I've set up a mailserver with postfix, dovecot, amavis and spamassassin.
Everything has been up and running for a year now until I noticed my
spamfilter wasn't performing as it should; spam mails sent to a normal
user were getting the right treatment and ended up in Spam-box, whereas
the same mail
Op 29/12/2010 16:13, Jeroen Geilman schreef:
On 12/29/10 2:44 PM, Philip Van Pelt wrote:
I've set up a mailserver with postfix, dovecot, amavis and spamassassin.
Everything has been up and running for a year now until I noticed my
spamfilter wasn't performing as it should; spam mails
mouss schreef op wo 29-12-2010 om 19:20 [+0100]:
> Le 29/12/2010 18:25, Philip Van Pelt a écrit :
> >[snip]
> > Dec 29 13:48:31 test-services amavis[11240]: (11240-02) Passed SPAM,
> > -> , quarantine:
> > k/spam-kEzi169drbKm.gz, Message-ID:
>
mouss schreef op wo 29-12-2010 om 20:01 [+0100]:
> Let me ask my question more precisely: is the _string_ after the '@'
> sign the same for both addresses? please note that I am not talking
> about delivery or virtual things. just the string.
The domain (the _string_ after the @) is exactly the sa
Dennis Guhl schreef op wo 29-12-2010 om 20:14 [+0100]:
[snip]
>
> It seems you have a condition in your sieve script which only matches
> t...@example.com but not al...@example.com.
>
Well, I thought about that one too. But as I examine the mail in my
mailbox, no X-Spam-Flag is present. So the pr
