Here's what I did:
Create file 'stripauth' with the following line:
/^(Received:.*)$/ REPLACE X-Recieved: From Authenticated User
In master.cf:
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
-o smtpd_helo_restrict
Hi all,
Was wondering if anyone would be willing to share what DNSBL and weights
they are using with Postscreen.
Thanks,
Rod
I am receiving the following message when testing (not enabled) postscreen:
smtp postfix/postscreen[1516]: warning: cannot connect to service
private/smtpd: No such file or directory
The following are my main.cf entries:
smtp pass- - - - - smtpd
On 5/19/2012 6:20 PM, Rod K wrote:
I am receiving the following message when testing (not enabled)
postscreen:
smtp postfix/postscreen[1516]: warning: cannot connect to service
private/smtpd: No such file or directory
The following are my main.cf entries:
smtp pass
Heh, that d is elusive. Thanks.
On 5/19/2012 9:09 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Rod K:
On 5/19/2012 6:20 PM, Rod K wrote:
I am receiving the following message when testing (not enabled)
postscreen:
smtp postfix/postscreen[1516]: warning: cannot connect to service
v
private
The following appeared in my logs:
May 28 01:08:24 smtp postfix/postscreen[12800]: CONNECT from
[59.7.57.23]:46426
May 28 01:08:24 smtp postfix/dnsblog[13615]: addr 59.7.57.23 listed by
domain bl.spamcop.net as 127.0.0.2
May 28 01:08:24 smtp postfix/dnsblog[13616]: addr 59.7.57.23 listed by
do
On 5/30/2012 12:54 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:45:18AM -0500, I wrote:
Yes, and it was brought up before and fixed.
http://www.mail-archive.com/postfix-users@postfix.org/msg33631.html
was the discussion, 2011-March.
2.8.7
Missed the previous mentions.
Yes, I've seen that this week as well.
On 6/2/2012 12:44 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
I am seeing hundreds (on higher volume days, over a thousand) of lines
like:
Jun 2 10:04:30 mx1 postfix/dnsblog[58868]: warning: dnsblog_query:
lookup error for DNS query 23.124.167.115.b.barracudacentral.org:
It would probably be in the startup script in /usr/local/etc/rc.d
If all else fails you could always create a symlink.
On 6/29/2012 11:12 AM, motty.cruz wrote:
Hello,
I have two instances of Postfix on the same machine running, all working
fine, except when I reboot the machine I get the follow
--Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Viktor Dukhovni
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 8:20 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: 2instances Postfix on FreeBSD 9
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:16:11AM -0400, Rod K wrote:
I have a client request that any outbound emails sent by a specific user
be BCCd to another email address in the organization. Any ideas on how
best to accomplish this?
Thanks!
On 9/19/2012 12:24 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:25:18AM -0400, Rod K wrote:
I have a client request that any outbound emails sent by a specific
user be BCCd to another email address in the organization. Any
ideas on how best to accomplish this?
Sounds like you want
On 2/11/2013 11:13 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Hello,
I am using Postfix 2.9.4 on CentOS 6.3 as a gateway server with the
following postscreen settings:
postscreen_dnsbl_threshold = 2
postscreen_dnsbl_sites =
b.barracudacentral.org*2,
zen.spamhaus.org*2,
psbl.surriel.com*2
postscreen_dnsbl_act
Postfix is not configured to accept mail for mhm.lv
On 4/8/2013 9:30 PM, Indiana Jones wrote:
Dear Sirs,
From these error messages below, could you possibly advise what the
reason might be that
I am not able to receive messages into my Postfix-Dovecot mail server!
OS: FreeBSD 9.1
Postfix 2.9.5
On 4/15/2013 8:24 AM, Jan P. Kessler wrote:
Hi,
sorry, I know this is not directly related to postfix but I know that
there are several very experienced people reading this list. My question
is how you (the people that use and administer mailservers) handle the
localpart case sensivity accordin
On 4/15/2013 9:44 AM, Jan P. Kessler wrote:
localpart case sensivity according to rfc5321:
"The local-part of a mailbox MUST BE treated as case sensitive."
You are misunderstanding. Relaying MTAs MUST treat the local-part as
case sensitive. IOW, until the message is received at the destination
As I understand it Postfix only allows a single line return from a
policy server.
e.g. this is valid:
REJECT Because I want to\n\n
but this is not:
PREPEND X-MYHEADER: this is my added header\nDUNNO\n\n
If that is the case I want to clarify that a PREPEND or REDIRECT reply
will result as a
On 10/24/2014 2:47 PM, Julio Cesar Covolato wrote:
Hi.
