IMHO, preventing emails with differing from and sender values is contradictory
to valid usage of email. You are better off rate-limiting, as was already
suggested, and employing better mail content analysis through policy servers.
Ron Scott-Adams
r...@tohuw.net
"We are stuck with techn
Not at all. asgljgsglhg.aergohgergearguaoreg.gaegergheagaerhgaerhgopaeg is just
as much an FQDN as mail.google.com.
Ron Scott-Adams
r...@tohuw.net
"Soap and education are not as sudden as a massacre, but they are more deadly
in the long run." (Mark Twain)
On Jun 7, 2013
I’ve updated a working user on this test server from r...@tohuw.net to
r...@joab.tohuw.net. Under the previous address, I could successfully complete
a telnet session and convey mail for r...@tohuw.net to the local MTA.
After changing the user’s mail attribute in LDAP to r...@joab.tohuw.net and
!
On Feb 26, 2014, at 3:40 AM, l...@grootstyr.eu wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 01:44:07AM -0500, Ron Scott-Adams wrote:
>>
>> I?ve updated a working user on this test server from r...@tohuw.net to
>> r...@joab.tohuw.net. Under the previous address, I could successfully
. I’ll keep plugging away.
Thanks for the help, everyone.
On Feb 26, 2014, at 6:51 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ron Scott-Adams:
>> Telnet sessions in which I use RCPT TO:r...@joab.tohuw.net fail
>> with "550 5.1.1 : Recipient address rejected:
>> User unknown in local rec
, at 11:29 PM, Ron Scott-Adams wrote:
> Wietse,
>
> Thank you for the reply. However, I didn’t have any entry for “ron” in the
> maps previously. I think it’s as Matthijs indicated, and something is going
> on in the Dovecot side. I clearly need to re-read docs I haven’t visited i