Got one domain not receviing mail at all.
I did a DNS serial number restart,
check the relevant files in postifx
and still no go.
When I do
telnet mail. 25
The answer is correct.
I am running 100s of Domains at this is the only one experiencing this
problem.
What do I need to do to fix this
Hello, I am trying to migrate first my outgoing mail server from
postfix 2.7.0 to exim 4.71 .
I got most of it except that when I send mail locally it is ending up in
postfix's maildrop queue and not in exim.
huh?
All right the configure file looks like:
# It is usually a good idea to test a
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 09:52:12AM -0300, Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 9:44 AM, The Doctor wrote:
> > Hello, I am trying to migrate first my outgoing mail server from
> > postfix 2.7.0 to exim 4.71 .
> >
>
> ?
>
> > I got most of it
Right I am tyring to get postfix with amavisd-ng to probe and stop virus and
spam mail.
However it seems that localhost is going through without scrutiny and
some incoming e-mail is not being stopped.
postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
body_checks = reg
Dear Wietse,
There is a bug in Postfix that should looked at immediately.
FRom
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.comp.mail.postfix/browse_thread/thread/fa83dc31cec1194e#
In case you think I am being pompous, I am not.
Found the problem, a filter was set to 120.0.0.1 instead of 127.0.0.1 .
I
First off apologies for the rather sharp tone:
A case of too many agngry customers breathing down the neck.
Anyhow I have been since recover been getting many of these:
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System
-
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on doctor.nl
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 06:35:52PM -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
> The Doctor wrote, On 4/22/10 5:38 PM:
>> First off apologies for the rather sharp tone:
>>
>> A case of too many agngry customers breathing down the neck.
>>
>> Anyhow I have been since r
Just continuing
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System
-
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham
version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: postmaster
Delivered-To: p
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 03:02:30PM -0700, brian moore wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:38:06 -0600
> The Doctor wrote:
>
>
> > Out: 220 doctor.nl2k.ab.ca ESMTP Postfix (2.8-20100323)
> > In: mail-iw0-f172.google.com
> > Out: 402 4.5.2 Error: command not
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 11:48:16AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Stan Hoeppner:
> > Wietse Venema put forth on 4/24/2010 8:39 AM:
> >
> > > - Your mail server is suffering from 100x red-shift due to the
> > > rapid expansion of the universe.
> > >
> > > Sending Postfix off into space to study t
You were saying about complete life cycle and non-verbose logs
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System
-
Return-Path: double-bou...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 06:36:48PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Here is my reconstruction from this inadequate logging sample.
>
> > Apr 24 13:20:10 doctor doctor[31]: postfix/smtpd[17053]: 0762D12CFB0D:
> > client=defout.telus.net[204.209.205.55]
> > Apr 24 13:20:41 doctor doctor[31]: postfix/c
Question has anyone in postfix and / or amavis ever seen
repeating e-amils with binary attachments to them?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist
rising!
http://twitter.com/roo
Tracing and tracking.
Question is:
If you suspect your web (whether www,http,httpd user )
how can you do a header check and pin where the source of
spam is coming from?
All I need is a check that will send to local users - go ahead
and if to a massive amount of users WITHOUT a local
user REJECT
Symptom: Any message with a binary attached seems
to end up looping.
Anyone here wants a sample from the logs?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist
rising!
http://twitter.co
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 12:45:19AM +0300, Appliantologist wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I had a situation where some of my users had compromised machines and
> someone is brazil and indiawere able to authorize themselves to use
> sendmail using the login then send scenario. Recently we changed
> hosti
ains = multiterminal.ua
> virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual
>
>
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Terry Gilsenan
> wrote:
> > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On
> > Behalf Of Appliantologist [octo...@gmail.com]
- Forwarded message from -
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham
version=3.3.1
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 10:00:55
Just reading from amavisd docs on the how set up
DKIM and I was wondering if this section of their documentation
is correct:
Configuring multiple mail paths in Postfix
Here is one way of configuring Postfix for providing two paths through a
content filter. Locally submitted or authenticated mail
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:21:26AM +1300, Jeremy Bowen wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I'm probably missing something really obvious but I can't see what I'm
> doing wrong.
>
> I have a server which I wish to use to host both my primary domain (eg.
> example.com) and several virtual domains (virtual1.com, vi
Doctor Who saying in the 1970s.
What do I need to reverse.
Tried another MTA and got reports that people were not getting e-mail.
All right switch back.
Forgot that the 'sendmail' was not the correct one.
No problem, just use the postfix sendmail.
Hmm!! No mail is getting delievered.
