On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 08:26:37AM -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> > We're in the process of trolling all our logs to figure out what we can
> > ignore/filter/take action on, and we have a couple entries that I'm
> > wondering what's happening under the hood:
> >
> > 2025-05-18T
Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users:
> Hey folks,
>
> We're in the process of trolling all our logs to figure out what we can
> ignore/filter/take action on, and we have a couple entries that I'm wondering
> what's happening under the hood:
>
> 2025-05-18T15:42:07+00:00 post.dayjob.org postfix/smtpd
> On May 20, 2025, at 07:43, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 08:26:37AM -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
>>> We're in the process of trolling all our logs to figure out what we can
>>> ignore/filter/take action on, and we have a couple
Hey folks,
We're in the process of trolling all our logs to figure out what we can
ignore/filter/take action on, and we have a couple entries that I'm wondering
what's happening under the hood:
2025-05-18T15:42:07+00:00 post.dayjob.org postfix/smtpd [mail.warning] warning:
TLS library problem:
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 10:21:58AM -0700, Dan Mahoney wrote:
> > The remote SMTP client reported not liking the server certificate (sent
> > an alert to that effect):
>
> That was the bit that confused me — if we’re seeing an alert that says
> bad certificate, is it because we’re misconfigured on
