Hi list,
I saw this in my logs:
Apr 29 14:58:08 mx postfix/smtpd[4880]: connect from
xxx.yyy.zzz[xxx.yyy.zzz.xxx]
Apr 29 14:58:09 mx postfix/smtpd[4880]: warning: valid_hostname: empty
hostname
Apr 29 14:58:09 mx postfix/smtpd[4880]: warning: malformed domain name
in resource data of MX record fo
Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I saw this in my logs:
>>
>> Apr 29 14:58:08 mx postfix/smtpd[4880]: connect from
>> xxx.yyy.zzz[xxx.yyy.zzz.xxx]
>> Apr 29 14:58:09 mx postfix/smtpd[4880]: warning: valid_hostname: empty
>> hostname
>> Apr 29 14:58:09 mx postfix/smtpd[4880]: warning: malforme
Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 09:39:10AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>>> This looks like a Null MX record:
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-delany-nullmx-00
>>>
>>> If the domain owner declares that this domain never sends or recieves
>>> email, then shouldn't postfix reje
Hi list,
Reading the archives I saw that there is a nice regexp with dynamic
hostnames available here: www.hardwarefreak.com/fqrdns.regexp
Unfortunately this file seems to be unavailable at the moment for some
reason.
Do you guys happen to know from where this file (latest) version can be
downloa
Steve Jenkins wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Бак Микаел wrote:
>> Hi list,
>> Reading the archives I saw that there is a nice regexp with dynamic
>> hostnames available here: www.hardwarefreak.com/fqrdns.regexp
>>
>> Unfortunately this file seems to be u
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> On 6/8/2011 8:35 AM, Бак Микаел wrote:
>> Steve Jenkins wrote:
>>> It's http://www.hardwarefreak.com/fqrdns.pcre
>> Oh, thanks. The maintainer must have renamed it.
>>
>> I don't know if the author reads this, but
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 6/8/2011 7:35 AM, Бак Микаел wrote:
>> Oh, thanks. The maintainer must have renamed it.
>
> Yes, I renamed it quite a long time ago (in internet time) when it was
> suggested running it through the pcre engine was more optimal. If
> memory serves
Jerry wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 13:47:02 +0200
> Matthias Andree articulated:
>
>> Am 08.07.2011 13:30, schrieb Zólyomi Szabolcs:
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I am a newbie here and in postfix too. After searching the web and
>>> browsing some forums, I still haven't got a solution for a problem
Damien Robinet wrote:
> Hi Harald,
>
> We have many agencies that can use our mail server.
> Each agency has one or more domain name. They can add their domain in
> our system to receive their emails professionals.
>
> We have already limited the users who have the right to the domain
> name in t
Mark Goodge wrote:
> On 11/07/2011 15:02, Бак Микаел wrote:
>>
>> Easy!
>> Fix the software that your trusted users use to add their domain. Make
>> THAT software check that the domain's MX record points to the right
>> place BEFORE you actually add it to
Peter Tselios wrote:
> Hallo,
> I need to prepare a presentation for my company because we plan to
> deploy a new mail system. I need to know the names of some medium to
> large ISPs that uses Postfix as their SMTP server. Do you know where I
> can find that information?
>
T-Online in Hungary
Peter Tselios wrote:
> Do you work for them? Because, the server does not report it's name :(
>
>
> T-Online in Hungary uses Postfix.
>
> $ host t-online.hu
> t-online.hu has address 84.2.36.211
> t-online.hu mail is handled
l...@airstreamcomm.net wrote:
>
> To summarize, we think SMTP Auth is the simplest and most useful way to
> allow people to send mail through our outbound mail system, and we are
> hoping to get some feedback from the community regarding this perspective.
>
Hi,
I think it's a good idea. Addition
Bernhard Rohrer wrote:
>
> seconded, only that submission is 587 ;)
>
Yes, of course! Stupid me :-)
14 matches
Mail list logo
