[pfx] TLS issues

2023-07-12 Thread Emmanuel Seyman via Postfix-users
Hello, all. Last weekend, $WORK moved over to 2 smtp gateways running postfix/clamav/spamassissin. This setup has been running with only one issue: two domains refuse to accept mail from us. Investigating this, we realized that both domains use the same mail servers and that they both require TL

[pfx] Re: [ext] TLS issues

2023-07-12 Thread Emmanuel Seyman via Postfix-users
* Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users [12/07/2023 11:15] : > > Try adding: > smtp_tls_key_file = $smtpd_tls_key_file > smtp_tls_cert_file = $smtpd_tls_cert_file Once I added this to my main.cf and reloaded postfix, I saw that emails were getting correctly delivered. Thank you, Ralf! Emmanuel _

[pfx] smtpd_sender_restrictions and spoofing

2023-07-18 Thread Emmanuel Seyman via Postfix-users
Hello, folks. I use postfix on two mail gateways and I'm seeing inbound mail using one of my domains. I thought I could block this using smtpd_sender_restrictions but, even after adding the following line to /etc/postfix/main.cf: smtpd_sender_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, \

[pfx] Re: smtpd_sender_restrictions and spoofing

2023-07-18 Thread Emmanuel Seyman via Postfix-users
* Emmanuel Seyman via Postfix-users [18/07/2023 11:19] : > > @mydomain.comREJECT > @anotherdomain.com REJECT Removing the '@' makes the list work. Emmanuel ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To

[pfx] Fallback virtual_transport

2024-03-28 Thread Emmanuel Seyman via Postfix-users
Hello, all. I handle two SMTP gateways at $WORK which relay mail from the internet to an internel server and vice-versa. Accordingly, I have "virtual_transport = smtp:internal-host.example.com" in my main.cf . We recently had a network issue between the gateways and the internal host, after whi

[pfx] Re: FYI: SORBS Closing announcement from the mailop list.

2024-06-05 Thread Emmanuel Seyman via Postfix-users
* Bill Cole via Postfix-users [05/06/2024 12:33] : > > Others have said elsewhere that she posted it to her LinkedIn account > as well, which you may be able to confirm. https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7202108788026335233/ Emmanuel

[pfx] SPF hostname and domainname

2024-06-20 Thread Emmanuel Seyman via Postfix-users
Hello, all. Since yesterday, I've started seeing email from my servers getting rejected due to SPF problems. 550 5.7.23 : Sender address rejected: Message rejected due to: SPF fail - not authorized. Please see http://spf.libraesva.com/Why?s=helo;id=mail01.my-company.com;ip=192.168.52.130;r=do

[pfx] Re: question about relay hostname

2024-07-25 Thread Emmanuel Seyman via Postfix-users
* Corey H via Postfix-users [25/07/2024 11:09] : > > relayhost = [mail.example.net]:587 > but what does this mean with '[]' and hostname in it? >From the documentation[1]: "The form [hostname] turns off MX or SRV lookups." Emmanuel 1: https://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#relayhost ___

[pfx] Re: Postfix in containers/kubernetes

2024-10-18 Thread Emmanuel Seyman via Postfix-users
* Nico Schottelius [18/10/2024 20:39] : > > In the best case scenario you get one > hit with a lot of favorites/stars/whatever and an indication that the > image is official. That means as a user it is trustworthy and you can > run your workload with it. The fact t

[pfx] Re: Postfix in containers/kubernetes

2024-10-18 Thread Emmanuel Seyman via Postfix-users
* Nico Schottelius via Postfix-users [18/10/2024 10:55] : > > - Others might start using my postfix container due to the lack of an > official postfix container [2] > - To avoid that, my recommendation is that the postfix project provides a > container itself This is the part I don't get. Why i

[pfx] Re: Postfix in kubernetes - short status update

2024-10-29 Thread Emmanuel Seyman via Postfix-users
* Nico Schottelius via Postfix-users [29/10/2024 14:07] : > > Ohh, that is good to know. So as long as a couple of weeks before > expiration (think letsencrypt) the certs are renewed, it is virtually > guaranteed to work all the time? The lifetime of smtpd processes is determined via the max_use a

[pfx] Re: Searching for old Postfix 2.0.6 RPM-packaged for Red Hat 6.2 (classic)

2025-02-03 Thread Emmanuel Seyman via Postfix-users
* Josh Good via Postfix-users [31/01/2025 00:37] : > > There were community-provided RPM packages of Postfix for Red Hat 6.2 > (Classic), as noted in the original post for this thread, but none of > them seems to have survived on any publicly accessible repository today. I had the pleasure of meet