>>>>> On January 2, 2025 Bill Cole via Postfix-users
>>>>> wrote:
> On 2025-01-01 at 20:13:35 UTC-0500 (Wed, 01 Jan 2025 20:13:35 -0500)
> Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users is rumored to
> have said:
>> I just noticed a single unknown host is c
>>>>> On January 1, 2025 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
>>>>> wrote:
> Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users:
>>
>> Hello all and Happy New Year!
>>
>> Is there some documentation for the list of tags, their meanings,
>> and the format
>>>>> On January 1, 2025 Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
>>>>> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 01, 2025 at 08:13:35PM -0500, Greg Klanderman via
> Postfix-users wrote:
>> I'm fine with allowing a little probing, especially if the host
>> doing so has
> On January 7, 2025 Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>> I found smtpd_service_name, and guessing I could use that to
>> replace the part after '/'? Would changing that have any
>> functional impact, or only the logs?
> Yes, it would break tools like "collate" that you might
>>>>> On January 2, 2025 Bill Cole via Postfix-users
>>>>> wrote:
> On 2025-01-02 at 16:47:00 UTC-0500 (Thu, 02 Jan 2025 16:47:00 -0500)
> Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users is rumored to
> have said:
>>>>>>> On January 2, 202
Hello all and Happy New Year!
Is there some documentation for the list of tags, their meanings, and
the format for the value after '=' for the 'disconnect from' log
lines?
For example:
| disconnect from X[IP] ehlo=1 auth=0/1 rset=1 quit=1 commands=3/4
I believe auth=0/1 indicates that aut
> On January 1, 2025 Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
> As the operator of a "responsible" SMTP survey engine:
> https://stats.dnssec-tools.org/about.html
> https://stats.dnssec-tools.org/
> that connects just a few times a day (once per IP address of an MX
> host, wi
Hi,
I just tried adding '-o syslog_name=postfix/submission' to master.cf
for my submission port, as I would like to be able to distinguish log
lines for the two smtpd ports. I had expected it to completely
replace 'postfix/smtpd' at the beginning of the log line, but now see
it only replaces 'p
Hi,
Am I correct that the after greeting tests are turned off by default?
I believe they are controlled with the variables
postscreen_pipelining_enable,
postscreen_non_smtp_command_enable, and
postscreen_bare_newline_enable
which are all set to no on my mail server, but I am seeing the logging
Hi Bill
Thanks for your reply..
>>>>> On April 17, 2025 Bill Cole via Postfix-users
>>>>> wrote:
> On 2025-04-17 at 16:15:20 UTC-0400 (Thu, 17 Apr 2025 16:15:20 -0400)
> Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users
> is rumored to have said:
>> Hi,
>
>>>>> On April 13, 2025 Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
>>>>> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2025 at 08:12:26PM -0400, Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>> Am I not able to match on the client FQDN in postscreen_access_list?
>> I.e. us
Am I not able to match on the client FQDN in postscreen_access_list?
I.e. using a hash: table?
I was hoping I could kill .ip.linodeusercontent.com and other such
garbage very early/quickly and just switched to using postscreen to
implement that..
Is the only option to turn off smtpd_delay_rejec
>>>>> On April 13, 2025 Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
>>>>> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2025 at 10:19:29PM -0400, Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>> > This has little to do with hash tables, but as documented in
>> > https://
> On April 14, 2025 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> wrote:
> 100% of the clients that pregreet will be in error.
Great, thank you Wietse!
> Allowlisting remote domains based on their reverse DNS is pointless.
I was only interested in blocking based on reverse DNS.
(given your confir
14 matches
Mail list logo
