Re: Fighting Backscatter

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 18.10.2010 20:06, Wietse Venema a écrit : >> 1) SpamCo forges a message from innoc...@victim.com and sends it to >> mya...@familyname.com >> >> 2) My server (familyname.com) accepts the message because >> mya...@familyname is a valid recipient that

Re: Upgrade 2.5.4

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 19.10.2010 19:42, Victor Duchovni a écrit : > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:17:23PM -0400, Linux Addict wrote: > >> Hello, I am running postfix 2.5.4 and would like to upgrade it to latest >> stable 2.7.0. What is the best way upgrade? Do a clean inst

Re: upgrade 2.5.4 to 2.6.5-1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 20.10.2010 03:15, fake...@fakessh.eu a écrit : > hello postfix network > hello wieste > hello guru of postfix > > I did not follow the ads but the version 2.6.5 causes changes in mail.cf > and master.cf you can enlighten me on my

Re: upgrade 2.5.4 to 2.6.5-1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 20.10.2010 10:39, fake...@fakessh.eu a écrit : > Le 20.10.2010 03:15, fake...@fakessh.eu a écrit : >> hello postfix network >> hello wieste >> hello guru of postfix > >> I did not follow the ads but the version 2

Re: upgrade 2.5.4 to 2.6.5-1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 20.10.2010 14:54, Brian Evans - Postfix List a écrit : > On 10/19/2010 9:15 PM, fake...@fakessh.eu wrote: >> hello postfix network >> hello wieste >> hello guru of postfix >> I solved my problem of milter what are th

Re: Sender-ID validation via Blackberry failing

On Tuesday 25 January 2011 14:23, Sharma, Ashish wrote: > Hi, > > I have a Postfix mail receiving server, on this I am using sid-milter > (found at http://sourceforge.net/projects/sid-milter/ got from > http://www.postfix.org/addon.html) tool to validate senderID and SPF. > > Here the problem is fo

Re: /var/mail

Le samedi 20 juin 2009 01:08, mouss a écrit : > Carlos Williams a écrit : > > I notice that when I create a user in my Postfix server, I also create > > a file located in /var/spool/mail: > > > > > > > > [r...@mail mail]# ls -l >

Re: Regular expression with fighting against spam

Le samedi 20 juin 2009 01:25, mouss a écrit : > Jaroslaw Grzabel a écrit : > > Jorey Bump wrote: > >> To be fair, your original question reveals that you are somewhat > >> unfamiliar with basic concepts of email administration, and that is why > >> noone is eager to help you shoot yourself in the f

sid-milter with postfix

Hi all, documentation postfix understand a line on sid-milter. can we find other documentation on sid-milter with postfix there may be another way to implement SenderID on postfix that the electronic process. a milter thanks peace for all "Buddha" Keep onlive

Re: sid-milter with postfix

I will try to install it correctly ...; you know a webpage "a sort of how-to" describing the installation, documentation clearer than the one ligne on the website postfix Le samedi 20 juin 2009 17:15, Noel Jones a écrit : > fake...@fakessh.eu wrote: > > Hi all, > >

Re: sid-milter with postfix

Hi list sid-milter 1.0.0 work so fine on my box thanks for all your feedbacks > fake...@fakessh.eu wrote: > > I will try to install it correctly ...; > > > > you know a webpage "a sort of how-to" describing the installation, > > documentation clearer than

multiple signatures DK multiple selector

hi list hi all dkimproxy I can not specify that only selector. how to have multiple signatures DK multiple number selectors thanks for all your feedbacks

Re: multiple signatures DK multiple selector

dkim I know it supports multiple signatures but DK domains and selector keys ? Le mercredi 24 juin 2009 22:28, Noel Jones a écrit : > fake...@fakessh.eu wrote: > > hi list > > hi all > > > > dkimproxy I can not specify that only selector. > > how to have mu

Re: multiple signatures DK multiple selector

use dkimproxy 1.1.0 Le mercredi 24 juin 2009 22:34, fake...@fakessh.eu a écrit : > dkim I know it supports multiple signatures > but DK domains and selector keys ? > > Le mercredi 24 juin 2009 22:28, Noel Jones a écrit : > > fake...@fakessh.eu wrote: > >

virtual table user bounced

/smtpd[19719]: 1927F24680: client=ABayonne-257-1-2-88.w90-55.abo.wanadoo.fr[90.55.121.88], sasl_method=PLAIN, sasl_username=fake...@r13151.ovh.net Jun 28 07:18:45 r13151 postfix/cleanup[19756]: 1927F24680: message-id=<200906280718.42880.fake...@fakessh.eu> Jun 28 07:18:45 r13151

