Message not retransmitted immediately after opportunistic TLS handshake failure

2017-06-22 Thread Nik Kostaras
, but Postfix moves the message to deferred queue rather than retrying immediately in plaintext. What is the reason of the timeout between the incoming_arrival and active_arrival (var_min_backoff_time) of a message, before the message is allowed to be immediately retransmitted? Many thanks, Nik Kos

RE: Message not retransmitted immediately after opportunistic TLS handshake failure

2017-06-22 Thread Nik Kostaras
FTER_STARTTLS_FAILURE. Nik -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema Sent: 22 June 2017 20:17 To: Postfix users Subject: Re: Message not retransmitted immediately after opportunistic TLS handshake failure Nik Ko

RE: Message not retransmitted immediately after opportunistic TLS handshake failure

2017-06-22 Thread Nik Kostaras
e not retransmitted immediately after opportunistic TLS handshake failure On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 06:14:08PM +0000, Nik Kostaras wrote: > In one of my tests I'm configuring Postfix client (smtp) to use > opportunistic TLS with TLSv1.2 protocol only Don't do that. See RFC7435.

smtpd_discard_ehlo_keyword_address_maps support for hostnames

2017-09-11 Thread Nik Kostaras
functionality on hostnames? (and if left empty it doesn't perform any checks). Many thanks, Nik Kostaras Team Leader [Telephone] +44 118 903 8635 [Twitter]@clearswift [Clearswift] <http://www.clearswift.com/> 1310 Waterside | Arlington Business Park | Theale | Berkshire | RG7 4SA | Uni

RE: smtpd_discard_ehlo_keyword_address_maps support for hostnames

2017-09-11 Thread Nik Kostaras
If you are interested I can send a patch with a new config option. Many thanks, Nik Kostaras -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema Sent: 11 September 2017 16:57 To: Postf

RE: smtpd_discard_ehlo_keyword_address_maps support for hostnames

2017-09-12 Thread Nik Kostaras
ut writing first the documentation how this is supposed to behave? If a feature needs more text for its limitations than for its functionality, then perhaps that is a sign of a problematic feature? Wietse Nik Kostaras: > Hi Wietse, > > Very good question! > >From my

OCSP stapling

2017-11-20 Thread Nik Kostaras
) Is it something that will be in the roadmap? Many thanks, Nik Kostaras Team Leader [Telephone] +44 118 903 8635 [Twitter]@clearswift [Clearswift] <http://www.clearswift.com/> 1310 Waterside | Arlington Business Park | Theale | Berkshire | RG7 4SA | United Kingdom Adaptive Secu

RE: OCSP stapling

2017-11-22 Thread Nik Kostaras
Thanks Viktor! Regards, Nik This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are strictly confidential, may be privileged and are intended only for use by the addressee unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the intended recipient any use, dissemination, printing or copying is strictly prohi