you solve the problem?
Where is my error?
I think configuration 1) is the exact one, but how do I say to postfix that
domain is not local and to redirect it to the script (accepting all IPs)?
Thanks,
Andrea
2009/7/20 Andrea
> *But* I have some problems.
>
> 1) If I set:
> mydestination = mydomain.com, script.mydomain.com,
> every mail I receive on script.mydomain.com isn't redirected to script,
> and I receive "*Recipient address rejected*: *User unknown in local
> re
ows why this happens?
How can I force to have always 550 for inexistent domain on sender address?
This happens on both postfix 2.9.6-2 or 2.2.8-1.2
Thanks,
Andrea
2014/1/16 Wietse Venema
> Andrea:
> > Anyone knows why this happens?
> > How can I force to have always 550 for inexistent domain on sender
> address?
>
> Postfix will ALWAYS reply 450 after TEMPORARY lookup error.
> Doing otherwise would be a mistake.
>
>
lies with "Domain not found" in both cases, but with 450 if
domain is registered and its DNS is down, and with 550 if domains doesn't
exist. I didn't check existence of domains because I associated "Domain not
found" with unexistent domain.
Thanks,
Andrea
check with the first and if it fails to check
with the second one?
Thanks!
Andrea
2014-03-31 15:30 GMT+02:00 Patrick Ben Koetter :
>
>
> Configure saslauthd for rimap and the SQL auxprop for MySQL.
> Then expand pwcheck_method in smtpd.conf like this:
>
> pwcheck_method: auxprop saslauthd
>
Thanks, that's what I did but it seems not working.
saslauthd only works, auxprop sql o
2014-03-31 20:39 GMT+02:00 Patrick Ben Koetter :
> Any log?
>
>
Sure,
with:
pwcheck_method: saslauthd
mech_list: PLAIN LOGIN CRAM-MD5 DIGEST-MD5 NTLM
Using IMAP account works.
When I change smtpd.conf with:
pwcheck_method: auxprop saslauthd
mech_list: PLAIN LOGIN CRAM-MD5 DIGEST-MD5 NTLM
auxp
2014-03-31 20:57 GMT+02:00 Andrea :
>
> Mar 31 20:52:32 smtps postfix/smtpd[14221]: warning:
> unknown[192.168.0.42]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: authentication
> failure
> Mar 31 20:52:32 smtps postfix/smtpd[14221]: > unknown[192.168.0.42]: 535
> 5.7.8 Error:
2014-03-31 21:30 GMT+02:00 Patrick Ben Koetter :
> Hae you tried PLAIN with auxprop only? Use gen-auth, a script from John
> Jetmoore, to create auth strings and telnet to the server.
>
> p@rick
>
>
Yes, tried even now with help of gen-auth and testsaslauthd.
testsaslauthd works perfectly!
1) jus
2014-03-31 21:52 GMT+02:00 Andrea :
>
>
> 2014-03-31 21:30 GMT+02:00 Patrick Ben Koetter :
>
> Hae you tried PLAIN with auxprop only? Use gen-auth, a script from John
>> Jetmoore, to create auth strings and telnet to the server.
>>
>> p@rick
>>
>>
&g
n't seem a saslauthd problem but a postfix problem
2014-03-31 22:02 GMT+02:00 Andrea :
>
>
> 2014-03-31 21:52 GMT+02:00 Andrea :
>
>
>>
>> 2014-03-31 21:30 GMT+02:00 Patrick Ben Koetter :
>>
>> Hae you tried PLAIN with auxprop only? Use gen-auth, a script fro
2014-04-01 15:00 GMT+02:00 Viktor Dukhovni :
>
> No, it is a Cyrus SASL configuration problem, Postfix is just the messenger
> between Cyrus SASL and the SMTP client.
>
> Perhaps testsaslauthd is not the right tool to test with, because
> you're trying to use rimap, auxprop, ... which are not dire
2014-04-01 18:43 GMT+02:00 Viktor Dukhovni :
> One question we have not discussed is file permissions and chroot.
