[pfx] Re: issues with hash lookup during a postmap

2024-10-04 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Aleksandr Stankevi? via Postfix-users: > Hi postfix-users! > > > We've recently encountered an issue where postfix lookup does not find an > entry in the hash table while postmap is running. Here?s some logs for a > few emails for u...@example.com before/during/after postmap: For safe Berkeley D

[pfx] Re: chroot (as in Debian) or not? / documentation

2024-10-04 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Vincent Lefevre via Postfix-users: > > That eliminates most of the threats that Postfix chroot aims to > > address, and there is no need to run Postfix daemons chrooted. > > OK. I suppose that this should be the most common situation for the > average user. So this is what Debian should do, accord

[pfx] issues with hash lookup during a postmap

2024-10-04 Thread Aleksandr Stankevič via Postfix-users
Hi postfix-users! We’ve recently encountered an issue where postfix lookup does not find an entry in the hash table while postmap is running. Here’s some logs for a few emails for u...@example.com before/during/after postmap: Oct 3 18:08:07 mx2 postfix/smtpd[3195]: CFEDF299414: client= smtp1-1

[pfx] Re: chroot (as in Debian) or not? / documentation

2024-10-04 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in <4xkqfs5trnzj...@spike.porcupine.org>: |Vincent Lefevre via Postfix-users: |>> That eliminates most of the threats that Postfix chroot aims to |>> address, and there is no need to run Postfix daemons chrooted. |> |> OK. I suppose that this should be t

[pfx] Re: chroot (as in Debian) or not? / documentation

2024-10-04 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users: > Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in > <4xkqfs5trnzj...@spike.porcupine.org>: > |Vincent Lefevre via Postfix-users: > |>> That eliminates most of the threats that Postfix chroot aims to > |>> address, and there is no need to run Postfix daemons chrooted

[pfx] Re: chroot (as in Debian) or not? / documentation

2024-10-04 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 09:23:12PM +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users wrote: > |For good reasons, Postfix 3.x does not enable chroot by default > |since 10+ years. If a distro maintainer keeps it on, then they own > |the responsibility to inform users of how to solve chroot related >

[pfx] Re: chroot (as in Debian) or not? / documentation

2024-10-04 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote in : |On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 09:23:12PM +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-u\ |sers wrote: | |>|For good reasons, Postfix 3.x does not enable chroot by default |>|since 10+ years. If a distro maintainer keeps it on, then they own |>|the responsibili

[pfx] Re: chroot (as in Debian) or not? / documentation

2024-10-04 Thread Vincent Lefevre via Postfix-users
On 2024-10-04 08:05:14 -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: > Vincent Lefevre via Postfix-users: > > Debian runs most postfix services in a chroot, with the consequence > > that the resolv.conf file may become obsolete. This is a particular > > annoyance on a laptop, where this file typica

[pfx] Re: chroot (as in Debian) or not? / documentation

2024-10-04 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Vincent Lefevre via Postfix-users: > Debian runs most postfix services in a chroot, with the consequence > that the resolv.conf file may become obsolete. This is a particular > annoyance on a laptop, where this file typically changes often as > the laptop moves from one place to another. At > htt

[pfx] chroot (as in Debian) or not? / documentation

2024-10-04 Thread Vincent Lefevre via Postfix-users
Debian runs most postfix services in a chroot, with the consequence that the resolv.conf file may become obsolete. This is a particular annoyance on a laptop, where this file typically changes often as the laptop moves from one place to another. At https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b