Re: SMTPD resctrictions question

Hi, Jannis Achstetter schrieb: > An email (FROM is not in $mydestination) from an unauthenticated user to > an address in $mydestination is accecpted. This is also fine. > An email from an unauthenticated user to any destination but > $mydestination (open relay) is denied. Perfect. > BUT: Any emai

Re: Postfix, SASL sending mail through Postfix.

BABEDH-DHRA schrieb: > mail:~# ls -al /var/spool/postfix/private/auth > srw-rw 1 postfix postfix 0 2010-05-16 11:33 > /var/spool/postfix/private/auth That looks sane, too. > I am not sure about your second question. Especially Cisco-systems are known to mess up SMTP Traffic, so is there a R

Re: Debian argument.. postfix hostname

Victor Duchovni schrieb: > On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 08:36:52PM +0200, Moe wrote: > > My point is: When 'myhostname' and 'mydomainname' are left out of > > main.cf then postfix makes an attempt to auto-detect them. > > These are MTA configuration variables. And there would also be the fix in Postfi

Re: Debian argument.. postfix hostname

Stan Hoeppner schrieb: > Jan Kohnert put forth on 6/3/2010 5:55 PM: > > Or let the Debian people write that patch for their version, as their > > users are apparently the only ones who comlain and such a fix could > > probably mess up more postfix-experienced users... ;) &g

Re: Debian argument.. postfix hostname

Victor Duchovni schrieb: > This is entirely inappropriate and unnecessary. Well, I must admit, I got heated up a bit in this discussion, and should have rethinked my words more before posting. Sorry about that, and my apologies to Moe. -- MfG Jan signature.asc Description: This is a digitall

Re: Force users to auth.

Rachid Abdelkhalak schrieb: > mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, localhost, $mydomain > mynetworks = 10.78.0.0/16, 10.82.0.0/19, 127.0.0.0/32 > relay_domains = $mydestination, $mydomain > relayhost = [192.168.10.2] > smtpd_sender_restrictions = > permit_sasl_authenticated >

Re: SASL fine from iPhone, not from Nokia?

Am Tuesday 13 October 2009 15:52:32 schrieb Simon Wilson: > Now my wife has just got a Nokia E51. When it tries to send using SMTP > to the same port 587, it tries to use CRAM-MD5, and the send fails: > > Oct 13 23:35:37 server04 postfix/smtpd[988]: setting up TLS connection > from unknown[58.171.2

Re: Don't filter the users\

Mikael Bak schrieb: > Submission on port 587 implies STARTTLS (I think). Well, only if you configure it that way. (OK, it *really* makes sense to encrypt transfer, if you do authentication...) But: jan...@kohni ~ $ telnet smtp.web.de 587 Trying 217.72.192.157... Connected to smtp.web.de. Escape

Auth/relaying issues with 2.10.0

Hi folks, I have recently upgraded to 2.10.0 (gentoo) and now having some issues with relaying authenticated users. I'm using dovecot sasl and according to the logs auth works fine, but however postfix thinks I do not want to relay stuff from authenticated users anymore... Here's the log ent

Re: Auth/relaying issues with 2.10.0

Hi there again, Am Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2013, 01:08:09 schrieb Jan Kohnert: > I have recently upgraded to 2.10.0 (gentoo) and now having some issues > with relaying authenticated users. I'm using dovecot sasl and according > to the logs auth works fine, but however postfix thinks I

Re: Auth/relaying issues with 2.10.0

Hi, Am Dienstag, 4. Juni 2013, 18:24:23 schrieb /dev/rob0: > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 01:08:09AM +0200, Jan Kohnert wrote: > > I have recently upgraded to 2.10.0 (gentoo) and now having some > > issues with relaying authenticated users. I'm using dovecot sasl > > and

Re: Auth/relaying issues with 2.10.0

Hi again, Am Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2013, 01:34:13 schrieb Jan Kohnert: > Am Dienstag, 4. Juni 2013, 18:24:23 schrieb /dev/rob0: > > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 01:08:09AM +0200, Jan Kohnert wrote: > > > I have recently upgraded to 2.10.0 (gentoo) and now having some > >

Re: Auth/relaying issues with 2.10.0

Hi, Am Donnerstag, 6. Juni 2013, 20:06:48 schrieb Michael Orlitzky: > Postfix 2.10 on Gentoo adds the safety net, but the package manager > won't automatically clobber files under /etc. You're supposed to run a > tool (etc-update) afterwards to merge any changes. I'm guessing that's > what got ski

Re: STARTTLS not announced?!

Am Samstag, 15. Juni 2013, 03:45:02 schrieb Benny Pedersen: > Nabil Alsharif skrev den 2013-06-15 02:59: > >>> smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes > >> > >> this disable starttls since we already is using ssl/tls now > > > > huh? This part I don't quite understand. How are we disabling TLS? > > Where was

Re: STARTTLS not announced?!

Am Samstag, 15. Juni 2013, 04:03:44 schrieb Benny Pedersen: > Jan Kohnert skrev den 2013-06-15 03:58: > > Well, no, it disables AUTH without tls/ssl but not STARTTLS, IIRC. > > starttls have nothing to do with auth or not Come on, read the documentation: http://www.postfix.org/