Re: virtual table user bounced

its work fine thanks peace for all Le dimanche 28 juin 2009 10:36, Sahil Tandon a écrit : > On Sun, 28 Jun 2009, fake...@fakessh.eu wrote: > > I have a weird problem > > > > I issued my logs > > > > [r...@r13151 ~]# tail -f /var/log/maillog > > Ju

dk dkim with dkimproxy

renelacroute.fr how to have two accounts at the same time walk Received: from r13151.ovh.net (91.121.205.40) by verifier.port25.com (PowerMTA(TM) v3.6a1) id h8uri60hse83 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2009 14:32:01 -0400 (envelope-from ) Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com smtp.mail=fake...@fakessh.eu

Re: dk dkim with dkimproxy

OVbix/TBSfrY300mjguwkDy3lJ88VR6VTGtTrtG4JND6YgA7ncvRbgDWfN5kepMRwyfWwYOh6u3M/X8AgMGIst85CLuG5NjXkJ+cmnzVTDUcGFEq3nw8WLM689opyKB2S4vALldhWr6QIDAQAB" [swilt...@your-ab6cd29f8e ~]$ Le lundi 29 juin 2009 03:09, vous avez écrit : > "fake...@fakessh.eu" writes: > [...] > > > fakessh.eu > > dkim(c=simple,s=fakessh.eu

Re: dk dkim with dkimproxy

quot; [swilt...@your-ab6cd29f8e ~]$ Le lundi 29 juin 2009 03:31, Byung-Hee HWANG a écrit : > "fake...@fakessh.eu" writes: > > I have a strange error that I do not understand > > I have the impression of having set dkimproxy well > > my config > > [...] > > > f

Re: dk dkim with dkimproxy

I put selector , mail . it was not until the spread of dns Le lundi 29 juin 2009 05:12, Byung-Hee HWANG a écrit : > "fake...@fakessh.eu" writes: > > that right now > > [swilt...@your-ab6cd29f8e ~]$ host -t txt > > fakessh.eu._domainkey.fakessh.eu. f

Re: dk dkim with dkimproxy

i dkimproxy update to the latest version which is in beta my secondary dns is not to me he plays tricks Le lundi 29 juin 2009 05:12, Byung-Hee HWANG a écrit : > "fake...@fakessh.eu" writes: > > that right now > > [swilt...@your-ab6cd29f8e ~]$ host -t txt > > f

Re: dk dkim with dkimproxy

dTCNF/EVZi3x51FKg8wjGFWNbPW3eFaVt8ZjX0wBPFviKFeVDd2VCDwgKgk9xw0AW31kok8OX2Inikid+lPiEffoqZ2j2QOgnUJ7WnFfbKbNsm+MPLQIDAQAB" [swilt...@localhost ~]$ the 2 areas are located on the same machine one telnet fakessh.eu 2525 its ok its not NXDOMAIN Le lundi 29 juin 2009 21:52, fake...@fakessh.eu a é

Re: dk dkim with dkimproxy

problem solved. I had forgotten it. at the end of the statement Le lundi 29 juin 2009 22:27, fake...@fakessh.eu a écrit : > I get a weird error > > [swilt...@localhost ~]$ host -t txt mail._domainkey.fakessh.eu. > bitsy.mit.edu. > Using domain server: > Name: bitsy.mit.edu. &g

Re: help with dkimproxy

Le jeudi 2 juillet 2009 16:23, fake...@fakessh.eu a écrit : i have posted on dkimproxy-uses list > I have two domain names sign with dkimproxy > fakessh.eu and renelacroute.fr > I use the latest version available on sourceforge > in centos 5.3 > its the same bad error for the 2 ar

Re: help with dkimproxy

my key is good use now http://rpms.netmindz.net/el5/SRPMS.netmindz/repoview/dkimproxy.html result idem not good Le jeudi 2 juillet 2009 17:21, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz a écrit : > Le jeudi 2 juillet 2009 09:31:29, fake...@fakessh.eu a écrit : > > Le jeudi 2 juillet 2009 16:23, fake...@f

Re: help with dkimproxy

Le jeudi 2 juillet 2009 20:07, fake...@fakessh.eu a écrit : > my key is good > > use now > http://rpms.netmindz.net/el5/SRPMS.netmindz/repoview/dkimproxy.html > > result idem not good > > Le jeudi 2 juillet 2009 17:21, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz a écrit : > > Le jeudi

Re: help with dkimproxy

this is not a problem of software nb : sorry for the stupid top-post, its error Le jeudi 2 juillet 2009 20:12, fake...@fakessh.eu a écrit : > Le jeudi 2 juillet 2009 20:07, fake...@fakessh.eu a écrit : > > my key is good > > > > use now > > http://rpms.netmindz.net/

Re: help with dkimproxy

this is not a problem of software Le jeudi 2 juillet 2009 20:07, fake...@fakessh.eu a écrit : > my key is good > > use now > http://rpms.netmindz.net/el5/SRPMS.netmindz/repoview/dkimproxy.html > > result idem not good > > Le jeudi 2 juillet 2009 17:21, Luis Daniel Lucio

