The government has nothing to do with it. Its NOT any law or mandate, just the
big email players are taking a second look in their infrastructure and adopting
better server configuration, such as domain keys, spf, and such.
Deives
---
BOFH excuse #383 - The cause of the problem is: Your proces
Olhando de esguelha pra ver se nao estava sendo observado, Dennis Carr
rabiscou em Thu, 07/01/2010, 06:49h:
> Currently, the method of delivery to my server is by way of an ssh
> tunnel to my server (deliver on localhost 2525 to get to the server),
> but the problem lies herein of security - if
Have you guys considered using Perdition to proxy/redirect IMAP/POP to
distribute backend storage to as many as backends as you want? You
wont need any SAN/NAS/NFS/GFS/whatever, just a user/storage mapping
(ldap, mysql, etc...), and you might even add spare or active/active
servers to each storage
Perdition works WITH dovecot (or whatever imap server you use). It's
just a proxy - will redirect connections based on username, origin,
etc...
Com profundas palavras de sabedoria, Priyanka Tyagi
concedeu iluminacao em Wed, 29/07/2009, 12:00h:
> Hi All,Is it possible to direct log messages for a specific instance (in a
> multi postfix instances setup) to a separate/specific log (other than
> /var/log/maillog).
it isnt "postfix" that lo
Perhaps you are running postfix on a chroot?
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Claudio Prono wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> This problem is made me mad all today, with no solution...
>
> My /etc/sasl2/smtp.conf
>
> pwcheck_method: authdaemond
> log_level: 3
> mech_list: PLAIN LOGIN
> authdaemond_path: /
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Charles Marcus
wrote:
>
> We recently started rolling out Win7 boxes (a year or so ago, but doing it
> slowly), and for some reason, Windows 7 clients don't show the hostname,
> only 'unknown':
>
> Sep 13 10:46:09 mailhost postfix-587/smtpd[16228]: C2B50A7D5B0:
> c
