I have setup my laptop (as a test) to send out and respond to ipv6 mail,
and not listen on the ipv4 ports at all. I tunnel my laptop out to
have a static ipv6 address, and have mx records (for the teklibre.org
domain) that have a priority 10 for the ipv6 "direct" connection, and a priority
20 mx r
d...@teklibre.org (Dave Täht) writes:
Half solved!
> I have setup my laptop (as a test) to send out and respond to ipv6 mail,
> and not listen on the ipv4 ports at all. I tunnel my laptop out to
> have a static ipv6 address, and have mx records (for the teklibre.org
> domain)
mouss writes:
> Dave a écrit :
>> Hello,
>> I'm running postfix, amavisd-new and spamassassin. Currently in my
>> postfix smtpd_recipient_restrictions right at the end last thing i have some
>> rbl checks. I'm wondering if that's the best place for them or should i
>> disable that and activa
Mark Martinec writes:
> On Sunday August 23 2009 04:10:06 Dave Täht wrote:
>> What I found after fighting with an exchange server that what seems to
>> work best is assigning my first mx host to be ipv6 only, and my fallback
>> to be a mx ipv6 and ipv4 host.
>
> My cho
A couple weeks back I started running most of the mail servers I am
responsible for over ipv6. (I posted a few notes to this list on that)
I'm trying to wrap my head around a new problem - trying to have two postfix
relays and a smart host co-exist where one of the relays is a tiny power
sipping
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) writes:
> Dave Taht:
>> So what I think I want to do is setup fallback relaying as follows:
>>
>> MX 5 mylaptop.example.org # if my laptop's up send mail there
>> MX 10 mytinyarmbox.example.org # if not, try my arm box
>> MX 20 mysmarthost.example.org # other
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) writes:
> Dave T?ht:
>> wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) writes:
>>
>> > Dave Taht:
>> >> So what I think I want to do is setup fallback relaying as follows:
>> >>
>> >> MX 5 mylaptop.example.org # if my laptop's up send mail there
>> >> MX 10 mytinyarmb
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) writes:
> Dave T?ht:
>> wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) writes:
>>
>> > Dave Taht:
>> >> So what I think I want to do is setup fallback relaying as follows:
>> >>
>> >> MX 5 mylaptop.example.org # if my laptop's up send mail there
>> >> MX 10 mytinyarmb
d...@teklibre.org (Dave Täht) writes:
One unanswered question from this series of emails:
>> Dave Taht:
>
> Would you take a patch that would let a crazed administrator disable
> *sending* mail on different protocols?
>
> The simplest version would imp
Stan Hoeppner writes:
> Dave Täht put forth on 10/6/2009 10:02 AM:
>> d...@teklibre.org (Dave Täht) writes:
>>
>> One unanswered question from this series of emails:
>>
>>>> Dave Taht:
>>> Would you take a patch that would let a crazed admin
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) writes:
> Dave T?ht:
>> d...@teklibre.org (Dave T?ht) writes:
>>
>> One unanswered question from this series of emails:
>>
>> >> Dave Taht:
>> >
>> > Would you take a patch that would let a crazed administrator disable
>> > *sending* mail on different protoco
Stan Hoeppner writes:
> Dave Täht put forth on 10/7/2009 2:40 PM:
>
>> I imagine you all were big fans of NETBUI and IPX/SPX too.
>
> That's a bit like comparing a German Shepherd and a Poodle to a Pig and
> a Giraffe. IPv4/IPv6 share the same architecture (same sp
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) writes:
> Stan Hoeppner:
>> Dave T?ht put forth on 10/7/2009 2:40 PM:
>>
>> > I imagine you all were big fans of NETBUI and IPX/SPX too.
>>
>> That's a bit like comparing a German Shepherd and a Poodle to a Pig and
>> a Giraffe. IPv4/IPv6 share the same arc
13 matches
Mail list logo
