On Saturday 23 May 2009 10:15:41 Sthu Pous wrote:
> Nice to see You here, Mouss! Thank You for Your time and answer, again:
> > Instead of this, use the 3d option: "Use the STARTTLS command ..."
> >
> > STARTTLS is the standard method for doing SSL/TLS in ESMTP.
>
> Ok. So I've done and here what I
On Wednesday 10 June 2009 13:46:08 Sthu Pous wrote:
> Thank You for Your time and answer, Wietse:
> > See my other reply. The server does not announce STARTTLS support.
>
> I got it already, also I have posted here my current configuration
> (postconf -n), could You please tell me what to edit, or
On 11.07.2011, at 12:40, Damien Robinet wrote:
This issue is not to be solved in postfix, but in any kind of front-end
(organizational first, then maybe technical).
> We have many agencies that can use our mail server.
> Each agency has one or more domain name. They can add their domain in
On Friday 20 March 2009 02:52:42 Brandon Hilkert wrote:
> As I mentioned, we're using the XFS system for the queue, does that provide
> any additional benefit, or would ext3 perform the same? Keep in mind, we
> will be dealing with 1,000,000 piece mailouts during a session. My findings
> were that
On Friday 20 March 2009 12:04:22 Brandon Hilkert wrote:
> Is a simple ext3 partition usually the recommend file system?
Please do not top post.
We use ext3 to have simple, repeatable, clear server setups without surprises
or pitfalls. Performance is good enough for our needs, so I never actually
On Saturday 09 May 2009 23:31:43 Just E. Mail wrote:
> % make -f Makefile.init makefiles \
>'CCARGS=-DHAS_PGSQL -I/usr/local/include/pgsql' \
>'AUXLIBS=-L/usr/local/lib -lpq'
>
>
> Since I have pg Server & Client machines, I have no idea where is
> '-I/usr/local/include/pgsql' & '-
On Monday 11 May 2009 14:43:43 Just E. Mail wrote:
> Rainer:
>
> This my school project. I am setting up a new machine with just CentOS
> 5.3 installed and then I will first install PostgreSQL. Can you kindly
> give me the name of the files I need to install and in what order.
>
> Thank you, Rainer
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 13:02:08 Sthu Pous wrote:
[...]
> 454 4.7.0 TLS not available due to local problem
>
> And what is the local problem? Some permissions?
Read the log (and post it if you need help).
Rainer
On Wednesday 10 June 2009 14:00:28 Sthu Pous wrote:
> > Read the log (and post it if you need help).
>
> I do not know why but now I get error:
>
> 502 5.5.1 Error: command not implemented
>
> on server side I see:
>
> lost connection after STARTTLS from unknown[1.2.3.4]
Honestly, you don't sound
Hi Wietse,
thanks for addressing this issue, a scaling solution for this problem will be
really appreciated.
We are an E-Mail Marketing provider and offer a hosted solution for a broad
customer base for which we want to be able separate the reputation (so
individual customers can take part in
On Wednesday 08 October 2008 00:52:10 Noel Jones wrote:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
> > The SMTP client's source IP address is controlled with smtp_bind_address,
> > otherwise it is inherited from inet_interfaces (when this specifies
> > one non-localhost IP address).
> >
> > However, making the IP addr
On Wednesday 08 October 2008 00:52:15 Victor Duchovni wrote:
> It is possible to cause the outgoing transport to depend solely on the
> incoming IP in some special cases, but this is not something I am inclined
> to recommend to anyone. So I would prefer to pretend it is generally not
> possible, r
On Friday 10 October 2008 15:46:46 Wietse Venema wrote:
> Rainer Frey (Inxmail GmbH):
> > On Wednesday 08 October 2008 00:52:10 Noel Jones wrote:
> > > Will the FILTER action accept an empty nexthop?
> >
> > It seems it does not (at least not correctly). If the nex
On Monday 20 October 2008 13:51:45 Wietse Venema wrote:
> > There are two loop detection mechanisms. You override one with []
> > around the next-hop domain. This mechanism is based on MX lookups.
> > You override the second one with myhostname, or a non-standard TCP
> > server port. This mechanis
14 matches
Mail list logo
