I am new to the list.
This is on OS-X Server 10.6.3 on an Xserve with postfix 2.5.5 that came
with the system.
I have a situation where using zen.spamhaus.org , spam gets through
despite zen saying that IP is bad.
here is a sample error message:
connect from cpe-67-252-139-22.buffalo.res.rr.co
Wietse Venema wrote:
>> connect from cpe-67-252-139-22.buffalo.res.rr.com [67.252.139.22]
>> May 19 01:09:15 velo postfix/smtpdP26473]: warning:
>> 22.139.252.67.zen.spamhaus.org: RBL lookup error: Host or domain name
>> not found. Name service error for name=22.139.252.67.zen.spamhaus.org
>> type
Wietse Venema wrote:
> Your problem report had ZERO evidence that other Spamhaus lookups
> succeed. Given a useless problem report, we are just wasting each
> other's time.
Thank you for your time. I will conclude that the software is perfectly
able to handle DNS replies with multiple IP addresse
I last posted here some 11 years ago and it didn't end well, hoping to
restart on better foot,
Situation: OS-X Snow Leopard server, with Postfix that came built by Apple.
According to postconf -d , Mail version: Postfix 2.5.14
Thurst of first question: find out what options Appl
responding to Viktor Dukhovni and Bill Cole:
First, thanks to both . Put me on right path.
> Is that still your target platform, or are you now building for a newer>
> Apple machine?
For now sticking to Snow Leopard. But if I had to upgrade, some upgrades
removes the Apple supplied server softw
On 2021-03-10 13:58, Antonio Leding wrote:
> I’ve been digging into restriction lists a bit more and grinding away
> on the rationale between seperating restrictions across each of the
> first four lists (CLIENT, HELO, SENDER, & RECIPIENT) vs. just placing
> them all in RECIPIENT.
This is from
On 2021-03-10 15:08, Noel Jones wrote:
> This is incorrect. With the default smtpd_delay_reject=yes, all
> evaluations are performed after the client sends RCPT TO.
Thanks for clarification. Reading the docs of delay_reject brings up
another question:
"Wait until the RCPT TO command before e
