Hi
I have some problem with comunications postfix + python
in main.cf:
...
smtpd_restriction_classes=testowy
testowy=check_policy_service { unix:private/testowy, timeout=4s,
default_action=DUNNO }
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
check_recipient_access inline:{{testdomain.ltd=testowy}},
Hi
I wanted to enable SSL/TLS implicit encryption on port 465, in order
to do that, I added option smtpd_tls_wrappermode = yes in main.cf
config file, it worked.
After that option was enabled, ip relay trough port 25 with no
authentication or encryption stopped working, TLS became obligatory
for p
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 03:02:36PM +0100, Ivica Glavočić via Postfix-users
wrote:
> I wanted to enable SSL/TLS implicit encryption on port 465, in order
> to do that, I added option smtpd_tls_wrappermode = yes in main.cf
> config file, it worked.
No, it did not "work", because in main.cf it affe
Thanks for your help, everything works now.
With regards
Ivica Glavocic
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 3:12 PM Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 03:02:36PM +0100, Ivica Glavočić via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> > I wanted to enable SSL/TLS implicit encryption on port
Hi
Problem solved:
.
recipient = inputs.get("recipient", "")
if recipient.endswith("@testdomain.ltd"):
sys.stdout.write("action=REJECT\nreject_reason=554 5.7.1
Access denied\n\n")
else:
sys.stdout.write("action=DUNNO\n\n")
sys.stdout.
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 01:57:57PM +0100, natan via Postfix-users wrote:
> print("DUNNO") # REJECT, PERMIT, DUNNO
You did not read the docs carefully, the output should be:
action=DUNNO\n\n
> Nov 28 13:54:15 mx postfix/smtpd[2953675]: warning: missing attribute action
> in input fr
natan via Postfix-users:
> Hi
> I have some problem with comunications postfix + python
>
> in main.cf:
> ...
> smtpd_restriction_classes=testowy
> testowy=check_policy_service { unix:private/testowy, timeout=4s,
> default_action=DUNNO }
>
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> check_recipi
Hi
I'm trying to write something like DMARC in Python to reject if the from
and return-path for the selected domain are different
Because these similar solutions like vrfydmn (in Perl) are not very
user-friendly
W dniu 28.11.2024 o 13:57, natan via Postfix-users pisze:
Hi
I have some proble
