Re: postfix+dspam+content_filter

Marcin Rzepecki a écrit : > Hello, > > I have configured DSPAM to act as a deamon and bind it to Postfix via > LMTP: > # forward to dspam > smtp inet n - n - - smtpd >-o content_filter=lmtp:unix:/var/run/dspam/sock > # back route from dspam > 127.0.0.1:

Re: outbound spam filtering

David Koski a écrit : > An ISP that I do work for recently had an acocunt on their CommuniGatePro > server hijacked by a spammer. Of course this got them on the blacklist of > AOL, Yahoo and others. There are three inbound Postfix relay servers for > blacklisting that are in front of three Bar

Re: A little OT: SPF

Tolga a écrit : > Hello, > > For an e-mail not to fall into spam category, the sourcing server has to > have SPF record I think, or so I've been told. No. $ host -t txt postfix.org postfix.org has no TXT record $ host -t txt yahoo.com yahoo.com has no TXT record $ host -t txt mail.com mail.com

Re: Problem with alias Lists

Helmut Weigel a écrit : > Hi all, > > I have a wiered problem with alias lists in Postfix > > We use aliases for our internal mailing lists (departmnents for instance). > We use an OpenLDAP for the Userbase. Normally everything is ok. > > But if one recipient out of this list is over Quota Postf

Re: Postfix and DNSSEC

Bernhard Fischer a écrit : > I'd like to use DNSSEC with Postfix. > I did some research on the web but although DNSSEC is there nobody really > cares about it. > The most recent patch for Postfix is for release 2.3 and is based on libs > (libval, libsres) I didn't find any download page for. > >

Re: AW: Problem with alias Lists

Helmut Weigel a écrit : > we use lmtp with cyrus imapd > - how are the aliases implemented? are they implemented in postfix or in another program? - how are quota checks implemented? - show some logs? - ...

Re: Can content_filter take a map as an argument?

jeff_homeip a écrit : > --- In postfix-us...@yahoogroups.com, Sahil Tandon wrote: >> jweinbergerhj wrote: >> >>> I know it's a simple question...but doea any know if this: >>> >>> content_filter=hash:/path/to/table (or mysql:/path/to/filters.cf) >>> >>> will work? >> No. From postconf(5): >> >>

Re: postfig confiuration advice/info

KLaM Postmaster a écrit : > First of all let me apologize if you have seen this "request/query" > before. I originally posted this to Google Groups > "mailing.postfix.users", but felt that that it was probably the wrong > place to ask for advice. I then tried the Postfix oriented groups on my > n

Re: postfig confiuration advice/info

KLaM Postmaster a écrit : > mouss wrote: >> some uses of header and body checks: >> - reject "banned attachments" >> - detect forged Received headers >> - detect some backscatter (see the BACKSCATTER README) > I gather that all of these are well described

Re: DNSWL

Adrian Overbury a écrit : > Does anyone here make use of the DNS Whitelist? If so, what's your > experience with it? Do you find it helpful in speeding up the delivery > of legitimate mail, I use it to avoid FPs, not to speed up delivery. > or does it just increase the amount of spam you > rec

Re: Problems running multiple instances of postfix on same host

Darren Pilgrim a écrit : > Rob Tanner wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I need to run a separate instance of postfix in order to accommodate a >> FAX server. I created the directory /etc/postfix/fax and copied and >> customized the main.cf and master.cf files from the default directory >> to this new directory.

Re: Backup MX for multiple domains

DJ Lucas a écrit : > Hi guys, I believe that I already have the answer to this pretty basic > setup, but I just wanted to do a quick sanity check. > > I'm setting up a backup MX, and for one of the domains that it will > relay to, it should do no filtering whatsoever as there is a Symantec > devic

Re: postfix + procmail autoresponder

Christian Desrochers a écrit : > Hi all, > > My office will be closed for the Christmas holidays and I would like to > set up an mail autoresponder that will send back a notice to the sender > for every mail sent at @our_domain.com . > > What I really want is to reply to se

Re: postfix + procmail autoresponder

Christian Desrochers a écrit : > Allright, you guys are right. I talked with the management, and we will > use the 'vacation' program for those who really need an auto-reply, > a.k.a. people dealing with customers. Since 'vacation' only send one > email per sender, it'll do the trick. > vacation

Re: Backup MX for multiple domains

DJ Lucas a écrit : > mouss wrote: >> the question is: does the symantec device reject spam or does it "tag >> and deliver" or "quarantine". it should not reject mail since you have >> accepted it. > Honestly, I'm not even sure what device he h

Re: Additional smtpd_*_restrictions safe?

