No filters for authenticated users

aemon in master.cf which uses other port, and not put any filter on it. ¿Another approach to this issue? -- Thanks, Jordi Espasa Clofent

Re: "nobody is going to write a new MTA"

x27;aggressively' +info: http://www.openbsd.org/policy.html http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq1.html#HowAbout And yes, the history behind PF origin is curious at least. -- Thanks, Jordi Espasa Clofent

virtual(8) with content_filter ¿?

Hi all, In my master.cf I have: smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o content_filter=filtres So, when mailserver recieves a mail, it passes through 'filter' (is a perl-based script which control the auto-reply, quota and anti-spam). Nice here. The problem comes w

Re: virtual(8) with content_filter ??

On 02/01/2010 01:14 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Jordi Espasa Clofent: Hi all, In my master.cf I have: smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o content_filter=filtres All mail that arrives via smtpd is filtered, even if it is sent between local users, or users in the

Re: virtual(8) with content_filter ??

If the content filter does not produce auto-replies between users in the same domain, then that is a bug in the content filter. Completey clear now. Thanks for aclaration. -- I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear

Re: load balancing among mail servers

Use your favorite load-balance app. You have several options in BSD or GNU/Linux flavors. Personally I use with total success LVS+heartbeat to load-balance 3 Posfifix (only to send) with 70k account behind. ;)

Selective alias depending on FROM?

Hi all, I've a PHP script which is executed by 'www-data' (the httpd user) local user in Debian GNU/Linux box. I use this smtpd box as massive mailing remainder to all of our costumers. Because of that I need to know the costumers haven't could be contacted, so I want to redirect these boun

Re: Selective alias depending on FROM?

On 04/07/2010 10:43 AM, Levente Birta wrote: I think it is easier to config the return path when you send the mails. Yes, it's easy to insert a mail header as "ReturnPath" when you build the warning mail using PHP, but I read in RFC2821: "When the delivery SMTP server makes the "final deliv

Wildcard certificate warning

Hi all, I've configured a TLS/SSL smtpd in a box as follows: # postconf -n | grep -i tls smtpd_tls_cert_file = /usr/local/home/example.com.crt smtpd_tls_key_file = /usr/local/home/example.com.key smtpd_tls_loglevel = 2 smtpd_tls_received_header = yes smtpd_tls_session_cache_database = btree:/usr

Wildcard certificate warning

Hi all, I've configured a TLS/SSL smtpd in a box as follows: # postconf -n | grep -i tls smtpd_tls_cert_file = /usr/local/home/example.com.crt smtpd_tls_key_file = /usr/local/home/example.com.key smtpd_tls_loglevel = 2 smtpd_tls_received_header = yes smtpd_tls_session_cache_database = btree:/usr

Re: Postfix and Postgrey Part II

http://blog.minibofh.org/?p=45 -- I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.

Re: Looking for opinions on FreeBSD OS for Postfix

Branch 7.x it's more superior than 6.x in networking performance. * UFS2 it's good, but sometimes it's a bottleneck (especially if your're using a sof-RAID as gmirror(8). It's a good thing to tune FS. -- Thanks, Jordi Espasa Clofent

Don't filter the users

Hi all, I've a Postfix working with Perl-based filter. All works fine, but I don't want filter the legitimate users (who are authenticated using SASL) when they want to do massive mailing using their e-mail client (ThunderBird, Outlook... and so on). I can do it easily hacking the actual Pe

Re: Don't filter the users\

That is easy. Have your users connect to the submission port, and let everyone else connnect to the smtp port. Then, specify "=o content_filter=whatever" for the smtp port and not for the submission port. Yes Wietse, I've considered this simple and clean option, but we're a hosting company an

Re: Don't filter the users

You can tell the users that the "submission" port gets a better level of service than port 25, because they share that port with spammers. As you pointed out in your original email, they would be subject to less filtering, and therefore there would be less delay, less false positives, and so on.

Re: OT: need some advice as to distro

Always is the same: the best option is the best for you needs. So, the best could be any distro that you feel comfortable with. Obviously there're out there some distros which are server-oriented (CentOS, Debian) or desktop-oriented and so on, but really it doesn't matter. Choose your favorite

anvil(8) and RBLs

$smtpd_client_recipient_rate_limit ¿Who will rejected the mail, RBLs restriction or anvil(8) restriction -- Thanks, Jordi Espasa Clofent

smtpd_client_recipient_rate_limit

recipients according the anvil(8) config. But ¿what happens with the 10 last ones? ¿The sender MTA re-send the complete mail (with 30 recipients again) or the non-delivered mail part (with the 10 last ones)? ¿The sender MTA send any notification to the sender account? -- Thanks, Jordi Espasa

More questions about anvil(8)

MTP-sender logs that it try to deliver again an again, but SMTP-reciever (with anvil(8), of course) rejects it. -- Thanks, Jordi Espasa Clofent

Re: anvil and ip exclusions

http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_client_event_limit_exceptions -- Thanks, Jordi Espasa Clofent