I have a server running postfix on port 25 and a secondary mail
platform listening on port 2525. I have tried many combinations of
settings but keep getting:
Feb 12 08:34:43 server1 postfix/smtp[11104]: 19183EB01F0:
to=, relay=none, delay=6.9, delays=6.9/0.01/0/0,
dsn=5.4.6, status=bounced (mail
I am converting some sendmail boxes to postfix and can't find any
information about multiple destinations (preferably primary /
secondary).
Sendmail has a mailertable entry like this:
domain.com smtp:[primary.domain.com]:[secondary.domain.com]
It will only deliver to the secondary server wh
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Dave Jones:
>> I am converting some sendmail boxes to postfix and can't find any
>> information about multiple destinations (preferably primary /
>> secondary).
>
> If it is not documented, then it is not imp
The past few weeks or so my Postfix relays have been showing "unknown"
in the logs and headers for some (not all) hosts causing a hit on the
SpamAssassin RDNS_NONE rule. These servers have a local caching DNS
server on them that forward to another pair of caching DNS servers
that run BIND and rbld
>On 9/16/2013 5:41 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
>>
>> Received: from mail02.corp.ena.net (unknown [96.4.3.90])
>> by mr11.mail.ena.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C091480688
>> for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 16:04:46 -0500 (CDT)
>>
>> My forward DNS lookup for t
> Dave Jones:
> > >On 9/16/2013 5:41 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Received: from mail02.corp.ena.net (unknown [96.4.3.90])
> > >> by mr11.mail.ena.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C091480688
> > >> for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013
I have read the documentation and searched the web without any success.
Is it possible to setup a specific destination domain to not bounce
but always tempfail/requeue?
AOL bounces these back to our senders but I would like for them to
stay in the queue so I can resend them later. If they would
>Dave Jones:
>> I have read the documentation and searched the web without any success.
>>
>> Is it possible to setup a specific destination domain to not bounce
>> but always tempfail/requeue?
>You could configure a dedicated SMTP client in master.cf with "
I have to be overlooking something here but I have tripple
checked everything and read the documentation multiple
times.
I am trying to use https://github.com/stevejenkins/postwhite
to bypass postscreen checks, primarily dnsbl checks. It
appears that postscreen is not bypassing dnsbl checks:
mai
ss_list and the
smtpd_client_event_limit_exceptions that could bypass
dnsbl and rate limiting for SASL authenticated senders?
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Dave Jones:
>> I have to be overlooking something here but I have tripple
>> checked everything and read the documentat
smtpd_client_message_rate_limit=0
-o smtpd_client_new_tls_session_rate_limit=0
Are the *_limit=0 lines above correct for overriding the
main.cf values?
Thanks,
Dave
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 3:50 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 02:25:19PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
>> Is there somet
>Am 04.09.2014 um 18:23 schrieb LuKreme:
>>
>>dwl.spamhaus.org=127.0.2.[2;3]*-3
>>swl.spamhaus.org=127.0.2.[12;13]*-3
>AFAIR someone posted a few months ago that those lists are empty. Has that
>changed?
Nope. They are still empty. I just checked my fresh data feed and
they only have
I filter mail for a lot of mailboxes where I normally see 20+ messages from
account-security-nore...@account.microsoft.com per day.
The last one I see is on 10/1/14 at 13:25 GMT-5 (Central US).
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> [ Bcc to someone at Microsoft who may be abl
I have a sneaky spammer that is using compromised accounts of a mail server
that relays outbound through my Postfix servers. The spammer is Bcc'ing
200 or 300 recipients at a time and sending very slowly to avoid my high
volume detection. I need to be able to add a header that SpamAssassin can
us
stfix Policy Servers or daemons able
> to provide such kind of feature, like the X-Itools ELSE project with its
> RTAAM engine for example.
>
>
>
> Le 04/02/2015 14:34, Dave Jones a écrit :
>
> I have a sneaky spammer that is using compromised accounts of a mail
>> s
Thank you for the postfwd link. Not sure why I didn't find this during my
research. I guess I didn't have the right Google keywords. :)
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Dave Jones:
> > I need to be able to relay outbound for this customer of ours as
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
> On 04/02/15 12:41, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>>
>> Use postfwd, set a rule that triggers with too many recipients
>> per SASL login. http://www.postfwd.org/
>>
>> Wietse
>>
>
> Policyd can also do that, check both.
>
> http://w
smtpd_data_restrictions fixed my issue and I see the header now.
Thank you.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Dave Jones:
> > Feb 19 16:55:12 smtp1 postfwd[27034]: [RULES] rule=4, id=RCPTCNT1,
> > queue=C2B7433E7CE, client=unknown[172.27.0.203], sender=<
I know there is a "postfix check" that will do some basic checks of
permissions and directories, but is there a command that will check config
file syntax? For example, if an IP address is fat-fingered in the
mynetworks line, postfix will reload and run but gives "Temporary lookup
failure" errors
19 matches
Mail list logo