Darren Pilgrim a écrit : > King Spook wrote: >> I'm getting hit pretty hard with spam, and was hoping to reduce it a >> bit by adding the following smtpd restrictions: >> >> smtpd_helo_restrictions = reject_invalid_helo_hostname, >> reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname >> smtpd_sender_restrictions = rejec

Re: how to send mail to gmail account

Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa a écrit : > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 7:19 AM, Jorey Bump wrote: >> Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote, at 12/18/2008 06:28 AM: >> >>> I think you should send more info on your config, for example: >>> >>> MX record for your domain. >>> myhostname entry from main.cf >>

Re: how to send mail to gmail account

mouss a écrit : > Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa a écrit : >> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 7:19 AM, Jorey Bump wrote: >>> Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote, at 12/18/2008 06:28 AM: >>> >>>> I think you should send more info on your config, for examp

Re: Does a policy server exist to filter on domain age/creation?

Justin Piszcz a écrit : > $ whois linendim.com > > Record created on:2008-12-15 11:45:30.0 > Database last updated on: 2008-12-15 11:42:09.153 > Domain Expires on:2009-12-15 11:45:31.0 > > A 1-second life domain name. > > First, is there an existing policy

Re: Does a policy server exist to filter on domain age/creation?

Jorey Bump a écrit : > Justin Piszcz wrote, at 12/20/2008 05:43 AM: >> $ whois linendim.com >> >> Record created on:2008-12-15 11:45:30.0 >> Domain Expires on:2009-12-15 11:45:31.0 >> >> A 1-second life domain name. > > What do you mean? The domain expires in one ye

Re: Problems with user's mail file

Pedro Augusto a écrit : > If the problem is Mailscanner mangling the files, would an upgrade solve > the problem? > I think it's as Viktor said. I've already seen corrupted mbox files like that. consider using maildir instead. > How can I test if the problem is concurrent access? Just to be sur

Re: how hash table in transport_maps has '*' support

Reinaldo de Carvalho a écrit : > Hi, > > How hash table in transport_maps has '*' support and it in others > options (e.g. check_client_access) dont work? Postfix always query for > '*'? > > Why it is necessary if relayhost exist? > compatibility with old versions.

Re: Local delivery mail distribution

varad gupta a écrit : > Hi all > > Regrets for the previous mail. > > My Scenario -> Mail to a aingle id should be distributed to a list, BUT > one id at a time. > > e.g. if I have a mail id -> t...@company.com > > and team members are jack,phil and bill - > the first

Re: DIGEST-MD5 user/realm mismatch with Dovecot auth

Charles Marcus a écrit : > On 12/25/2008, Darren Pilgrim (post...@bitfreak.org) wrote: >> Cyrus-SASL 2.1.22 (on B and C for SMTP client SASL) > > You might try just using dovecot-sasl - one less package to > install/maintain, and it works as well or better than cyrus-sasl, and is > much easier to

Re: DIGEST-MD5 user/realm mismatch with Dovecot auth

Darren Pilgrim a écrit : > mouss wrote: >> Charles Marcus a écrit : >>> On 12/25/2008, Darren Pilgrim (post...@bitfreak.org) wrote: >>>> Cyrus-SASL 2.1.22 (on B and C for SMTP client SASL) >>> You might try just using dovecot-sasl - one less package to >

Re: howto setup outgoing port to 587 ?