What di
In my log I am seeing
Oct 16 16:06:30 doctor doctor[31]: postfix/smtpd[23000]: NOQUEUE: filter: RCPT
from snt0-omc1-s39.snt0.hotmail.com[65.54.61.76]: : Sender address
triggers FILTER amavisfeed:[127.0.0.1]:10026; from=
to= proto=SMTP helo=
Oct 16 16:06:30 doctor doctor[31]: postfix/smtpd[23000
What are the improvements for postfix 2.7.2 and postfix 2.8 ?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist
rising!
http://twitter.com/rootnl2k http://www.facebook.com/dyadallee
Are you
REcently I have noted that virtual_alias_domains is growing.
Is their some way for main.cf to look a file up instead of
having to read a whole line?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware A
I am trying to send via majordomo but yet
I do see
Dec 1 10:35:28 doctor doctor[31]: postfix/error[22238]: 371E112CFAB3:
to=, relay=none, delay=157827, delays=157783/43/0/0.21, dsn=4.3.0,
status=deferred (unknown mail transport error)
This is the first time I have seen this.
What can done to
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 12:47:13PM -0500, Matt Hayes wrote:
>
>
> On 12/1/2010 12:45 PM, The Doctor wrote:
> > I am trying to send via majordomo but yet
> > I do see
> >
> > Dec 1 10:35:28 doctor doctor[31]: postfix/error[22238]: 371E112CFAB3:
> > to=,
What is the best internediary for
postfix
ClamAV
Spamassassin
tnef and
Blacklisting phishers
??
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
Never Satan President Republic!
Rudeness is the weak man's imitat
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 01:53:29PM -0700, Joe Sloan wrote:
> The Doctor wrote:
>> What is the best internediary for
>>
>> postfix
>> ClamAV
>> Spamassassin
>> tnef and
>> Blacklisting phishers
>>
>>
>
> I like maia mailguard - h
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 05:50:27PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> The Doctor wrote:
>> What is the best internediary for
>>
>> postfix
>> ClamAV
>> Spamassassin
>> tnef and
>> Blacklisting phishers
>>
>> ??
>>
>
> I like amavisd-
Right, I find in my log:
Jun 21 22:22:51 incoming postfix/smtpd[10649]: warning: smtpd_sasl_auth_enable
is
true, but SASL support is not compiled in
Yes I did compile as follows:
make tidy;
make makefiles CCARGS="-DUSE_SASL_AUTH -DUSE_CYRUS_SASL -DUSE_TLS
-I/usr/contrib/include/ -I/usr/co
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 09:21:52AM +0100, Steve wrote:
> Silly question. Currently I have Postfix using Spamassassin as a content
> filter thus;
>
> smtp inet n - - - 10 smtpd
> -o content_filter=spamassassin
> ...
> spamassassin unix - n n
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 03:52:15PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * The Doctor :
>
> > I am contemplating howto use spamassassin effectively with postfix.
>
> Usually we use amavisd-new
I tried runing amavisd but it is running into weird errors.
--
Member - Liberal Inte
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 08:08:40PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * The Doctor :
>
> > I tried runing amavisd but it is running into weird errors.
>
> It's the wrong list here, but usually one shows the errors and is
> being helped :)
Anyway to use the spamassas
Looks as if postifx will not send to mailbox
which has close to 50M in the mailbox.
Can this be overriden?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
Never Satan President Republic!
Rudeness is the weak ma
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 09:02:19PM -0700, Evan Platt wrote:
> At 08:54 PM 6/23/2009, you wrote:
>> Looks as if postifx will not send to mailbox
>> which has close to 50M in the mailbox.
>>
>> Can this be overriden?
>
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html
>
> mailbox_size_limit (default: 5120
Right
1) Upgraded to postfix 2.7 20090607 release
and no error message in SASL, YAY!!!
However,
Jul 2 20:38:57 doctor doctor[31]: postfix/smtpd[6175]: warning: milter
unix:/var/run/milter/milter-clamc.socket: can't read SMFIC_OPTNEG reply packet
header: Broken pipe
Jul 2 20:38:57 doctor do
I seem to be have fun with a secondary server Issue.
1) Telling root to go to another user ends up going
to the other user on the primary server. Huh? Why is that?
2) I have compiple SASL but cannot get it run properly despite matching
my ns1 record and adjusting it accordingly?
Any suggest
Where is the postfix 2.7-20090607 can this be found?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
Never Satan President Republic!
The fool says in his heart, "There is no God". They are corrupt, and their way
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 12:32:53AM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Jul 2009, The Doctor wrote:
>
> > Where is the postfix 2.7-20090607 can this be found?