>
>
Yes I checked it: on the debian postfix is chrooted, on the centos not. It
seems everything ok, proof should be that if I remove auxprop and let just
saslauthd it works. If it was
of their
servers.. but is there some way to avoid it? Is there a way to tell postfix
to avoid tls1 if delivery fails?
Thanks!
Andrea
ender different from domain.com
if /.*xxx\.yyy\.zzz\.www/
!/.*(Ff)rom.*\@domain\.com.*/
reject This seems spam!
endif
Second rule seems to block every mail even from domain.com.
How can I do what I want?
I want some IP able to send mail just using some domains.
Thanks!
Andrea
Hi all.
Due to the demise of the Sixxs project, which I was using to bypass the
ISP’s filtering of port 25 (in/out), I would like to open a "private" port
on postfix.
It’s a non-standard port and I will be filtering the src range at firewall
level so I’m pretty confident there will be no abuse.
I
t can return a
transport:destination value?
Thanks,
Andrea
--
There can never be a computer language in which you cannot write a bad
program.
Ing. Andrea Gabellini
Ralf Hildebrandt ha scritto:
> * Andrea Gabellini :
>> Hello,
>>
>> I need to route emails that flow through my postfix/spamassassin gateway
>> to different hosts based on my own policy.
>>
>> I think I have to use the transport mechanism, but I can
Thank you.
I just compiled 2.6.5 with it and wrote a little tcp server with
Net::Server. I can use it in transport_maps returning a string "200
snmp:my_mail_host"
Andrea
Wietse Venema ha scritto:
> Ralf Hildebrandt:
>> * Andrea Gabellini :
>>
>>> I already
servers.
Thank you in advance
Andrea
evel domain should be used, but I'm not the admin of
the domain.com servers.
Thanks!
Andrea
> Don't use FILTER for mail routing; it affects all recipients of a message.
>
> Do use transport_maps entries to direct specific recipients to the correct
> mail server.
>
> # transport_maps
> example.com smtp:[IP1]
> u...@example.com smtp:[IP2]
>
I tried, but I have to know all addresses.
Or i
Hi. I have a little issue with postfix and dovecot. Below you can find
my actual configuration, this works well if I use virtual_transport =
virtual but if I add those lines:
transport_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_transport.cf
maildrop_destination_recipient_limit = 1
virtual_transport =
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 2011-07-29 18:37, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
>> my outbound traffic try to authenticate recipients and delivery fails
> My god, why is this so complicated ?
>
> You're adding extra transport maps to a transport that i
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 2011-07-29 21:20, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2011-07-29 18:37, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
>>>>
>>>> my outbound
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:34:54PM +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
>
>> > This is not difficult, as long as you don't override postfix' default
>> > behaviour with silly transport_maps that don'
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 7/29/2011 4:40 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:34:54PM +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
>>
>>>> This is not difficult, as long as you don't override postfix' default
>>
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 7/30/2011 3:23 AM, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Victor Duchovni
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:34:54PM +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
>>>
>>>>
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 12:20:40PM +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
>
>> >>>> Without transport_maps it doesn't works. If I set virtual_transport =
>> >>>> dovecot log returns relay=none
>
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 5:53 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:34:54 +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
>
>> transport_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_transport.cf
>> maildrop_destination_recipient_limit = 1
>> virtual_transport = virtual
>
>
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 09:56:35 +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 5:53 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:34:54 +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 8/3/2011 2:56 AM, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
>
>> If I set
>>
>> virtual_transport = dovecot
>>
>> outbound emails are always deferred.
>
> I gave you the correct fix for this a few days ago: 587 s
pears, but instead I would that after address
translation (alias --> real mailbox) the mail is injected in the postfix
queue as a normal mail, or better let the address translation occur
before amavis step
Is this possible?