Sahil Tandon a écrit : > Victor Duchovni wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 08:25:12AM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote: >> >>> sean darcy wrote: >>> Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 12:08:20PM -0500, Asif Iqbal wrote: > >> smtp_use_tls = yes >> > This is obsolet

Re: howto setup outgoing port to 587 ?

Jan P. Kessler a écrit : > mouss schrieb: >> it's not required. but if you don't verify the cert, then you trust DNS. >> so a DNS attack (poisoning, ...) would make him send passwords to the >> wrong server. >> > > > If you use encryption you

Re: howto setup outgoing port to 587 ?

Vidar Salberg Normann a écrit : >>> My ISP, ATT blocks port 25. I think if I just send the email to port 587 >>> ( which is how I've configured Thunderbird ) this should work. >> On 587, you will also need SASL authentication. This is a "submission" >> service. > > Does this mean you can't make po

enforcing sender domain in outbound mail [Was: ]

D. Karapiperis a écrit : > Hi All > > I have a question regarding postfix restrictions. > > Is there a way for Postfix to enforce some kind of policy so that all > the outgoing (allowed) mails be " @business.com" and all the others be > rejected. > Of course this policy should be enforced only to

Re: Action during SMTPD* checks

KLaM Postmaster a écrit : > I have just finished reading a bunch of stuff on UCE and the "effects" > of the various parameters associated with the smtpd_*_restrictions, and > I am now somewhat confused as two of the authors I have been reading > state that if a message receives an "OK" from any che

Re: Enforcing sending domain from the inside network

D. Karapiperis a écrit : > > > Hi All >> >> I have a question regarding postfix restrictions. >> >> Is there a way for Postfix to enforce some kind of policy so that all >> the outgoing (allowed) mails be " @business.com" and all the others be >> rejected. >> Of course this policy should be enfor

Re: VERP uses the recipient name after virtual_regexp rewriting

Jesper Dybdal a écrit : > I have just installed a mailing list manager (Mailman) for use with my > Postfix installation (which has just been upgraded to 2.5.5). I have > patched Mailman to use the XVERP option on MAIL FROM. > > This works, but I was surprised to see that when the recipient addres

Re: Trying to use uppercase names in Postfix.

Xn Nooby a écrit : > Hi Sahil, > > I am looking in to how to create the duplicate passwd file entries, I > am assuming I cannot just edit the file without corrupting it. you forgot to tell us which OS you run. let's assume your "sudo ..." as a hint ;-p - save the following as doit.sh #!/bin/s

Re: VERP uses the recipient name after virtual_regexp rewriting

Jesper Dybdal a écrit : > On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 22:30:53 +0100, mouss wrote: > >> Jesper Dybdal a écrit : >>> Since mailing list software using XVERP needs to recognize the address >>> from the envelope return path as being equal to the subscribed address, >> R

Re: Enforcing sending domain from the inside network

D. Karapiperis a écrit : > I did the from_inside_network thing to do the logical AND regarding the > sending domain. A "logical AND" can be replaced by a sequence. and a sequence is easier to manage (in the mind, on paper, ...). > Is there any way to do this woth permit_mynetworks? > to do what

Re: Enforcing sending domain from the inside network

Wietse Venema a écrit : > D. Karapiperis: >> I did the from_inside_network thing to do the logical AND regarding the >> sending domain. Is there any way to do this woth permit_mynetworks? >> >> Is there any way to permit local users (from the inside network) to send >> emails using the business d

Re: Enforcing sending domain from the inside network

D. Karapiperis a écrit : > O/H Wietse Venema έγραψε: >> Since he asked for a "nice" way to specify this in Postfix, a "nice" >> implementation of this would look like this: >> >> /etc/postfix/main.cf: >> smtpd_sender_restrictions = permit_mydomain, reject_mynetworks >> >> Where the details

Re: Alias piping + mysql in virtual domains

Joselito a écrit : > Hi, > > I'm moving an existing domain to virtual mailboxes. All the info is > stored in a mysql database. Currently all devlivery and alias mapping > is working correctly; I'm using virtual_mailbox_maps, > virtual_alias_maps and virtual_mailbox_domains stored in the sql > ba

Re: Enforcing sending domain from the inside network

D. Karapiperis a écrit : > > Open relay will not take place if the checks are included on > smtpd_sender_restrictions? an OK in smtpd_sender_restrictions does not skip smtpd_recipient_restrictions, and relay check is done in the latter (reject_unauth_destination).