>
> milter_header_checks was introduced in snapshot 20090606, and revised in
> 20090607. To download Postf
Right, Primary server So far so good.
Secondary server,
Everyting I set root to a localhost alias
postfix wants to send to the primary server.
Huh? Why is postfix overriding localhost?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca God, Queen and country!
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 07:04:57AM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> On Tue, July 7, 2009 07:00, The Doctor wrote:
>
> > Huh? Why is postfix overriding localhost?
>
> postconf -n
>
> none have so far as i know a working crystall ball :)
>
> --
> xpoint
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 11:20:56PM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> On Tue, July 7, 2009 07:25, The Doctor wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 07:04:57AM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, July 7, 2009 07:00, The Doctor wrote:
> >>
> >
Get a turkey that seems to be doing a 302 redicrecting
and using www@ to 'frame' the point.
Any way of locking down the use of the www to just webforms on the
local web server?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca God, Queen and country! Beware Anti
Right I have the following colocated box with
the following configuration:
$postconf -n
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
debug_peer_level = 2
enable_server_options = yes
header_chec
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:57:24AM +0200, Victoriano Giralt wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> The Doctor escribió:
> | Right I have the following colocated box with
> | the following configuration:
>
> 8<-8<
> removed extra info
>
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:38:42AM -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> The Doctor wrote:
> > Right I have the following colocated box with
> > the following configuration:
> >
> >
> > $postconf -n
> >
> > mailbox_command = /u
postconf -n
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
debug_peer_level = 2
enable_server_options = yes
header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks
home_mailbox = Mailbox
html_directory
I have set everything up as per normal but
one customer on one domain reports all mail coming in blank.
What should I be looking for?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist
risi
Is there a way to rate limit what a user can send?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist
rising!
http://twitter.com/rootnl2k http://www.myspace.com/502748630
Merry Christmas 2
People are sending to a name domain and yet most of their suppliers
are getting bouncing stating error in domain.
I check the DNS record and the MX is correct.
The virtual and the amin.cf files are also correct.
Where else sould I look?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 07:19:21AM -0400, Curtis Maurand wrote:
>
>
>
> I would argue that its partially Microsoft's fault for allowing
> scripts in email or from web pages to have access to anything on your
> machine outside of the message viewer or the browser. ActiveX is not
> your friend in
- Forwarded message from User -
X-Original-To: postmas...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
Delivered-To: postmas...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
Authentication-Results: doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (amavisd-new); dkim=pass
header.i=@gmail.com
Authentication-Results: d
I suspect my web user is sending spam out.
Only Postfix is stopping this.
How can I check to see
1) who is using the web user to send mail
and
2) by what script
?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Re
http://www.nk.ca/blog/index.php?/archives/1275-Phishing-spam-mail-script-intercepted.html
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist
rising!
https://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k
Onta
Any issues with Berkeley DB > 4.7 with current Postfix ?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist
rising!
https://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k
Birthdate : 29 Jan 1969 Croydon, Surre
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 05:01:29PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> [An on-line version of this announcement will be available at
> http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.9.2.html]
>
> Postfix stable release 2.9.2, and legacy releases 2.8.10, 2.7.9,
> 2.6.15 are available. They contains worka
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 08:21:05PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> The Doctor:
> > gcc -Wmissing-prototypes -Wformat -DUSE_SASL_AUTH -DUSE_CYRUS_SASL
> > -DUSE_TLS -I/usr/include -I/usr/contrib/include/
> > -I/usr/contrib/include/sasl -DHAS_PCRE -g -O -I. -I../
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 08:59:53PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> The Doctor:
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 08:21:05PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > The Doctor:
> > > > gcc -Wmissing-prototypes -Wformat -DUSE_SASL_AUTH -DUSE_CYRUS_SASL
> > > > -DUSE
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 07:18:07AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> The Doctor:
> > > If the BSD/OS 4.x compiler dies on #ifdefs in an argument list
> > > like this:
> > >
> > > SSL_set_options(TLScontext->con,
> > >
Using the most current version of Amavis and Postfix.'
I would like to know how to exclude a virtual domain say dom.tld ?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www
All right.
Amavis is beginning to anny me as a plugin:
Big reason many a legit PDF is getting rejected and customers are yelling
loud in stereo!!
What must I do to remove Amavis from the postfix sequence without disrupting
Postfix itself?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.
I was wondering who is the best CA Cert for Postfix?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Merry Christmas 2012 and Happy New Year 2013
-
Direct Question:
How can postfix used TNEF without an external agent
such as Amavis or MailSCanner?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 02:59:25PM +, Duane Hill wrote:
> On Monday, 10 December, 2012 at 14:49:47 UTC, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
> confabulated:
>
> > Direct Question:
>
> > How can postfix used TNEF without an external agent
> > such as Amavis or MailSCanner?
