences between their database V Database the
Relational Way:
http://www.valentina-db.com/en/developer-articles/104-5-m
Working on the basis that anything from David Crozir Esq is worthy of a
read, here is an article re differences between their database V
Database the Relational Way:
http://www.valentina-db.com/en/developer-articles/104-5-minute-technical-intro-to-valentina
Kind regards
Andrew Stirling
01250 87
On Dec 14, 2011, at 4:42 AM, Dave Crozier wrote:
> Some of you may be interested to know that the Valentina Relational Database
> Office server is now available completely free.
>
> http://www.valentina-db.com/
>
> It is ODBC compliant so you can use it with VFP.
>
> Oh, and it's fast
>
>
Just to clarify using Web edition of RB as you can't generate stand alone
iPhone apps ...yet.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
Dave Crozier
Sent: 14 December 2011 10:42
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Free Valentina
13 matches
Mail list logo
