martin f krafft a écrit :
also sprach Sahil Tandon [2009.05.23.0037 +0200]:
Why are *_checks and *_milters not end-of-data restrictions, or
better yet, policy services?
One example: 1.2.3.4 is rejected in an access(5) table referenced
in smtpd_client_restrictions. Why wait for END-OF-DATA whe
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:39:49 +0100, mouss wrote:
> j debert a écrit :
>> it seems that roundcube is popular.
>>
>> It seems to be most popular among bots as well, according to what my
>> apache logs say. I don't have roundcube but there are frequent
>> attempts to get to php scripts down in the r
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:17:49 -0500, Charles Marcus
wrote:
> On 2010-02-01 4:05 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> My Roundcube package is currently up to date, and it is a standard
>> Debian package:
>>
>> [02:21:52][r...@greer]/$ aptitude show roundcube
>> Package: roundcube
>> New: yes
>> State: insta
1 messages rejected with banned file names.
Banned File Names:
.exe,.exe-unix,scellius_600_PLUGIN_linux-2.6.9/bin/request: 1 Times(s)
From:
209.85.220.217 1 Time(s)
ALERTE ALERTE Virii
3151 postfix/cleanup[26527]: 16AB057F74: milter-reject:
END-OF-MESSAGE from localhost.localdomain[127.0.0.1]: 5.7.1 can't identify
domain in `MAILER-DAEMON'; from=<> to= proto=SMTP
helo=
Mar 19 22:11:10 r13151 dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=,
method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, TLS
Mar 19 22:11:11 r13151 dovecot: IMAP(fakessh): Disconnected: Logged out
Original Message
Subject: Re: Consolidating Virtual Domain Delivery
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:14:43 +0200
From: fakessh
To: "Roderick A. Anderson"
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:00:08 -0700, "Roderick A. Anderson"
wrote:
> Daniel L'Hommedieu wrote:
hello all
hello list
hello much many people
hello wieste
the catch-all does not seem to work.
I, however, a proper definition of it in /etc/postfix/virtual
postconf -n
[r...@r13151 ~]# postconf -n
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
body_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/body_checks.cf
bounce_notice_recip
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:02:01 -0500, Noel Jones
wrote:
> On 4/13/2010 3:34 PM, fakessh wrote:
>> hello all
>> hello list
>> hello much many people
>> hello wieste
>>
>> the catch-all does not seem to work.
>
> Doesn't work in what way? Show log
ectly with that error
> fakessh wrote:
>> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:02:01 -0500, Noel Jones
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/13/2010 3:34 PM, fakessh wrote:
>>>
>>>> hello all
>>>> hello list
>>>> hello much many people
>&g
fakessh a écrit :
> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:38:28 -0300, Egberto Monteiro
> wrote:
>> Apr 13 23:31:35 r13151 postfix/trivial-rewrite[5504]: warning: do not
> list
>> domain fakessh.eu in *BOTH *mydestination and virtual_alias_domains
>>
>>
>>
>
> this
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:07:51 +, d.h...@yournetplus.com wrote:
> Quoting fakessh :
>
>> fakessh a écrit :
>>> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:38:28 -0300, Egberto Monteiro
>>> wrote:
>>>> Apr 13 23:31:35 r13151 postfix/trivial-rewrite[5504]: warning: do no
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:12:25 -0400, Charles Marcus
wrote:
> On 2010-04-14 1:47 PM, fakessh wrote:
>> correct to this error
>> my log
>
> Please do NOT send verbose logs unless requested to do so...
