[pfx] Re: milter_header_checks clue gap

2024-11-23 Thread Randy Bush via Postfix-users
>> part of my problem is i miss playing `sendmail -bt` adventure to see >> what the mta is gonna do and why. e.g. from an exim system > > You can use "sendmail -bv", which isn't quite the same of course, ... very different. aside from actually sending the message, one has to dissect the log to

[pfx] Re: milter_header_checks clue gap

2024-11-23 Thread Randy Bush via Postfix-users
>>> I don't think that using local(8) as a content filter is a good idea, >>> perhaps you meant to instead use "REDIRECT" or "HOLD". >> >> /^X-Spam.*YES/ REDIRECT s...@m0.rg.net >> >> did the trick, along with a specific transport >> >> s...@m0.rg.net local:/var/mail/spam > >

[pfx] Re: milter_header_checks clue gap

2024-11-23 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Sat, Nov 23, 2024 at 11:11:11AM -0800, Randy Bush via Postfix-users wrote: > >> did the trick, along with a specific transport > >> > >> s...@m0.rg.net local:/var/mail/spam > > > > You've still not quite internalised my explanation of local(8) nexthops. > > There's no good reason