Hello!
Is there a way to limit connections from web applications on the same
server for postfix?
The web application sends messages via smtp on localhost (127.0.0.1:25).
Need to limit the maximum 5k messages per hour. Is that possible?
R
On 10/24/2014 4:47 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 24.10.2014 um 22:41 schrieb Rod K:
On 10/24/2014 2:47 PM, Julio Cesar Covolato wrote:
Hi.
Hello!
Is there a way to limit connections from web applications on the same
server for postfix?
The web application sends messages via smtp on
ues)?
If either of the answers is negative, can someone point me in a
direction to where I can achieve this with a policy server, or will I
have to use a content filter?
Thanks,
Rod K
On 2/17/2015 9:03 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:52:12PM -0500, Rod K wrote:
I want to create a policy server that will process once per recipient. My
understanding is that this would work when placed under
smtpd_recipient_restrictions. Is this correct?
Yes.
My
I'm currently configuring a new server using Postfix/Dovecot. My
previous experience is with Courier and I've been using Postfix's
virtual lda. I want to start using dovecot-lda.
Here's the issue, I have several external forwards such as
joeb...@internal.tld > joeb...@external.tld where exte
On 3/12/2015 6:35 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 3/12/2015 5:28 PM, Rod K wrote:
I'm currently configuring a new server using Postfix/Dovecot. My
previous experience is with Courier and I've been using Postfix's
virtual lda. I want to start using dovecot-lda.
Here's the i
On 3/12/2015 7:06 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 3/12/2015 6:03 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 3/12/2015 5:50 PM, Rod K wrote:
On 3/12/2015 6:35 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 3/12/2015 5:28 PM, Rod K wrote:
I'm currently configuring a new server using Postfix/Dovecot. My
previous experience is with Co
Postscreen is successfully blocking a lot of spam for us. Our DNSBL
settings are doing a great job, however I'm having one "false
positive." One of our customers does a bit of business with a Chinese
firm. Their rep from this firm is using the nefarious 163.com as their
service provider. Of
On 4/30/2015 10:15 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/30/2015 8:59 AM, Rod K wrote:
Postscreen is successfully blocking a lot of spam for us. Our DNSBL
settings are doing a great job, however I'm having one "false
positive." One of our customers does a bit of business with a
Chinese f
I'm trying to implement
check_client_restrictions =
check_client_access pgsql:/path/to/local_blacklist-sql.cf,
...
Previously I had the same information in a cidr:
check_client_access cidr:/path/to/local_blacklist.cidr,
When I check with postmap
postmap -q 1.2.3.4 pgsql:/path/to
On 5/7/2015 1:48 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Rod K:
I'm trying to implement
check_client_restrictions =
check_client_access pgsql:/path/to/local_blacklist-sql.cf,
Note that this also makes queries with client name parent domains
and network prefixes (see the section "HOST NA
On 5/7/2015 3:01 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Rod K:
*DUNNO* Pretend that the lookup key was not found. This prevents Postfix
from trying substrings of the lookup key (such as a subdomain
name, or a network address subnetwork).
"
This to me means the
On 5/8/2015 3:33 AM, Tobi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Am 07.05.2015 um 18:43 schrieb Rod K:
I'm trying to implement
check_client_restrictions = check_client_access
pgsql:/path/to/local_blacklist-sql.cf, ...
have you had a look at postfix postscreen featue?
On 5/12/2015 7:55 PM, Peter wrote:
On 05/08/2015 04:43 AM, Rod K wrote:
check_client_restrictions =
There is no such setting, you probably want smtpd_client_restrictions.
Peter
Yes I did. Should have been
smtpd_client_restrictions = check_client_access
Using "FILTER {destination}" one can use a policy server to set/override
an after queue filter, but is there anyway to set/override a before
queue proxy filter from a policy server?
On 7/2/2015 1:52 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 01:44:45PM -0400, Rod K wrote:
Using "FILTER {destination}" one can use a policy server to set/override an
after queue filter, but is there anyway to set/override a before queue proxy
filter from a policy server?
N
On 7/2/2015 1:52 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 01:44:45PM -0400, Rod K wrote:
Using "FILTER {destination}" one can use a policy server to set/override an
after queue filter, but is there anyway to set/override a before queue proxy
filter from a policy server?
N
34 matches
Mail list logo
