[pfx] broken links in postfix.org

2023-04-27 Thread Eray Aslan via Postfix-users
Some links seem to be broken in postfix.org downloads page http://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/index.html. Example: http://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/experimental/postfix-3.9-20230419.tar.gz I also do not see a link to postfix-3.7.5, 3.6.9 etc -- Eray

[pfx] Re: Value of client certificates, was: Re: Re: [ext] list.sys4.de fails with starttls

2023-09-26 Thread Eray Aslan via Postfix-users
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 05:51:05PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote: > Not, dangerous, just largely pointless, with *potential* complications, > unless there are servers that can actually make use of said > certificates. Can a case be made for promoting anonymous ciphers? I feel the

[pfx] DEF_DB_TYPE change?

2023-11-01 Thread Eray Aslan via Postfix-users
About 10 years ago, Oracle switched the licencing for Berkeley DB to AGPL. As a result, most distributions decided to stick to the versions prior to the licence change and there were (and are) some initiatives throughout the years to stop shipping Berkeley DB at the distro level. I am also not sure

[pfx] Re: DEF_DB_TYPE change?

2023-11-02 Thread Eray Aslan via Postfix-users
On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 09:41:07AM -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: > Eray Aslan via Postfix-users: > > Having said that, Berkeley DB is mature software and it works and is > > widely available in various *nixes. Still, would it be prudent or worth > > the effort

[pfx] Re: 25 years today

2023-12-16 Thread Eray Aslan via Postfix-users
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 08:20:26AM -0500, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: > As a few on this list may recall, it is 25 years ago today that the > "IBM secure mailer" had its public beta release. This was accompanied > by a nice article in the New York Times business section. Thanks a lot. N

[pfx] Re: chroot (as in Debian) or not? / documentation

2024-10-07 Thread Eray Aslan via Postfix-users
On Sun, Oct 06, 2024 at 11:06:21AM -0400, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote: > On 2024-10-06 at 04:34:16 UTC-0400 (Sun, 06 Oct 2024 10:34:16 +0200) > Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users > is rumored to have said: > > > Hey! > > > > Can someone explain this to me (being a newbie). > > That seems l

[pfx] Re: OT: Turning Postfix documentation into podcasts

2024-10-10 Thread Eray Aslan via Postfix-users
On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 02:52:02PM +1100, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote: > Right, can the AI suggest a first-draft main.cf/master.cf file combo in > response to a description of the user's requirements, and then refine > these as the problem statement is clarified? > > But then we run i

[pfx] postfix-3.11-20250713 build failure

2025-07-14 Thread Eray Aslan via Postfix-users
Hi, postfix-3.11-20250713 build fails with [...] multi_server.c: In function ‘multi_server_drain’: event_server.c: In function ‘event_server_drain’: multi_server.c:300:9: error: ‘return’ with no value, in function returning non-void [-Wreturn-mismatch] 300 | return; | ^~~~