Hi list,
I have a Postfix setup with Dovecot SASL. Other MTAs drop their mail at
my host (without authentication obviously) and I have a couple of
clients which drop their relay mail off after authentication. So, a
pretty standard setup.
For SASL authentication I have hashed passwords in the back
On 31.01.2014 01:41, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:54:01AM +0100, Johannes Bauer wrote:
>
>> What I would like to do and cannot figure out: How can I *force*
>> authenticated clients to perform a STARTTLS before performing a "AUTH
>> PLAIN"
On 31.01.2014 02:22, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>> You're a genius! Thank you so much, this is exactly what I wanted.
>>
>> If we ever meet in person, be sure to claim your well-deserved beer :-)
>
> Instead of buying me a beer, you can pay me back in kind and take
> 5-10 minutes to read Section 1.2
Hi list,
I've recently switched around my mail configuration so that Postfix
delivers to dovecot using LMTP over TCP (couldn't get Unix socket to
work unfortunately, sigh). Anyways, here's the scenario:
I have multiple virtual mailboxes, fed from virtual_mailbox_maps.
There's one main user and se
Am 17.05.2016 um 00:23 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
>
>> On May 16, 2016, at 6:16 PM, Johannes Bauer wrote:
>>
>> I have multiple virtual mailboxes, fed from virtual_mailbox_maps.
>> There's one main user and several aliases to that user. Mail needs to be
>> d
Hello list,
I know this is a bit off-topic, but I'm not sure if I misconfigured
Postfix to result in this: Just today, an email of mine was rejected due
to SPF reasons:
host mx-ha03.web.de[212.227.15.17] said:
550-Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable
550-Reject due to SPF policy.
550-
Hi list,
I'm having an issue with my Postfix configuration: Currently I've it set
up so that one authentication SASL login (e.g., m...@foo.com) supports
multiple virtual email addresses (e.g., m...@foo.com but also
f...@foo.com, b...@foo.com).
Once authenticated with m...@foo.com, the envelope se
Hi there,
I know this is a bit off-topic here, but I'm completely desparate right
now and am clueless if there's anything wrong with my MTA configuration
that I completely overlook. I have a Postfix mail server running that
serves multiple domains. All users are fully authenticated and need to
use
Hi Bastian,
On 16.03.19 11:28, Bastian Blank wrote:
> So your _provider_ is on the the MS blacklist. Netcup did not show up
> on my radar, but I don't know what else.
>
>> Here's what I've checked/tried:
>> * Neither I nor any of my users send spam. The mail volume is VERY low.
>
> It is reall
Hey Bill,
On 16.03.19 18:37, Bill Cole wrote:
>>> You MTA is known under different names:
>>>
johannes-bauer.com mail is handled by 10 johannes-bauer.com.
spornkuller.de mail is handled by 10 spornkuller.de.
>>
>> Is this a problem?
>
> It should not be. There are no CNAMEs involved, s
Hi Wesley,
On 17.03.19 13:44, Czarek wrote:
> Check if you are not an open relay. Configure SPF, DKIM, DMARC
> and Reverse DNS.
Except for DMARC I have all of the above.
> Than contact to the spam lists.
How so?
Best regards,
Johannes
11 matches
Mail list logo