Re: rewrite recipients after /etc/aliases is processed

Hanspeter Kunz a écrit : > Hi all, > > I'm trying to figure out how I can deliver mail > > usern...@examplehost.example.com > > to a central mail server (smtp.example.com) without setting > > myorigin = $mydomain > > on the example host, because I would like to see where the mail > originiated

Re: Finding the envelope-sender after always_bcc?

Jeff Weinberger a écrit : > Hi: > > After reading http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0703/1471.html and > http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0703/1519.html to help with my > autoreply capability (and making sure i get it as close to "right" as > possible!), I am trying to ensure that I can tak

Re: Rejecting emails with invalid/unlikely dates?

Darren Pilgrim a écrit : > IBBoard wrote: >> I've been looking around but so far haven't been able to find anything >> (partly because it's difficult to phrase a search query!). If someone >> has a solution/config for this then that'd be great. >> >> Before anyone points out issues with GMail and l

Re: Finding the envelope-sender after always_bcc?

Jeff Weinberger a écrit : > > I've verified that the "R" flag is there and I use -f ${sender} on the > command line (the script does parse the arguments) > > I think the envelope-sender is missing before it enters the content > filter. This from my mail.log: > > Dec 31 19:50:07 s postfix/qmgr[33

Re: Looping in new production machine!

Rich Winkel a écrit : > I'm not sure, I may have an unusual dns setup on this mail server. > The primary host name is math.missouri.edu, but it has an alias of > math.math.missouri.edu. In any case, I'm getting the dreaded: > > status=SOFTBOUNCE (mail for math.math.missouri.edu loops back to myse

Re: Finding the envelope-sender after always_bcc?

jeff_homeip a écrit : > --- In post...@yahoogroups.com, mouss wrote: >> Jeff Weinberger a écrit : >>> I've verified that the "R" flag is there and I use -f ${sender} on the >>> command line (the script does parse the arguments) >>> >>>

Re: Finding the envelope-sender after always_bcc?

Jeff Weinberger a écrit : > > Thank you! That helps clarify what I was missing in this - so clearly > dspam is not passing the envelope sender back to postfix. > > I suspect it doesn't know how via SMTP, but it can also use the > sendmail command to do this. I will experiment with this. > no,

Re: RCPT TO problem using relay host

Dennis Putnam a écrit : > I have a machine running postfix that is required to relay mail through > my ISP's mail server. When I try to send mail, I get this error: > > 550 [PERMFAIL] destination not valid within DNS (in reply to RCPT TO > command) > > Can someone explain what this error means? I

Re: Finding the envelope-sender after always_bcc?

Jeff Weinberger a écrit : > > I've been reading the dspam docs this morning and the project owner > states fairly strongly that sendmail is far preferable to SMTP > re-injection (in the postfix setup docs), but doesn't say why. if he doesn't say why, then we don't know whether there was a problem

Re: issue connecting to mysql after upgrade

r through > socket '/tmp' (38) > > As far as I can tell this has been consistent with smtpd, cleanup and > trivial-rewrite, but nothing else. (there have been pre-existing issues, > per my prior conversation with mouss, with dspam, but these have not > changed at all

Re: issue connecting to mysql after upgrade

Jeff Weinberger a écrit : >> [snip] >> >> - try with "hosts = 127.0.0.1" (without "localhost") > > Tried this - no change. :( > ahem. if you do this, you should not hear about a socket. it should use a TCP connection. can you show the errors? > [snip] >> >> why do use sender_canonical instead o

Re: Finding the envelope-sender after always_bcc? (SOLVED)

Jeff Weinberger a écrit : > > I used a pcre: table for smtpd_sender_restrictions and the PREPEND > action as follows: > > main.cf: > smtpd_sender_restrictions = check_sender_access > pcre:/etc/postfix/smtpd_sender_restrictions.pcre > > smtpd_sender_restrictions.pcre > /^(.*)/ PREPEND X

