[pfx] Re: logging strangeness

2023-05-16 Thread Eugene R via Postfix-users
Hello, Am I correct that the string in question should normally contain the SASL response? While the "Password:" is apparently some interactive prompt, indicating that something might be wrong with the connection or configuration? Eugene On 16.05.2023 17:06, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: logging strangeness

2023-05-17 Thread Eugene R via Postfix-users
But it seems that all the useful information is already shown in the dovecot log line (unless we want to differentiate SASL vs IMAP auth failures for some reason). Eugene On 17.05.2023 14:06, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users: [ Charset ISO-8859-2

[pfx] Re: Maildir filename format

2023-07-31 Thread Eugene R via Postfix-users
Hello, Those "ugly characters" are there for a reason: they are specified by the Maildir standard (and the Dovecot's extensions to it) to encode various metadata such as message ID, size, flags, etc https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maildir https://cr.yp.to/proto/maildir.html https://doc.dovecot.

[pfx] Re: Maildir filename format

2023-07-31 Thread Eugene R via Postfix-users
wrote: > On 2023-07-31 15:24, Eugene R via Postfix-users wrote: Those "ugly characters" are there for a reason: they are specified by the Maildir standard (and the Dovecot's extensions to it) to encode various metadata such as message ID, size, flags, etc https://en.wikipedi

[pfx] Re: Maildir filename format

2023-07-31 Thread Eugene R via Postfix-users
But what is wrong with simply moving the message from one folder to another in the mail client? You can also use sieve scripts to automate retraining whatever mail filter you use. On 31.07.2023 16:52, Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users wrote: Dnia 31.07.2023 o godz. 15:38:01 Fourhundred Thecat vi

[pfx] Re: Maildir filename format

2023-07-31 Thread Eugene R via Postfix-users
Magic ))) seriously, check the specs in the links I sent recently. On 31.07.2023 16:34, Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users wrote: > On 2023-07-31 15:09, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote: On 2023-07-31 at 02:43:28 UTC-0400 (Mon, 31 Jul 2023 08:43:28 +0200)     1690633510.M94611123819.mail,S

[pfx] Re: Maildir filename format

2023-08-09 Thread Eugene R via Postfix-users
Best wishes Eugene ⁣Get BlueMail for Android ​ On 10 Aug 2023, 04:49, at 04:49, H via Postfix-users wrote: >On 07/31/2023 09:24 AM, Eugene R via Postfix-users wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Those "ugly characters" are there for a reason: they are specified by >the Ma

[pfx] Re: Maildir filename format

2023-08-10 Thread Eugene R via Postfix-users
, every machine that delivers to the maildir must have its own hostname. Within one machine, every delivery within the same second must have a different delivery identifier. ⁣Get BlueMail for Android ​ On 11 Aug 2023, 03:35, at 03:35, H via Postfix-users wrote: >On 08/10/2023 01:25 AM, Eug

[pfx] Re: User unknown in local recipient table (in reply to RCPT TO command)

2024-10-28 Thread Eugene R via Postfix-users
Hello ps -axww is supposed to show the full command line On 28.10.2024 21:08, Ken Gillett via Postfix-users wrote: Does 'postconf daemon_directory' simply return info from the main.cf, or does it query the running process to get exactly what is being used? Yes, on MacOSX Server there are 2 e

[pfx] Re: smtp_tls_security_level defaults question

2024-10-25 Thread Eugene R via Postfix-users
Hello, On 24.10.2024 08:24, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote: Yes, of course, as documented. TLS is off by default, this is backwards-compatible behaviour, and Postfix aims to not "surprise" operators with unexpected new behaviour after an upgrade. Default settings are in part also the