Apparent buffer overflow from huge headers

2008-08-12 Thread Robert Cohen
probably have to be using a content filter to properly test it. === Robert Cohen Systems & Desktop Services Division of Information R.G Menzies Building Building 2 The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200 Australia T: +61 2 6125 8389 F: +61 2

Re: Apparent buffer overflow from huge headers

2008-08-13 Thread Robert Cohen
puremessage. Its been reported to sophos, so if it is the milter, then they will doubtless provide a patch. I assumed it wasn't the milter because restarting postfix even without restarting the milter fixed the problem, I'm pretty sure. And the problem didn't occur with sendmail wi

Re: Apparent buffer overflow from huge headers

2008-08-13 Thread Robert Cohen
On 14/8/08 12:11 PM, "Wietse Venema" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Cohen: >> ul 27 12:43:23 mailin2 postfix/smtp[29137]: 4CBB07E8009: >> to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10025, delay=137638, >> delays=137638/0/0/0, dsn=4

Re: Apparent buffer overflow from huge headers

2008-08-14 Thread Robert Cohen
On 14/8/08 11:25 PM, "Wietse Venema" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Cohen: >> So if a filter botches handling one message, postfix gives on sending it >> anything for up to 15 minutes? >> That doesn't seem like a particularly graceful way

Re: odd error sent to postmaster

2008-09-17 Thread Robert Cohen
complain about random spurious keywords appearing in main.cf Anyway Ive removed it now, and will report it to puremessage. Apparently we arent using any smtpd_restriction_classes. But I can't see why that would be relevant. On 17/9/08 6:40 PM, "Jan P. Kessler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED