Re: Simple-date vs local-time

2014-01-02 Thread Attila Lendvai
> are stored as "timestamp without time zone," but we are hoping to move > toward a timezone-aware model at some point down the road (although not > immediately--it might end up being a couple years). just a quick note that local-time timestamps are also not aware of timezones either, and that is

Re: Simple-date vs local-time

2013-12-31 Thread Eli Naeher
Thank you--it's helpful to hear that. -Eli On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Marijn Haverbeke wrote: > Definitely use local-time. The integration worked well, back in 2007, > and neither library has changed very much since then, so I think you > can feel safe that they are in good shape (others

Re: Simple-date vs local-time

2013-12-30 Thread Marijn Haverbeke
Definitely use local-time. The integration worked well, back in 2007, and neither library has changed very much since then, so I think you can feel safe that they are in good shape (others are using them as well). On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Eli Naeher wrote: > Hello, > > I'm working on movi