Re: reject_rbl_client after check_policy_service

Rajkumar S a écrit : > Hi, > > I have a smtpd_recipient_restrictions section as follows: > > smtpd_recipient_restrictions = > reject_unknown_sender_domain, > permit_mynetworks, > reject_non_fqdn_sender, > reject_non_fqdn_hostname, > reject_invalid_hostname,

Re: reject_rbl_client after check_policy_service

Rajkumar S a écrit : > On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 6:19 PM, mouss wrote: >> just use: >> 450 4.7.1 Greylisted Come back after 30 seconds > > Ooops I still get postfix/smtpd[27954]: warning: restriction > `450' after `defer' is ignored Remove the "de

Re: Finding the envelope-sender after always_bcc? (SOLVED)

Jeff Weinberger a écrit : > > It's definitely my set up. I don't use LMTP to pass the message to > dspam, I use a transport called "dspam" that uses pipe. That means > there's no S/LMTP dialog, just the message itself passed as STDIN. > so _you_ are not passing the envelope sender to dspam. Con

Re: Finding the envelope-sender after always_bcc? (SOLVED)

Jeff Weinberger a écrit : > On Jan 2, 2009, at 9:20 AM, mouss wrote: > >> Jeff Weinberger a écrit : >>> >>> It's definitely my set up. I don't use LMTP to pass the message to >>> dspam, I use a transport called "dspam" that uses pipe

Re: Finding the envelope-sender after always_bcc? (SOLVED)

Jeff Weinberger a écrit : >>> content_filter=lmtp:unix:/path/to/dspam args >> >> No. >> content_filter=lmtp:inet:127.0.0.1:10024 >> >> where the 10024 is the same port used in dspam.conf: >> ServerPort10024 >> >> of course, dspam must be running in daemon mode. > > dspam is runnin

Re: Finding the envelope-sender after always_bcc? (SOLVED)

Jeff Weinberger a écrit : > > OK, thanks. I will set up dspam to listen on port 10024 - seems to make > the most sense. I don't need a localhost:10024 entry in master.cf then? > right? > no, 10024 will be used by dspam. your postfix should have a 127.0.0.1:10025 to get mail back. >> >>> So is

Re: Finding the envelope-sender after always_bcc? (SOLVED)

Jeff Weinberger a écrit : > I'm guessing I should leave my port 25 (smtp) entry to allow submission > on that port with authentication (leaving > "smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated...") - is there any > harm in that? > no. but separating roles makes configuration easier. so enco

Re: syslog convert to lowercase

ram a écrit : > Can all the logs be made in lowercase only atleast the sender and the > recipient emailids > > Since we have huge logs, searching for something in the logs is quite > expensive. why not write a script to parse the logs and store them in a format that makes searching easier? > An

Re: Allowing return email

postfix@cmulcahy.com a écrit : > Greetings: > > I'm running several spam-filtering tools including Postgrey, > SpamAssassin, etc. I would like to make replying to mail I have sent > easier. > How can I automatically white-list addresses to whom I have sent email? you can write a script that

Re: running a second custom smtpd on second IP address

Drew Derbyshire a écrit : > I've got a postfix server running which accepts several domains on it's > primary smtpd (kew.com, *.wild.kew.com, thinfilmmfg.com, > *.wild.thinfilmmfg.com, ...), all protected by the usual (and some > unusual) SPAM filters. Life is good. > > I'd like to set up a secon

Re: Postix relay gateway - "Recipient address rejected" notification verbosity ...

Antony a écrit : > Happy new year to all of you ! ;o) > Bonne année! > [snip] > > smtpd_recipient_restrictions = > > reject_invalid_hostname, > > reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname, > > reject_non_fqdn_hostname, > this is the same as reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname > reject_no

Re: Allowing return email

Ralf Hildebrandt a écrit : > * postfix@cmulcahy.com : >> Greetings: >> >> I'm running several spam-filtering tools including Postgrey, >> SpamAssassin, etc. I would like to make replying to mail I have sent >> easier. >> >> How can I automatically white-list addresses to whom I have sent

Re: Header/body checks question, problem.