Re: help with dkimproxy

T1yoj1xX9L7MvtU/T22lierjqjT7guitN4/eAvmLad1qay/4JypZIS+NfHr5/Z2NK0zfAypIZ+zDNcYgUGd2wIDAQAB" [swilt...@your-ab6cd29f8e ~]$ Le samedi 4 juillet 2009 06:35, vous avez écrit : > "fake...@fakessh.eu" writes: > > I have two domain names sign with dkimproxy > > fakessh.eu and renelacr

Re: help with dkimproxy

I have correctly configure 2 domain names thanks for all peace for all nb : "Buddha" peace themselve Le samedi 4 juillet 2009 06:35, Byung-Hee HWANG a écrit : > "fake...@fakessh.eu" writes: > > I have two domain names sign with dkimproxy > > fakessh.eu an

sasl2auth how to

hi all hi list m you can specify how to configure sasl2auth for anything other than authentication PLAIN updated my postfix to postfix-2.5.1-1.mysql.sasl2.vda.rhel5.i386.rpm thanks for all your feedbacks nb : "Buddha" peace themselve

Re: sasl2auth how to

contain all the information necessary to the good functioning of sasl2authd. it often depends of OS Le dimanche 5 juillet 2009 20:18, Byung-Hee HWANG a écrit : > "fake...@fakessh.eu" writes: > > hi all > > hi list > > > > > > m you can specify how to

how to have amavisd-new dkimproxy and implemented in master.cf and main.cf

hi list hi all how to have amavisd-new dkimproxy , and implemented in master.cf and main.cf "Buddha" peace themselve

[SOLVED]Re: how to have amavisd-new dkimproxy and implemented in master.cf and main.cf

Le lundi 10 août 2009 17:47, Patrick Ben Koetter a écrit : > * fake...@fakessh.eu : > > how to have amavisd-new dkimproxy , and implemented > > in master.cf and main.cf > > Start here: > <http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/README.postfix.html> > > p...@rick

Re: ptr records set to localhost spammers

"Buddha" peace themselve that he spent the other day with the attack on the ml double bouncing for killer a post on our list, a UBE, I said that I had to send an email with my DK DKIM signatures They spoke on TV in the evening, the newspaper that the attack came from france I do not mention th

question about rfc

Hi all Hi list Following a crash of postfix, I posed the following question: email for emission it takes a field A on the dns server ? SL 'Buddha' peace themselve

Re: can't get postfix to work with amavisd-new

hi all hi list amavisd encounter many problems with selinux as described in the centos wiki. correction proposed by the selinux centos wiki is obsolete SL 'Buddha' peace themselve Le mardi 22 septembre 2009 21:55, Noel Jones a écrit : > On 9/22/2009 2:08 PM, Geoff Sweet wrote: > > Greetings e

Re: Need help with configuration ...

google provide many documentation for differents shemas for mysql table nb : 'google est ton ami' Le vendredi 9 octobre 2009 20:42, Rene Bartsch a écrit : > > Rene Bartsch wrote: > >>> Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote: > Rene Bartsch wrote: > >> Rene Bartsch wrote: > >>> Hi, > >

Re: If you wanna have some fun...

This computer seems to address Brin Craig this infects Le samedi 14 novembre 2009 21:59, Evan Platt a écrit : > At 12:53 PM 11/14/2009, you wrote: > >http://www.SPAM.SPAM.host.sk/BWpzYBwiK2.html > > As if the .sk isn't enough warning, don't bother clicking on the link. > > Someoene's either s

a test user account with postfix

hi all hi list hello, I carry on my installation of postfix, a test user account in which the test user account I reserve the right to grant or not the test account I would like to do safely I do not find myself on the black list RBLs after 24 hours I quote this message on the list postfix

Re: Sender ID Filtering

Le dimanche 22 novembre 2009 09:49, Sahil Tandon a écrit : > On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, Roman Gelfand wrote: > > Could somebody recommend software that filters based on sender id > > reputation. I am refering to the sender id that microsoft uses as > > opposed to SPF. > > Some people use sid-milter, whi

Re: Sender ID Filtering

ix for mail gateway. My backend mail server exchange 2007 > with anti spam activated. I find that often when I get a response > NONE of PASS using sid-milter, I get FAIL on exchange server. Is my > sid-milter an old version? > > Thanks again > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at

Re: valid checkers for POSTFIX/DKIM/DOMAINKEYS

Le mercredi 25 novembre 2009 03:55, Israel Garcia a écrit : > Hi > > I'm really sorry if it's OT but I'm having problems verifying my setup > of postfix/dkim/domainkeys. I've found some dkim/domainkeys online > checkers, one told me dkim/domainkeys valid others checkers not. When > sending the sam