--
Ing. Andrea Cappelli
Asidev s.r.l.
Via Osteria Bianca, 108/
t all.
If the same mail is sent directly to the real mailbox the headers are
added and the mail is moved to Spam directory through a sieve filter
Can anyone explain this behaviour?
--
Ing. Andrea Cappelli
Asidev s.r.l.
Via Osteria Bianca, 108/6A 50053 Empoli (Firenze)
Tel. (+39) 333 60 18
Il 22/08/11 22:51, Fernando Maior ha scritto:
Andrea,
How did you look at the final delivered mail? Did you use cat or vi or
another text editor? Cause if you just try using a webmail or mail client
you may not be able to see those headers...
Hi,
I saw the headers opening the file delivered
Hello!
How can I limit outgoing mail with postfwd?
I tried a simple rule like id=DEFAULT; action=dunno
Dec 16 18:44:40 sheldon postfwd[4000]: [RULES] rule=0, id=DEFAULT,
client=*[000.000.000.000], sender=,
recipient=, helo=<>, proto=ESMTP, state=RCPT, delay=0s,
hits=DEFAULT, action=dunno
specified in main.cf, also blocks emails from certain senders?
Right now I have:
smtpd_restriction_classes = nofilter
nofilter =
permit
If I create a new class, eg. allchecks, do I need to list every single
*sender, *client and *recipient that I already have by default?
Thanks.
Andrea
onfiguration to support user migration, both in and out,
from my server, during migration there is a window in which the mailbox
is up on both servers
Thank you
--
Ing. Andrea Cappelli
Asidev s.r.l.
Viale Rinaldo Piaggio, 32 - 56025 Pontedera (Pisa) @CERFITT
Via Osteria Bianca, 108/6A 50053 Empol
ase
I would Postfix check the MX record (which is still pointing to the
other server) before check local mailbox.
It's possible? Or the are better way to accomplish this?
--
Ing. Andrea Cappelli
Asidev s.r.l.
Viale Rinaldo Piaggio, 32 - 56025 Pontedera (Pisa) @CERFITT
Via Osteria Bianca, 108
c rules in
dovecot (eg sieve) to do it?
Moreover, I have recipient_bcc_maps on and the user requiring the
delimiter is listed there. Will the separator have any impact on that?
Thanks!
Andrea
27;m missing something but I can't figure what?
Anyone has a similar issue?
--
Andrea Cappelli
Asidev s.r.l.
Il 11/09/2012 12:58, Wietse Venema ha scritto:
First, test with "postconf -b". If the result is right then something
down-stream is messing up Postfix's bounces. Wietse
The test with postconf -b shows no error and expand the variable
$myhostname to the right value, but Charset and and other t
Il 11/09/2012 14:15, Wietse Venema ha scritto:
Basic Internet email: no whitespace before a header label. Wietse
Thank you for your support, now works as expected
Best regards
--
Andrea Cappelli
Asidev s.r.l.
_recipient and enable
recipient probe
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
reject_non_fqdn_recipient, permit_sasl_authenticated,
reject_unlisted_recipient, reject_unknown_recipient_domain,
reject_unauth_destination
Postfix is 2.9.6 on Ubuntu 12.04
Thanks
--
Andrea Cappelli
end mail. Any email originating
from the webmail for myfreemail.com will have to be diverted to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] without telling the sender. To him everything will
look like it went well and the delivery was successful.
My question is: can I accomplish something like that with postfix (and
my current virtual domain setup)?
Andrea
On Sat, 2008-09-06 at 08:27 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Andrea Gozzi:
> > Hi all.
> > Some time ago I set up a spammers' trap in the way of a fake webmail
> > service where they can register for a "free account".
> > Up until now I was just saving their
>
> The answer depends on how your webmail injects mail into Postfix.
>
> Wietse
Via smtpd.
Andrea
ps: just as a curiosity, would it even be possible to restrict based on
IP if injected via sendmail?