KLaM Postmaster a écrit : > I am having a problem with some legitimate emails being rejected by > header and/or body checks. Both the header and body checks are from > Jeffrey Posluns' write up,without any mods. > Among the stuff being rejected is the output of pflogsumm, I run a daily > a report a

Re: localhost and smarthost

Asif Iqbal a écrit : > Hi All > > All my email gets relayed thru gmail as it should. But how do I tell > it to send all localemails to local spool and not send it to gmail? > what kind of "localemails"? if these use a local domain, add the domain to mydestination. if they use an external domain,

Re: localhost and smarthost

Asif Iqbal a écrit : > On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 6:11 AM, mouss wrote: >> Asif Iqbal a écrit : >>> Hi All >>> >>> All my email gets relayed thru gmail as it should. But how do I tell >>> it to send all localemails to local spool and not send it to gmai

Re: How to relay AND store all emails on a gateway ?

Antony a écrit : > I slept some hours, my mind is relaxed and less confused than those > last days, let's go ! ;o) > > Thanks to Wietse and mouss, my gateway is now fully functional, and relays > emails to my server : >Internet --> mx1.mydomain.com[my gatew

Re: Relaying/forwarding query

Nigel Gilbert a écrit : > > > On 04/01/2009 19:33, "Sahil Tandon" wrote: > >> Nigel Gilbert wrote: >> >>> I have Postfix running on dusty.soc.surrey.ac.uk. I would like mail from >>> the internet addressed to unknown local users on this server (e.g. to >>> x...@soc.surrey.ac.uk) to be re-addre

Re: How to relay AND store all emails on a gateway ?

Antony a écrit : > Indeed it should work. But, I was not clear, my mistaken. > I do not wish to use dovecot as a mail server, but only as an alternative > LDA for Postfix (+ for SMTP SASL purposes). > Possible ? > hmmm. sorry. I'm not sure to understand... my understanding was that you wanted

per recipient transport [Was: Evaluation of maps in local or virtual address classes]

Victor Duchovni a écrit : > [snip] > Why per-recipient transport lookups? Often better to rewrite to a domain > where the entire domain is handled by lmtp(8). > is there a benefit in avoiding per recipient transports? or said otherwise: is there a way to tell postfix to only lookup domains? >>

Re: Different Postfix master.cf entry depending on outgoing domain.

Adam a écrit : > What I'd like to do : > > Append different altermime disclaimers depending on outbound domain. > > > What I have : > > I've setup a 'middle-man' box which is only going to run postfix and > altermime. It will then fwd via relayhost to my outbound servers > (also postfix). > >

Re: per recipient transport [Was: Evaluation of maps in local or virtual address classes]

Victor Duchovni a écrit : > On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 03:31:52AM +0100, mouss wrote: > >> Victor Duchovni a ?crit : >>> [snip] >>> Why per-recipient transport lookups? Often better to rewrite to a domain >>> where the entire domain is handled by lmtp(8). &g

Re: How to relay AND store all emails on a gateway ?

Antony Simonneau a écrit : > Forget dovecot. > For each incoming email, basically I want both to store it in Maildir format > and relay it via SMTP. > it's the same whether you deliver with dovecot or directly with postfix. to deliver both to a relay and to a "local" mailbox, you need to "dupli

Re: Catchall Domains

Corey Chandler a écrit : > [snip] >>> >> While I've got my postconf output up here, I'm also attempting to have >> this gateway rewrite all addresses of the form u...@server.example.com >> to u...@example.com before looking for a match in the transport / >> relay recipient table. Is there a way to

Re: escape characters when inserting into a table

Evan Platt a écrit : > Am I missing what this has to do with postfix, or is it just me? > the classical "MUA address completion" problem. he typed "post" by his MUA completed to postfix... and he didn't notice. > At 09:56 AM 1/7/2009, you wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> My apologies if I sent the wrong