>
> Disable verbose logging, and then provide a complete log transa
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:50:34 -0500, Noel Jones
wrote:
> On 4/14/2010 1:45 PM, fakessh wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:12:25 -0400, Charles Marcus
>> wrote:
I changed the entries @fakessh to r...@localhost in /etc/postfix/virtual
postmap then a file to
the postfix restart
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:33:43 -0500, Noel Jones
wrote:
> On 4/14/2010 3:42 PM, fakessh wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:50:34 -0500, Noel Jones
>> wrote:
>>> On 4/14/2010 1:45 PM, fakessh wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:12:25 -0400, Charles Marcus
>>&
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:26:25 +0200, fakessh wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:33:43 -0500, Noel Jones
> wrote:
>> On 4/14/2010 3:42 PM, fakessh wrote:
>>> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:50:34 -0500, Noel Jones
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 4/14/2010 1:45 PM, fakessh wrote
;
how to build a catch-all with dovecot lda
the question then. is not a postfix issue
> On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 01:00 +0200, fakessh wrote:
>
>> its tha archive to the cross post to postfix-users
>> help me
>>
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/postfix-users@postfix.org
gt; dovecot deliver assumes the MTA has verified the user to accept mail
> from and does not do further authentication
>
>
how to build a catch-all with dovecot lda
the question then. is not a postfix issue
> On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 01:00 +0200, fakessh wrote:
>
>> its tha archive to
12:39:24 +1000
From: Noel Butler
To: Dovecot Mailing List
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 03:50 +0200, fakessh wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 01:53:32 +0200, Pascal Volk
> wrote:
> > On 04/16/2010 01:18 AM fakessh wrote:
> >> how to build a catch-all with dovecot lda
> >> the q
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 14:26:22 +0200, mouss wrote:
> fakessh a écrit :
>> On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:33:43 -0500, Noel Jones
>> wrote:
>>> On 4/14/2010 3:42 PM, fakessh wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:50:34 -0500, Noel
Jones
>>>> wrote:
>>>
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:16:04 +0200, mouss wrote:
> fakessh a écrit :
>> On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 14:26:22 +0200, mouss wrote:
>>> fakessh a écrit :
>>>> On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:33:43 -0500, Noel Jones
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On 4/14/2010 3:42 PM,
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:29:04 +0200, fakessh wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:16:04 +0200, mouss wrote:
>> fakessh a écrit :
>>> On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 14:26:22 +0200, mouss
wrote:
>>>> fakessh a écrit :
>>>>> On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:33:43 -0500, Noel Jone
hello postfix network
are you there a official version of centos postfix most days can be redhat
this actual version is
[r...@r13151 ~]# rpm -qa | grep postfix
postfix-pflogsumm-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2
postfix-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2
This version is outdated and is no longer supported
how to keep the upstream of
On Fri, 21 May 2010 21:06:37 -0700, Gary Smith
wrote:
>> hello postfix network
>>
>> are you there a official version of centos postfix most days can be
>> redhat
>> this actual version is
>> [r...@r13151 ~]# rpm -qa | grep postfix
>> postfix-pflogsumm-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2
>> postfix-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2
>
hello all reader
hello list
hello postfix network
since I've installed dovecot deliver. e-mails no longer pass through
amavisd.
amavisd no longer work.
c is to say I have no anti-spam and anti virus
my postconf and dovecot -n
[r...@r13151 ~]# postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases , has
hello all
hello postfix network
hello centos network
I am having problems with my dk and dkim signature of my emails
I have successfully made the process of verification of signatures dnssec
all my domains are correct and good displays on dlv.isc.org
the reason for my problem just the reason t
postini give access
telnet postini 25
mail from:
rcpt to:
data
some date
.
emails is correctly delivred
its synonymy to open relay
hello
wieste is a women . when do you
its my real @
i respond a you post
duplicate in french please
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 00:41:21 +0200, fakessh wrote:
> hello
>
> wieste is a women . when do you
>
>
> its my real @
> i respond a you post
> duplicate in french please
http://www.google.fr/search?q=wieste+is+a+woman&hl=fr&client=safari&rls=en&ei=Z44
hello ladies and gents
I do not know if I am in error or in the real
i a file check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/acces_client
cat /etc/postfix/acces_client
mx3.mail2000.com.tw REJECT
mx2.mail2000.com.tw REJECT
mx2.mail.tw.yahoo.com REJECT
I forbid the property to
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:09:35 +0200, fakessh wrote:
> hello ladies and gents
>
>
> I do not know if I am in error or in the real
> i a file check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/acces_client
>
> cat /etc/postfix/acces_client
> mx3.mail2000.com.tw REJE
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:03:18 +0200, fakessh wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:09:35 +0200, fakessh wrote:
>> hello ladies and gents
>>
>>
>> I do not know if I am in error or in the real
>> i a file check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/acces_client
>>
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 23:39:18 +0200, mouss wrote:
> Jorge Andrea G Carminati a écrit :
>> Hi all! I'm trying to implement sid-milter with Postfix 2.7, but am
>> having some problems while trying to compile release 1.0 under RHEL 5.5
>> (x86_64) as shown below, any ideas?