>
> > --
> > Member - Liberal
Please stop using NJABL
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 amnd 53 on Atheism
--
This message has been scanned for
I want to avoid perl-ware like amavisd and MailScanner
Any recommendations for a milter that would drop high spam?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfo
Just trying out the new mopher
but I run into
r 19 11:06:12 doctor doctor[31]: postfix/smtpd[16632]: warning: milter
unix:/var/spool/postfix/mopherd/mopherd.sock: can't read SMFIC_CONNECT reply
packet header: Operation timed out
Why?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.
Try spamass-milter on Postfix 2.10
Using http://www.malgouyres.fr/linux/spamass-milter_postfix_en.html
and got
Mar 19 11:25:16 doctor spamass-milter[23742]: Could not retrieve sendmail macro
"i"!. Please add it to confMILTER_MACROS_ENVFROM for better spamassassin
results
Mar 19 11:26:09 doc
All right, I have been getting a lot of irregular throttling=20
since Saturday midnight.
Script started on Sat May 25 17:54:34 2013
doctor.nl2k.ab.ca/~$egrep '(warning|error|fatal|panic)' :' /var/log/maillog
May 25 08:05:53 doctor postfix/postscreen[29851]: fatal: set DB cache size
131072: Inva
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 08:04:47AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> The Doctor:
> > All right, I have been getting a lot of irregular throttling
> > since Saturday midnight.
> >
> > May 25 08:05:53 doctor postfix/postscreen[29851]: fatal: set DB cache size
> > 13107
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 06:37:17AM -0600, The Doctor wrote:
> On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 08:04:47AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > The Doctor:
> > > All right, I have been getting a lot of irregular throttling
> > > since Saturday midnight.
> > >
> > &
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 06:37:17AM -0600, The Doctor wrote:
> On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 08:04:47AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > The Doctor:
> > > All right, I have been getting a lot of irregular throttling
> > > since Saturday midnight.
> > >
> > &
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 07:29:03AM -0600, The Doctor wrote:
> On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 06:37:17AM -0600, The Doctor wrote:
> > On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 08:04:47AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > The Doctor:
> > > > All right, I have been getting a lot of irregular thr
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 09:51:41AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> The Doctor:
> > On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 06:37:17AM -0600, The Doctor wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 08:04:47AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > > The Doctor:
> > > > > All
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 09:58:31AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> The Doctor:
> > > You may also play with berkeley_db_read_buffer_size. The Berkeley
> > > DB documentation promises that they accept buffer sizes of 20kB or
> > > more, and their default is 256kB. If s
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 10:37:26AM -0400, Jerry wrote:
> On Sun, 26 May 2013 07:55:25 -0600
> The Doctor articulated:
>
> > On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 09:51:41AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > The Doctor:
> > > > On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 06:37:17AM -0600, The Do
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 06:26:06PM -0500, vi...@vheuser.com wrote:
> Something's amiss...
> First time in 10 years I've gotten this:
>
> "An error occurred while processing your request.
> Reference #30.24721cb8.1612134453.1a374d81"
>
> from here:?? https://www.spamcop.net/
>
> Something has
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 07:25:43PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> > On Mar 28, 2016, at 5:53 PM, jaso...@mail-central.com wrote:
> >
> > How would I match/block access to mail sent from MTAs that have FQDNs that
> > start with
> >
> >mta-wk-*
> >
> > it's not a header, it's not content,
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 06:57:43AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> David Benfell:
> > Sorry, I'm still not getting it. The only thing I could see to do
> > differently was to put the long make makefiles line all on one line without
> > continuations. Thus,
> >
> > make tidy \
> > && make mak
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 07:33:56AM -0700, @lbutlr wrote:
> I???m going to setup a new machine and move all the mail onto it. I???ll go
> with the latest FreeBSD (11.0-RELEASE currently). I am currently running
> postfix-current-3.2.20161204.
>
> My plan is:
>
> 1) Setup FreeBSD on new hardware
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 06:26:52AM +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> * J Doe :
> > I am looking to use either Cyrus or Dovecot for both SASL authentication and
> > IMAP. While Postfix 3.1.0 supports both, I was wondering which to prefer if
> > security is my most important deciding factor ? Doe
/09/18 14:58, The Doctor wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 09:31:23AM +0100, Matt Caswell wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/09/18 09:05, Dr. Matthias St. Pierre wrote:
>>>> Von: openssl-users Im Auftrag von The
>>>> Doctor
>>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 11
82 matches
Mail list logo
