warning:xsasl_cyrus_server_get_mechanism_list: no applicable SASL mechanisms

2012-12-05 Thread jugree
Hello. I'm getting `warning:xsasl_cyrus_server_get_mechanism_list: no applicable SASL mechanisms' (/var/log/mail.log) and `fatal: no SASL authentication mechanisms' (/var/log/mail.err) in Debian Squeeze. Installed: postfix: 2.7.1-1+squeeze1 libsasl2-2: 2.1.23.dfsg1-7 libsasl2-modules: 2.1.23.dfs

Re: warning:xsasl_cyrus_server_get_mechanism_list: no applicable SASL mechanisms

2012-12-05 Thread jugree
> Consider reading Postfix documentation. > The error message is described there. I haven't found it. Could you paste it? > While the Postfix documentation Dr. Venema referred to has the necessary > clues, you can find Debian-specific ones in the full Debian bug record > and those clues may be mo

Re: warning:xsasl_cyrus_server_get_mechanism_list: no applicable SASL mechanisms

2012-12-05 Thread jugree
> The problem is a mis-match between smtpd_sasl_security_options > (e.g., noplaintext) and the available server mechanisms (e.g., > plaintext only). I've configured UNIX-domain socket communication, enabled SASL authentication and authorization(0), but I'm still getting `fatal: no SASL authenticat

Re: warning:xsasl_cyrus_server_get_mechanism_list: no applicable SASL mechanisms

2012-12-06 Thread jugree
> and for the above to /work/ dovecot needs to offer a non-plaintext > mechanism, such as CRAM-MD5. > I would strongly suggest removing the "noplaintext" keyword during > testing. Can it be used on a regular basis (i.e., not just for testing)? Will it be better to enable a non-plaintext mechanism

Re: warning:xsasl_cyrus_server_get_mechanism_list: no applicable SASL mechanisms

2012-12-06 Thread jugree
> I would strongly suggest removing the "noplaintext" keyword during > testing. Thank you. It worked. > There is no best, there is only what fits your needs. I expect it's > common to specify > smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous > smtpd_sasl_tls_security_options = noanonymous > and then