>
> you need to cotact th
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:22:59 -0400, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:58:37AM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
>
>> I think the problem is better solved in the delivery agent.
>>
>> If you're using the postfix LMTP client, this might work:
>> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#lmtp_
hi all
hi folks
hi wieste : the saincristain of postfix
hi all the postfix network
I consult regularly logs postfix
I consult regularly logs postfix, and he appears regularly attempts to
connect mx3.mail2000.com.tw
and that is that I do not understand how it happens
I have the following rules i
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:42:26 -0500, Noel Jones
wrote:
On 8/31/2010 7:19 PM, fakessh wrote:
hi all
hi folks
hi wieste : the saincristain of postfix
hi all the postfix network
I consult regularly logs postfix
I consult regularly logs postfix, and he appears regularly
attempts to connect mx3
hi guru of postfix
hi mouss and wieste
hi all the users of ths list
my question is simply
is there a way to force startssl on port 25
or it is not a good method
many returns are welcome
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:17:56 -0400, Matt Hayes
wrote:
> On 9/14/2010 1:11 PM, fakessh wrote:
>> hi guru of postfix
>> hi mouss and wieste
>>
>> hi all the users of ths list
>>
>> my question is simply
>>
>> is there a way to force startssl
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:53:03 +0200, mouss wrote:
> Le 14/09/2010 19:11, fakessh a écrit :
>> hi guru of postfix
>> hi mouss and wieste
>>
>> hi all the users of ths list
>>
>> my question is simply
>>
>> is there a way to force startssl on p
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:56:35 -0500, Noel Jones
wrote:
> On 9/20/2010 3:29 PM, bper wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have set up a postfix-dovecot server with smtp-auth using sasl by
>> following this link:
>> https://help.ubuntu.com/10.04/serverguide/C/postfix.html
>>
>> It seems to be working OK. The
Le dimanche 26 septembre 2010 22:38, mouss a écrit :
> Le 26/09/2010 12:08, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
> > Michal Bruncko put forth on 9/26/2010 4:24 AM:
> >> It is possible in some way to configure postfix, that SPF Passed mails
> >> will be automatically accepted with postfix without greylisting?
Le dimanche 26 septembre 2010 23:46, mouss a écrit :
> Le 26/09/2010 23:28, fakessh a écrit :
> > Le dimanche 26 septembre 2010 22:38, mouss a écrit :
> >>Le 26/09/2010 12:08, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
> >>> Michal Bruncko put forth on 9/26/2010 4:24 AM:
> &
hello postfix network
hello wieste
hello mouss
hello all the reader of this list
I wish to migrate postfix-2.5.4-1 to the latest version of postfix from rpm
Official
I desire to know the good manners to do
I walk the couple clamd spamassassin postfix postgrey dovecot policyd
sid-milter dkimprox
i hijacked the server with the null sender
and the valid recipient
the mail go home
nb : hey madduck
Le lundi 04 octobre 2010 à 20:44 +0200, martin f krafft a écrit :
> also sprach Charles Marcus [2010.10.04.2029
> +0200]:
> > > Yes, with my IP.
> >
> > So your server is hacked?
>
> I am tal
you must create them by hand or you have to use plugins dovecot and
sieve
Le vendredi 08 octobre 2010 à 19:11 -0300, Márcio Luciano Donada a
écrit :
> I am configuring a server to read a basic ldap, everything is working
> wonders, but to deliver the e-mail, postfix is not creating the maildir
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 11.11.2010 22:10, Voytek Eymont a écrit :
>
> On Fri, November 12, 2010 6:16 am, Carlos Mennens wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Victor Duchovni
>> wrote:
>
>> This would be no problem except I've never attempted this before and
>> just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 01.12.2010 21:49, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
> Bruno Costacurta put forth on 12/1/2010 2:19 PM:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I intend to upgrade Postfix version 2.5.5 to 2.7.1.
