[pfx] Re: {Disarmed} Error when I try send a e-mail using my postfix server using the "New Outlook"

2024-10-31 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users: > giuliano--- via Postfix-users: > > Hi everyone, > > I hope this message finds you well. > > > > I'm having problems with the "new outlook" the default version in > > Windows 11. > > > > When I connect to my account in the "new outlook", the IMAP connection > >

[pfx] Re: {Disarmed} Error when I try send a e-mail using my postfix server using the "New Outlook"

2024-10-31 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
giuliano--- via Postfix-users: > Hi everyone, > I hope this message finds you well. > > I'm having problems with the "new outlook" the default version in > Windows 11. > > When I connect to my account in the "new outlook", the IMAP connection > works fine, I can see all the e-mails, but when I

[pfx] {Disarmed} Error when I try send a e-mail using my postfix server using the "New Outlook"

2024-10-31 Thread giuliano--- via Postfix-users
Hi everyone, I hope this message finds you well. I'm having problems with the "new outlook" the default version in Windows 11. When I connect to my account in the "new outlook", the IMAP connection works fine, I can see all the e-mails, but when I try to send a new e-mail a receive a e-mail

[pfx] Re: OT: k8s network presentation

2024-10-31 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Nico Schottelius via Postfix-users: Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE -- Start of PGP signed section. > > Hello postfix users, > > I know I am probably not the most conventional guy moving postfix into > IPv6 only kubernetes stacks, but there are good reasons for it. > > To explain a

[pfx] Re: Suggestion: Add lifecycle events / pipe each logfile entry to external command

2024-10-31 Thread postfix--- via Postfix-users
I need to find out if an outgoing message was successfully delivered or not. I know this can be achieved by setting up some filesystem watcher for the logfile, and/or by having a cronjob searching through the logfile for the line containing `status=`. But it would be so much nicer if Postfix wou

[pfx] Re: `postfix-pgsql`: Issues with expansion parameters `%s`, `%u` and `%d`, and some minor bugs(?)

2024-10-31 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users: > > But my point is: If somebody is configuring the database lookup at > > `local_recipient_maps`, they will not read those docs about virtual > > If the local_recipient_maps description is incomplete then that can > be fixed, just like the pgsql_table(5) text.

[pfx] Re: `postfix-pgsql`: Issues with expansion parameters `%s`, `%u` and `%d`, and some minor bugs(?)

2024-10-31 Thread Thomas Landauer via Postfix-users
Hi, yeah, I think the docs about the connection are clearer now :-) However, the "three queries behavior" is still undocumented IMO. I did read https://www.postfix.org/virtual.5.html and it is nicely explained there. But my point is: If somebody is configuring the database lookup at `local_re

[pfx] Suggestion: Add lifecycle events / pipe each logfile entry to external command

2024-10-31 Thread Thomas Landauer via Postfix-users
Hi, my use case: I need to find out if an outgoing message was successfully delivered or not. I know this can be achieved by setting up some filesystem watcher for the logfile, and/or by having a cronjob searching through the logfile for the line containing `status=`. But it would be so much ni

[pfx] Re: `postfix-pgsql`: Issues with expansion parameters `%s`, `%u` and `%d`, and some minor bugs(?)

2024-10-31 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Thomas Landauer via Postfix-users: > Hi, > > yeah, I think the docs about the connection are clearer now :-) > > However, the "three queries behavior" is still undocumented IMO. I did The three queries are documented in the virtual(5) text. Postfix has a layered architecture for table lookups.

[pfx] Re: Suggestion: Add lifecycle events / pipe each logfile entry to external command

2024-10-31 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Thomas Landauer via Postfix-users: > Hi, > > my use case: > I need to find out if an outgoing message was successfully delivered or not. > I know this can be achieved by setting up some filesystem watcher for > the logfile, and/or by having a cronjob searching through the logfile > for the line

[pfx] Re: rejection policy

2024-10-31 Thread postfix--- via Postfix-users
I have policyd-spf and opendkim (as a milter) installed for postfix. How can I customize the policy that, if an incoming message has SPF failed AND has invalid DKIM then this message will be rejected? AFAIK google has this kind of rejection policy for their gmail. That is what DMARC does. Ther

[pfx] rejection policy

2024-10-31 Thread Adriel via Postfix-users
Hello, I have policyd-spf and opendkim (as a milter) installed for postfix. How can I customize the policy that, if an incoming message has SPF failed AND has invalid DKIM then this message will be rejected? AFAIK google has this kind of rejection policy for their gmail. I know that in opend

[pfx] Re: `postfix-pgsql`: Issues with expansion parameters `%s`, `%u` and `%d`, and some minor bugs(?)

2024-10-31 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 12:52:51PM +0100, Thomas Landauer via Postfix-users wrote: > Hi, > > yeah, I think the docs about the connection are clearer now :-) > > However, the "three queries behavior" is still undocumented IMO. I did read > https://www.postfix.org/virtual.5.html and it is nicely e