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 22:06 +0200, mouss wrote:
> Andrea Gozzi wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 13:03 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >>>
> >>> It works, thanks.
> >>> I have one further question: how do I restrict access to postfix for any
> >>&
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 13:25 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Andrea Gozzi:
> > On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 13:03 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It works, thanks.
> > > > I have one further question: how do I restrict access to
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 09:00 +0200, Andrea Gozzi wrote:
>
> The REDIRECT check can easily be bypassed by changing the MAIL FROM: ,
> so I configured the webmail to allow mail originating from the real
> address only.
> Unfortunately, someone might still try to connect directly t
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 08:20 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Andrea Gozzi:
> > On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 13:25 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > Andrea Gozzi:
> > > > On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 13:03 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > &g
-enabled host so i need to respect the 3.1.1
requirement on said RFC. For all other requirement i have a solution and
currently my system works as expected only if the handled message has only one
recipient.
Andrea
On Thursday 03 March 2016 13:09:42 Andrea Borghi wrote:
excue me, i forgot.
Using Postfix 2.11.3-1 as distributed with debian jessie (stable)
Andrea
s in order to use the correct
identitication to the next-hop host.
perhaps i can use the output of the sender_dependent_relayhost selection as a
key to select a trasport and then specify the grouping as you suggest as
wilcard in *that* transport ?
Andrea
y:mysql:/etc/postfix/virtual/domains.cf
virtual_mailbox_maps = proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/virtual/forwarding.cf,
proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/virtual/mailbox.cf
virtual_transport = dovecot
virtual_uid_maps = static:5000
Thank you
--
Andrea Cappelli
2016-08-20 23:40 GMT+02:00 Andrea Cappelli :
> Hi All,
> I have a postfix 2.9.6 setup on Ubuntu 12.04 which serve a bounch of local
> mailbox and act as mail gateway with a tcp transport
>
> I want to use some external authenticated MTA based on sendere domain, so
>
Ok,
com get relayed
correctly, other mail go to default smtp
Is my goal achievable and I'm worng at the configuration?
It's a bad idea?
Thanks
Andrea
PLACE Message-Id:
<$1...@domain.tld>
endif
It doesn't work. Could you tell me some suggestions?
Thanks.
Regards.
--
Andrea Di Mario
SPEAKAGE
=127.0.0.[10;11]*2,
bl.spamcop.net, bl.mailspike.net=127.0.0.[2;10;11;12]*2,
b.barracudacentral.org, ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
postscreen_dnsbl_threshold = 2
Andrea
Il 04/05/2012 17:29, Rod K ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> Was wondering if anyone would be willing to share what DNSBL and
> weights th
wl.mailspike.net=127.0.0.[19;20]*-2
Thanks,
Andrea
Il 11/05/2012 14:35, /dev/rob0 ha scritto:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:38:07PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>> On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 11:29:01 -0400, Rod K wrote:
>>
>>> Was wondering if anyone would be willing to share what DNSBL
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Uwe Dippel
> Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 10:20
> To: Wietse Venema
> Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: postfix unavailable at 5 minutes after the hour?
>
> On 0
Hi all! I'm trying to implement sid-milter with Postfix 2.7, but am having some
problems while trying to compile release 1.0 under RHEL 5.5 (x86_64) as shown
below, any ideas? otherwise, does anyone know where can I find an rpm package
for my distro?
Thanks in advance.
make[1]: Entering directo
hi all! I've a postfix server with a network table of around 100 IP addresses
(net/host), is there a way to explicitly permit the relaying to the Internet
from some of these IPs and others not?
thanks in advance.
"Cuidar la naturaleza es vivir mejor... hag?
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Mennens
> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 15:32
> To: Postfix
> Subject: Mail Statistics (OFF TOPIC)
>
> Guys I apologize if this doesn't belong here but I did a 'G
65 matches
Mail list logo