Re: Blocking Spam

bijayant kumar a écrit : > My question is, spammers forges the from address and sends the spam where > from address and to address are same. Like in my case I am getting the spam > mails from bijay...@kavach.com to bijay...@kavach.com. So, I googled and > found that after reject_unauth_destinati

Re: Reject_unlisted_recipient and "wide" aliasing

Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez a écrit : > Noel Jones escribió: >> [snip] >> Use 1-1 mappings. Use a little script and a Makefile to let the >> computer build the aliased domain from the real domain list you already >> maintain. Size of the table is not an issue. >> >> Your postconf output looks OK

Re: "forcing" authenticated users to use port 587?

Jeff Weinberger a écrit : > Hi: > > Based on good practice and the help and urging of some of the gurus on this > list, I am moving my users to using the submission service (port 587) > instead of port 25 to send mail from their mail clients. > > Once most of them move, I'd like to start warning

Re: multiple e-mails on from:

Noel Jones a écrit : > Cameron Camp wrote: >> I have a Postfix setup which runs several mailman lists. I'm getting in >> the headers: >> >> From: nore...@domain.com, r...@www.domain.com > > The From: header is text added by the mail client or your list > processor. This isn't a postfix issue. >

safe wildcard aliasing with mysql [Was: Reject_unlisted_recipient and "wide" aliasing]

Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez a écrit : > [snip] > Any ideas to improve this? I think this could be solved with more mysql > magic... > let's use these "simplistic" tables (no id/keys... for simplicity): - a User table, with the following columns * user: the user-part of an email address * doma

Re: "forcing" authenticated users to use port 587?

jeff_homeip a écrit : > > Thanks for pointing it out - I've read it several times already. > > "ORIGINATING" is not mentioned at all in MILTER_README. > > And while I'm sure the postconf(5) brief explanation is meaningful to you, it > means > nothing to me. > > As I noted, I am completely un

Re: getting dns error

James D. Parra a écrit : > >> -Original Message- >> From: James D. Parra >> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 6:51 PM >> To: Postfix users (E-mail) >> Subject: getting dns error >> >> >> Hello, >> >> I am getting the following error when sending to the below >> mail server. I added the

Re: Need help with postfix migration

carconni a écrit : > HI, > > Two days ago my company mail server died. I was able to set up a > temporary server until I could get the data off the old drive. Tonite I > moved mailman and /var/spool/ over and reconstructed the mail boxes. > > Everything looked great until I tried to send mail. E

Re: Problem with http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html

Luigi Rosa a écrit : > Markus Schönhaber said the following on 10/01/09 13:35: > >> Is there something wrong with the server / anyone else seeing this? > > Confirmed here (ADSL connection in Italy with British Telecom). > > Same problem with Firefox on Linux, Firefox on Windows and MSIE7, latest

Re: Question on allowing a specific server to send mail

David Cottle a écrit : > I have hardened by main.cf file: > > smtpd_sender_restrictions = check_sender_access > hash:/var/spool/postfix/plesk/blacklists, don't put your maps inside the queue directory. There are a lot of better places. > reject_non_fqdn_sender, > reject_unauthenticated_sender_l

Re: Adding a table to proxy_read_maps...

Charles Marcus a écrit : > On 1/11/2009, Victor Duchovni (victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com) wrote: >>> First question... is there a reason that none of the *_limit_maps are >>> included in proxy_read_maps by default? I.e., maybe doing this is not >>> recommended? > >> Ask the maintainers of the u

Re: smtp_helo_name ignored

David Cottle a écrit : > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 12/01/2009, at 15:36, Sahil Tandon wrote: > >> On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, David Cottle wrote: >> >>> smtpd_banner = gateway.aus-city.com >>> >>> I want the helo to say that name. I assume I drop the hostname and what >>> about the ESMTP? >> >>

Re: bad command startup --throttling

Nathan Huesken a écrit : > Hello, > > I am trying to configure my postfix mail server using this guide: > http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/DovecotLDAPostfixAdminMySQL > > So it is a mysql, dovecot, postfix, postfixadmin setup. > > In my mail.warn, I get lots of messages like this: > postfix/master[

