Hello,
For our setup here we needed to selectively disable BCC mappings without
disabling the other mappings. So attached is a patch that adds this capability
to receive_override_options . It does not change any other behavior.
The patch is against v2.8.3. I hope that it will be integrated in
- Цитат от Wietse Venema (wie...@porcupine.org), на 16.06.2011 в 01:18 -
karave...@mail.bg:
Hello,
For our setup here we needed to selectively disable BCC mappings
without disabling the other mappings. So attached is a patch that
adds this capability to receive_override_options . It does
- Цитат от Wietse Venema (wie...@porcupine.org), на 16.06.2011
в 02:44 - Wietse:
Apparently you can't use receive_override_options=no_address_mappings
because you need virtual alias or canonical mapping on both sides
of the filter?
karave...@mail.bg:
We do not use it before/af
- Цитат от Victor Duchovni (victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com),
на 16.06.2011 в 05:27 -
Or this?
/etc/postfix/master.cf
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o sender_bcc_maps=maptype:mapname
As the OP observed, correctly, this won't work since bcc is don
ched backend at the same
place.
Best regards
--
Luben Karavelov
was ZFS but it means to switch also the
OS to FreeBSD or some form of Solaris. And we are not there yet.
Best regards
--
Luben Karavelov
D5 of 12 SATA disks). If the server is shut down
correctly in comes up in a second.
We know that RAID5 is not the best option for write
scalability, but the controller write cache helps a lot.
Best regards
--
Luben Karavelov
s actually
end to end benchmarking, including the IMAP server.
The last fs tests I have done were April and there is no
fundamental change in the filesystems since then. Make your
test and see yourself. The setup here was XFS so we changed
only a mount option - delaylog was not default before 2.6.39.
Ext4 is also a nice choice but we have problems with long fsck
times.
Best regards
--
Luben Karavelov
ot.
>
> Yeah, we did RAID5 for a while - but it turned out we
> were still being write limited more than disk space
> limited, so the last RAID5s are being phased out for
> more RAID1.
>
> Bron.
>
--
Luben Karavelov
--
Luben Karavelov
-- Jorge Luis Borges
>
Why use milter interface? There are other ways to extend postfix that I have
found
easier to work with in perl. To name a few:
- policy filters
- before and after queue content filters
- TCP tables
Best regards
Luben
--
Luben Karavelov
aces, but for my purposes I needed access only
to headers, so Milter or content filter was overkill and performance bottleneck
(I was writing greylisting service and bounce sign/check service). Another
consideration was that I do not know how to test milters without running
full MTA.
Best regards
--
Luben Karavelov
s written for
postfix could be found here:
https://github.com/luben/postfix-utils
--
Luben Karavelov
On 16.06.2011 16:13, Wietse Venema wrote:
karave...@mail.bg:
I thought that sender_bcc_maps/recipient_bcc_maps are options to
the cleanup process, not smtpd. Will smtpd pass this informations
somehow to the cleanup process? If it could be done in this way,
I could use it and the patch is not nee
13 matches
Mail list logo