>> Are there incompatibilities or specific path for upgrade ?
>> Or any manual re-config
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 15.12.2010 19:22, Eero Volotinen a écrit :
> 2010/12/15 M. Rodrigo Monteiro :
>> Hi!
>>
>> I'm tryind to compile Postfix with Dovecot support.
>
> Why? Can't you just take precompiled binary?
>
> --
> Eero
i try with succes compiled postfix with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 21.12.2010 10:01, Wolfgang Zeikat a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> apparently, aol.com is currently not resolved via DNS (at least in
> Germany).
>
> How can I have postfix queue mails to AOL and retry delivery in that
> case instead of bouncing the mails?
>
Hello postfix network.
I encounter problems in configuring ipv6.
I documented on the page but I don
http://www.postfix.org/IPV6_README.html happens not connect in ipv6 on
my mail server.
My ISP does not support ipv6 I found the error in the ipv6 by visiting
http://dnscheck.iis.se/ he tells me a
:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> What is the error that you received? If your ISP does not support IPv6
> you will not be able to use IPv6 connectivity unless you have a PoP
> tunnel or some other type of IPv4-to-IPv6 tunnel going on.
>
> On 1/20/11
use IPv6 for services
>
> Am 21.01.2011 02:33, schrieb fakessh @:
> > Hello postfix network.
> >
> > I found the error in the ipv6 by visiting http://dnscheck.iis.se/
> > he tells me a difficulty connecting ipv6 address postmas...@fakessh.eu
> >
> > check m
postfix network hello, hello Wieste.
I think I have successfully configure ipv6 on my server anyway
dig answer seems good.
~]$ dig fakessh.eu @8.8.8.8 +short
2001:41d0:2:3dd6:1234:5678:9abc:def0
and yet sometimes I don not connect to my postfix ipv6 source
I have read the manual and I
the quantity of deferred is yahoo response : this as that that is this
Le vendredi 25 février 2011 à 15:29 -0800, Robert Goodyear a écrit :
> On Feb 25, 2011, at 2:58 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 02:38:16PM -0800, Robert Goodyear wrote:
> >
> >>> Have you seen problem
> (MySQL+Postfix+Courier(+Amavisd-new)) and we are quite happy with it.
> Check it at http://www.ispconfig.org
its lol ? ... trool
On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:29:08 +0200, Ignacio Garcia wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
-Continued use of Courier-IMAP. Not so muc
work fine on my box CentOS 5.3
http://pastebin.ca/1501508
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:04:41 -0400, Charles Marcus
wrote:
> On 7/20/2009, LuKreme (krem...@kreme.com) wrote:
>> Before I bought my iTouch last year I thought I was going to hate the
>> touch-screen keyboard, but the auto correction and th
uses dkimproxy 1.1
work fine in my box
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:35:12 -0500, Noel Jones
wrote:
> Zakir Shaikh wrote:
>> Now, my problem is that when I send mails using webmail from the local
>> user configured through vPostmaster then the mails are getting signed
>> BUT the issue is that when the
i use dkimproxy 1.1 , I dont use the beta release on my box
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:36:28 +0530 (IST), Zakir Shaikh
wrote:
> Thanks fakessh,
>
> Dkimproxy did the Magic!
> works gr8.. for both - Domain Keys & DKIM.
>
>
> Thanks &am
may be used in
http://milter-manager.sourceforge.net/
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:59:47 +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter
wrote:
> Did anybody ever measure how many clients a Postfix server using Milter
can
> serve?
>
> Somewhere hidden in my brain I recall someone on the list reporting
> problems
> with Mi
I just changed the password. sorry i'am r13151.ovh.net
On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 18:06:42 +0200 (CEST), mailer-dae...@r13151.ovh.net
(Mail Delivery System) wrote:
> Transcript of session follows.
>
> Out: 220 r13151.ovh.net ESMTP Postfix (2.5.1)
> In: HELO 6.mail-out.ovh.net
> Out: 250 r13151.ovh.n
I just changed the password. sorry I'm r13151.ovh.net
On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 18:16:52 +0200 (CEST), mailer-dae...@r13151.ovh.net
(Mail Delivery System) wrote:
> Transcript of session follows.