Re: Can't stop UNDELIVERED MAIL RETURNED TO SENDER emails

David Cottle a écrit : > Magnus Bäck wrote: >> On Monday, January 12, 2009 at 22:19 CET, >> David Cottle wrote: > >>> The messages are all faked spam supposedly sent from mail addresses >>> that are valid off the server domains. So therefore non valid >>> addresses are being rejected. So ho

Re: Having problem with SMTP AUTH

postmas...@klam.ca a écrit : > This may be a duplicate request, if so sorry but its been a bad day so > far! > I don't seem to be able to get SMTP Auth to work. I have read the Postfix how > toes, and several other peoples how toes and nothing I do seems to work. > > If I telnet into may mai

Re: Question about particular Relay configuration

Giovanni Mancuso a écrit : > Hi to all, > i have a question about a particular postfix configuration. > In my test machine, i try to create a particular enviroment. I have one > postfix istance that bind in 0.0.0.0:25 and in this postfix istance i > use a relay_domains and relay_transport to redir

Re: Question about reject_unauthenticated_sender_login_mismatch

jeff_homeip a écrit : > --- In post...@yahoogroups.com, Victor Duchovni wrote: >[snip] >>> Am I then correct in concluding that with: >>> >>> smtpd_sender_restrictions = >>> permit_sasl_authenticated, >>> reject_authenticated_sender_login_mismatch, >>> reject >> Observe that the order

Re: What do these logs mean?

Ralf Hildebrandt a écrit : > * Rupert Reid : >> My postfix log is being inundated. What does it mean and how can I block >> this ip (do I need to)? > > That is not postfix, but ipop3d > People seem to be logging in and out. Seems normal for a mailserver, > if you ask me. > too many users with

Re: backscattering

Noel Jones a écrit : > Bruno GRANDJEAN wrote: >> >> thks for replying to me so quickly, I will add a: >> reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org >> in my /etc/postfix/main.cf >> I already added : >> reject_rbl_client ips.backscatterer.org >> >> how can I reject mail from outside claiming to be from my d

Re: Can't stop UNDELIVERED MAIL RETURNED TO SENDER emails

Victor Duchovni a écrit : > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 06:13:52PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > >> David Cottle: >>> Content-Description: Undelivered Message >>> Content-Type: message/rfc822 >>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit >>> >>> Received: from server.engineering.idb (unknown [127.0.0.1]) >>>

Re: Can't stop UNDELIVERED MAIL RETURNED TO SENDER emails

David Cottle a écrit : > > I found the issue. It's backscatter mail to real recipient addresses. At > first I was getting non existent as well but stopped those. > Something (a spam filter?) after postfix returns says: "Invalid destination status" You MUST not reject mail after it was accepted

Re: backscattering

Noel Jones a écrit : > mouss wrote: >> Noel Jones a écrit : >>> smtpd_data_restrictions = >>> permit_mynetworks >>> check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/no_backscatter >>> >>> # no_backscatter >>> <> reject_rbl_client i

Re: backscattering

Bruno GRANDJEAN a écrit : > Relax Dr Wietse I am using another domain to post to your mailing list This doesn't matter. it is a general principle. it was easy to guess that orange.fr isn't your domain. > Shame on me if I give the domain I have trouble with ;-) well, there's nothing bad in showin

Re: What do these logs mean?

Ralf Hildebrandt a écrit : > * mouss : > >> too many users with 'a' as first letter, and machine is in the US while >> OP is in UK. so either OP munged things, or his server is under attack. >> >> anyway, as you said, not a postfix issue. > > One

Re: How to restrict ACCESS not RELAY to the SMTP daemon?

Thomas a écrit : > Thomas wrote: >> Hello, >> i try to figure out how to restrict ACCESS to the SMTP daemon. >> >> With that, i mean something like the tcpwrapper for SMTP/SMTPS ... > > I found that about a similar solution: > > http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2007-05/0343.html >

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >