[pfx] Re: Opening up port 465

2024-11-08 Thread Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users
On 06-11-2024 21:54, Peter via Postfix-users wrote: On 7/11/24 09:48, Hua Young via Postfix-users wrote: Nope. smtps (port 465) and submissions (port 587) are two separated services defined in master.cf. Their use will not affect each other. "smtps" is the old name for "submissions" and both r

[pfx] milter_header_checks seems not to get all spam

2024-11-08 Thread Randy Bush via Postfix-users
fairly new at trying a scaled postfix install, so i assume it is my lack of clue. trying to use milter_header_checks to reject all marked spam on debian 12 running `mail_version = 3.7.11` milter_header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/milter_header_checks with # cat /etc/postfix/milter_head

[pfx] Re: Opening up port 465

2024-11-08 Thread Gerald Galster via Postfix-users
> 2024-11-08T16:14:09.034570+01:00 mail postfix/submissions/smtpd[107564]: > connect from unknown[192.168.1.1] > 2024-11-08T16:14:09.040936+01:00 mail postfix/submissions/smtpd[107564]: > SSL_accept error from unknown[192.168.1.1]: -1 > 2024-11-08T16:14:09.042051+01:00 mail postfix/submissions/sm

[pfx] Re: milter_header_checks seems not to get all spam

2024-11-08 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Randy Bush via Postfix-users: > >> fairly new at trying a scaled postfix install, so i assume it is my lack > >> of clue. trying to use milter_header_checks to reject all marked spam > >> on debian 12 running `mail_version = 3.7.11` > >> > >> milter_header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/milter_

[pfx] Re: milter_header_checks seems not to get all spam

2024-11-08 Thread Randy Bush via Postfix-users
>> removed the `i` and they are still getting through. > > milter_header_checks cannot see all headers, not even all headers > added by a milter. They only see headers that are added by a milter > that is connected to the cleanup process that implements > milter_header_checks. > > If you add the

[pfx] Re: milter_header_checks seems not to get all spam

2024-11-08 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Randy Bush via Postfix-users: > fairly new at trying a scaled postfix install, so i assume it is my lack > of clue. trying to use milter_header_checks to reject all marked spam > on debian 12 running `mail_version = 3.7.11` > > milter_header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/milter_header_checks >

[pfx] Re: milter_header_checks seems not to get all spam

2024-11-08 Thread Randy Bush via Postfix-users
>> fairly new at trying a scaled postfix install, so i assume it is my lack >> of clue. trying to use milter_header_checks to reject all marked spam >> on debian 12 running `mail_version = 3.7.11` >> >> milter_header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/milter_header_checks >> >> with >> >> # ca

[pfx] Re: milter_header_checks seems not to get all spam

2024-11-08 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 08:44:16AM -0800, Randy Bush via Postfix-users wrote: > Fairly new at trying a scaled postfix install, so I assume it is my > lack of clue. Trying to use milter_header_checks to reject all marked > spam on debian 12 running `mail_version = 3.7.11` > > milter_header_ch

[pfx] Re: ssl/tls error in mail.log

2024-11-08 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 10:40:30AM +1000, raf via Postfix-users wrote: > > Sep 24 21:49:18 mxback postfix/smtps/smtpd[24711]: warning: TLS library > > problem: error:0A6C:SSL routines::bad key > > share:../ssl/statem/extensions_srvr.c:646: > > But I'm not sure what "bad key" means specifical

[pfx] Re: milter_header_checks seems not to get all spam

2024-11-08 Thread Randy Bush via Postfix-users
>> Fairly new at trying a scaled postfix install, so I assume it is my >> lack of clue. Trying to use milter_header_checks to reject all marked >> spam on debian 12 running `mail_version = 3.7.11` >> >> milter_header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/milter_header_checks > > Was it definitely the

[pfx] Re: milter_header_checks seems not to get all spam

2024-11-08 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 10:25:27PM -0800, Randy Bush via Postfix-users wrote: > >> Fairly new at trying a scaled postfix install, so I assume it is my > >> lack of clue. Trying to use milter_header_checks to reject all marked > >> spam on debian 12 running `mail_version = 3.7.11` > >> > >> mi

[pfx] Re: milter_header_checks seems not to get all spam

2024-11-08 Thread Randy Bush via Postfix-users
>> /^X-Spam.*YES/i REJECT > Please review https://www.postfix.org/regexp_table.5.html#table_format > and do pay attention to the 'i' option. doh. thank you! randy ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an em

[pfx] Re: Opening up port 465

2024-11-08 Thread Florian Piekert via Postfix-users
Hello, Nope. smtps (port 465) and submissions (port 587) are two separated services defined in master.cf. Their use will not affect each other. "smtps" is the old name for "submissions" and both refer to 465. "submission" (without the "s" on the end) is port 587. Find the "smtps" or "submis

[pfx] Re: Opening up port 465

2024-11-08 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 04:17:32PM +0100, Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users wrote: > 2024-11-08T16:14:09.034570+01:00 mail postfix/submissions/smtpd[107564]: > connect from unknown[192.168.1.1] You're perhaps doing source NAT on external client IPs, which would make your logs less useful. > 20