>
> Out: 220 r13151.ovh.net ESMTP Postfix (2.5.1)
> In: HELO 6.mail-out.ovh.net
> Out: 250 r13151.ovh.ne
hi all
hi list
how well set + anvil
I would like to fine tune + anvil
I wish there was not time to expectations identified in the original
configuration of postfix.
I would minimize the role of + anvil
I often trade very fast mail that are slowed down by anvil
thanks for all your
nb : "Buddha
Hi URGENT
my problem is solved I'm not sending bounce
double_bounce_sender=no
bounce_notice_recipient = postmaster
sorry
hi all
hi postfix list
I worked all day to develop my certificates
with certificates free of startssl
I based this document
http://translate.google.fr/translate?js=y&prev=_t&hl=fr&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.grandville.net%2FOpenSSL%2FLigneDeCommande&sl=fr&tl=en
I realized correctly signed cert
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 03:00:46 +0100, fakessh wrote:
> hi all
>
> hi postfix list
>
> I worked all day to develop my certificates
> with certificates free of startssl
>
> I based this document
>
http://translate.google.fr/translate?js=y&prev=_t&hl=fr&ie=
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 03:06:41 +0100, fakessh wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 03:00:46 +0100, fakessh wrote:
>> hi all
>>
>> hi postfix list
>>
>> I worked all day to develop my certificates
>> with certificates free of startssl
>>
I properly s
hello all
hello list
I think there is a problem in the basic configuration of Postfix
the basic configuration of Postfix is included in the rpm and sources
I accessed the standard configuration file
# Alternatively, you can specify the mynetworks list by hand, in
# which case Postfix ignores the
it is necessary to consider the option
parent_domain_matches_subdomains =
Le mardi 08 mars 2011 à 00:45 +0100, mouss a écrit :
> Le 07/03/2011 15:13, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
> > Noel Jones put forth on 3/7/2011 7:00 AM:
> >> On 3/7/2011 4:47 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I was taught to al
when is it the official rpm.
Simon Mudd
the new rpms are still not present
Le lundi 07 mars 2011 à 15:18 -0500, Wietse Venema a écrit :
> [An on-line version of this announcement will be available at
> http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.7.3.html]
>
> Postfix legacy releases 2.7.3,
hello postfix guru
hello wieste
hello mouss
I would like to add anti-abuse headers. I just spent a good little time to
watch list archives and found no answers
example of a header that I want to appear in my mail
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any
Le lundi 18 avril 2011 03:27, Noel Jones a écrit :
> On 4/17/2011 6:28 PM, fakessh wrote:
> > hello postfix guru
> > hello wieste
> > hello mouss
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I would like to add anti-abuse headers. I just spent a good little t
Le lundi 18 avril 2011 13:10, Morten P.D. Stevens a écrit :
> 2011/4/18 fakessh :
> > I would like to add anti-abuse headers. I just spent a good little time
> > to watch list archives and found no answers
> >
> > example of a header that I want to appear in my mai
Le lundi 18 avril 2011 14:16, Noel Jones a écrit :
> On 4/18/2011 6:46 AM, fakessh wrote:
> > Le lundi 18 avril 2011 13:10, Morten P.D. Stevens a écrit :
> >> 2011/4/18 fakessh:
> >>> I would like to add anti-abuse headers. I just spent a good little time
> >&g
Le mardi 19 avril 2011 01:22, fakessh a écrit :
> Le lundi 18 avril 2011 14:16, Noel Jones a écrit :
> > On 4/18/2011 6:46 AM, fakessh wrote:
> > > Le lundi 18 avril 2011 13:10, Morten P.D. Stevens a écrit :
> > >> 2011/4/18 fakessh:
> > >>> I would l
hello postfix guru
hello Wieste and other develloper
I already post a question asking for more.
how to allow both HELO and EHLO. I currently only accept EHLO and I see that I
refuse a lot of legitimate mail
my postconf -n
r13151 ~]# postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases , hash:/etc
I just changed this option
smtp_tls_note_starttls_offer = may
that it's OK or not OK
thanks
Le dimanche 24 avril 2011 22:10, fakessh a écrit :
> hello postfix guru
> hello Wieste and other develloper
>
>
> I already post a question asking for more.
