host would NOT be a
trusted user/connection. However, if I look through my logfile, Postfix
is I.D.'ing the computer connecting to the server as "LOCAL".
Any ideas? Again, without me attaching the master.cf files, it is a shot
in the dark. But I thought someone might have an idea...
Thanks!
Rodman
while I forget how to administer the damn thing. I'm moving all my
servers to a new Linux box so I am having to remember what I did all those
years ago! :-)
Thank you so much for your help!
Rodman
---
virtual_alias_domains = domain1.com domain2.com
virtual_alias_maps = hash:
Yeah, that makes more sense, doesn't it??
:-)
Thanks!
Rodman
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Evans - Postfix List"
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 9:45 AM
Subject: Re: SASL Problem
Rodman Frowert wrote:
Anyway, would you mind just looking over the end of my m
Those darn spammers!
Thanks for your help, Noel.
Rodman
- Original Message -
From: "Noel Jones"
To: "Rodman Frowert" ;
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 9:41 AM
Subject: Re: SASL Problem
Rodman Frowert wrote:
Noel,
Your instructions worked perfectly. Now only c
nt to keep home directories clean.
Rodman
Brian,
Thank you for your reply. That is a long way to go to simply change the
location that Postfix delivers to. Is that the only way.
I should be using Virtual Users anyway, as I'm the only one who actually
needs shell access. Everyone else is just needs mail...
Rodman
- Ori
Yeah, your right about Virtual being eaiser in the long run. I was just
excited that I was almost done configuring my server and now I need to do
some more work to it!! Augh!
It will pay off in the long haul though...
Rodman
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Evans - Postfix
if another table is created to lookup
these non-system users? Do the actual system users need to be added to the new
lookup table?
Wow, hopefully that makes sense...
Rodman
le? If that is
the case, what happens to my actual system users? Do they also have to be
placed in the new local lookup table?
Just wondering, if it is a pain in the butt if I should just add them as
regular system users and be done with it...
Thanks!
Rodman
ant to get mail for j...@xyz.com but joe is not a system user (unix)
account.
So virtual domains is NOT what I need, correct? I was thinking, after
looking over the documentation that local_recipitant_maps might be more of
what I am looking for...
Rodman
- Original Message -
From: &q
anything to mail that is "mydomain" will be looked up in both tables.
Does this make sense?
Rodman
Noel wrote:
You must set them up with a username/password *somewhere* so they can check
their mail. With most IMAP/POP software, that means either creating system
users or using a &
Ahhh, now that makes more sense. I'll check it out.
Thanks Brian!
Rodman
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Evans - Postfix List"
To: "Postfix users"
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 11:06 AM
Subject: Re: mydomain & alias questions
Rodman Frowert wrote:
Mouss wrote,
> please do not hijack threads. send a new message instead of replying to
> an unrelated one.
I started this thread. Not sure what thread I purportedly hijacked you
are referring to.
> if you want virtual users, then the way to go is virtual_mailbox_domains
> (after removing $mydom
Gotcha... Wasn't thinking about threaded views. Sorry about that.
Rodman
> Rodman Frowert a écrit :
>> Mouss wrote,
>>
>>> please do not hijack threads. send a new message instead of replying to
>>> an unrelated one.
>>
>> I started t
lists and I could then
remove the block.
What would be the appropriate command to simply reject this domain?
Rodman
ives don't have search functions...
Rodman
- Original Message -
From: "Serge Fonville"
To: "postfix"
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: Blocking Hotmail
What would be the appropriate command to simply reject this domain?
I'd google for: p
16 matches
Mail list logo