>
> how to a
Le dimanche 24 avril 2011 22:37, fakessh a écrit :
> I just changed this option
>
> smtp_tls_note_starttls_offer = may
>
> that it's OK or not OK
>
> thanks
i just reread the doc and
I think he must use
smtpd_tls_security_level = may
it's OK wieste ?
thanks
using so complex EHLO-restrictions?
> the following should be enough!
>
> smtpd_helo_required = yes
> smtpd_helo_restrictions = permit_mynetworks
> reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname
> reject_invalid_helo_hostname
> reject_unknown_helo_hostname
>
> Am 24.04.2011 22:37
Le dimanche 24 avril 2011 22:53, Reindl Harald a écrit :
> smtpd_helo_required = yes
I follow the advice given to me I just added this option
smtpd_helo_required = yes
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x092164A7
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 092164A7
pgpOhsGX6
Le mardi 26 avril 2011 11:28, Peter L. Hansen a écrit :
> Hi List,
>
> Iam having trouble trying to adding autoreply/autoresponder/outofoffice
> functionality to our setup.
>
me i use sieve
> Can i configure postfix to send the proper headers?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Peter Hansen
--
http://pgp.mit.edu
hi wieste
hi mouss
hi all the guru of postfix
since I said I have mimedefang headers X-SenderID are no longer present
you have an explanation
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x092164A7
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 092164A7
pgp07QNePMLiK.pgp
Description: PGP si
Le samedi 30 avril 2011 15:41, Patrick Ben Koetter a écrit :
> * fakessh :
> > hi wieste
>
> If you use vim, please put this line in your ~/.vimrc:
>
> ab wieste Wietse
>
> p@rick
hello I had my way the programmer exception
hello Wieste
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:113
Le samedi 30 avril 2011 16:02, Reindl Harald a écrit :
> Am 30.04.2011 15:57, schrieb fakessh:
> > Le samedi 30 avril 2011 15:41, Patrick Ben Koetter a écrit :
> >> * fakessh :
> jesus christ "Wietse"
> not wieste nor Wieste :-)
hello
Wietse Venema
and my
hello list
hello gurus
hello Wietse Venema
I would like to write a milter to postfix to achieve a geolocation addresses
and headers X-Anti-Abuse
you tell me with mimedefang is very simple
I have tried with success
but when I've put my achievements in production
the headers X-SenderID disap
Le lundi 2 mai 2011 17:22, Wietse Venema a écrit :
> fakessh:
> > hello list
> > hello gurus
> > hello ? Wietse Venema
> a) Free crystal balls.
yes I possess crystal balls some nice numbers thank you
>
> b) Free telepathic services.
yes I possess powers para
Le mardi 10 mai 2011 15:25, Sharma, Ashish a écrit :
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of fake...@fakessh.eu
> Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2011 9:11 PM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Sender-ID va
On Tue, 10 May 2011 17:38:29 +0200, fakessh wrote:
Le mardi 10 mai 2011 15:25, Sharma, Ashish a écrit :
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of
fake...@fakessh.eu
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2011 9:11 PM
To
stall the package system-config\*
and run
system-switch-mail-nox
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x092164A7
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 092164A7
http://urlshort.eu fakessh @
pgpf1R4y9nfK0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
postfix release
with other tools
sincerely your
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x092164A7
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 092164A7
http://urlshort.eu fakessh @
http://gplus.to/sshfake
http://gplus.to/sshswilting
http://gplus.to/john.swilting
pgpCgw5pK
Le jeudi 22 décembre 2011 22:19, Andreas Berton a écrit :
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, fakessh @ wrote:
> > hello list
> > hello geek
> > hello guru
> > hello Fu
> >
> > I have done tests on my smtp server used to dspam.
> > after problems of housing r
Le dimanche 25 décembre 2011 06:06, fakessh @ a écrit :
> Le jeudi 22 décembre 2011 22:19, Andreas Berton a écrit :
> > On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, fakessh @ wrote:
> > > hello list
> > > hello geek
> > > hello guru
> > > hello Fu
> > Hi
> > P
90 matches
Mail list logo
